A disturbing book crazeGreat children's writers don't appeal to the lowest, most suspicious impulses in their readers. Lemony Snicket's creator does. It is always a joy to see children completely absorbed in a book, but joy can give way to consternation when closer inspection reveals exactly what they are reading. That is the case, I’m afraid, with the highly popular Lemony Snicket series, which traces the fortunes of three orphaned children: Violet, Klaus, and Sunny Beaudelaire. Without exception, the parents and teachers in my life who are avid readers have expressed grave concerns about these books. The early volumes in this series of fourteen have titles signalling its overall tone and thematic focus: The Bad Beginning, The Reptile Room, The Miserable Mill, The Austere Academy, The Vile Village. Their covers resemble the ghoulish creations of the celebrated New Yorker cartoonist Charles Addams. Collectively titled A Series of Unfortunate Events, the Snicket series arrived on the publishing scene in the midst of global excitement about the imminent release of another Harry Potter novel. Soon afterwards its youngish American author, Daniel Handler (Lemony Snicket is a pseudonym), appeared on Australian television -- presumably, to promote sales. His performance did not ease anybody's serious worries. Now that the series is complete, with sales remaining high, concerns about its nastiness continue to surface with disturbing regularity. These concerns differ markedly from those expressed about J. K. Rowling's brilliant series: most obviously because it is experienced readers of world literature who voice them, and magic is not an issue. What teenagers and adults who have been nurtured by fine children's literature all their lives say is that Lemony Snicket makes a sick joke out of the plight of three seriously at-risk children. In each fairy tale, the thin plot revolves around the helplessness of the Beaudelaire orphans in the face of unrelenting adult brutality. Murder, threats of terrifying violence, cold indifference to the feelings of others, endemic media slander, wildly false and rash accusations, child labour practices that make Blake's late-18th century chimney sweepers look fortunate, medical ineptitude, bureaucratic circumlocution, an Orwellian intercom system, and a host of other horrors propel the narrative. The crassness of a morbidly satirical prose is missed by most youngsters because its clever, designedly "entertaining", purportedly sympathetic-to-Cinderella veneer bamboozles them. Indeed, some avid older readers speak about the attractiveness of the style. Even youngsters who should know better are impervious to the cumulative effect of page after page of dialogue like this, taken from Book Number 8, The Hostile Hospital:
(Klaus, on the chief guardian of Mulctuary Money Management): "Mr Poe has never done anything except send us to one disastrous home after another." All of the voices I have heard in these books, most of the time, sound remarkably similar. This is never the case in superior literature. In the finest satire, as in "straight" realism or fantasy, the authorial voice can be clearly distinguished from the voices of unattractive characters; and each heroic character (if there is more than one, as there often is) sounds appreciably different. Since many well-intentioned adults without sound literary training and experience do not know this fact about dialogue and narration, child readers cannot be expected to. From the word go in the text itself, Lemony Snicket cynically and cleverly warns his audience not to continue reading. His clear expectation is that because children are being told how bad the books are going to be for them, they will rebel against his injunction, laugh wickedly to themselves, and demand more, parodying Oliver Twist. Knowing that children will be interested in the plight of three orphans facing gross injustice and cruelty, he counts on the fact that they will fail to perceive that the case being put against adulthood and the world is skewed. Although defenders of Lemony Snicket are likely to insist that this young man hates cruelty to children and wants to expose it in its most unpleasant forms, what has to be said against this claim is that great children's writers -- for instance, E.B. White, the author of Charlotte's Web -- never load the dice as Snicket does. They depict much more than Flowers of Evil (the title of the real poet Beaudelaire's most famous work). They don't appeal primarily to the lowest, most suspicious, impulses in their reading audience. Their exposure of serious danger is balanced by their depiction of goodness and beauty. Indeed: the finest artists for children (and adults) do not relish scenarios that are depressingly bleak and nasty. They have too much authentic modesty to refer in earnest to a major satirist like William Congreve as a writing "colleague". Through dialogue that immortalises inimitable voices, they dramatise the fact that the human scene is agreeably diverse. Without sentimentality (which falsifies reality), they show that decency can be counted on -- even if, as in tragedy, wickedness wreaks havoc in the lives of the innocent. On the back cover of the first book in the series Lemony Snicket advises readers like me to stop reading. I'm afraid that soon after starting Volume 2 the first time round, out of a sense of literary/critical responsibility, I took his advice. This time I got half-way through Volume 8 and skimmed other bits in it and in Volume 6. Although I intended to have a look at the very last volume, which I was told on good authority is for adults and not for children, I cannot bring myself to wait for it to be returned to my local library. Enough is enough. Dr Susan Moore is a retired teacher educator who has published widely on literature, education, religion, and culture. She taught at the Sydney Institute of Education for 14 years and worked for the Institute of Public Affairs as a research fellow and as editor of Education Monitor. Raised in New Jersey, she has lived in Australia for 40 years. |
morebythisauthorfree updates |
Comments (1)
cherry said...I have read all of the Snicket and Potter series. I thoroughly enjoyed the first and became more and more concerned with the second. I might ad that my children devoured and relished the Baudelaire's stories. I have withheld Rowling's later installments because they have become increasingly unsuitable. What can the children find in the series of Unfortunate Events? A lot of sharp and intelligent wit, constant vocabulary extension, an introduction to the reality and the banality of evil, discussion of natural law concepts and morality (eg ends never justify evil means, that actions shape our characters, that evil must be resisted etc). There is much heroism from the orphans and their friends both children and adults. There are also many foolish adults who, because of what could only be described as modern secularist world views, allow wicked people to do evil. There is quite a dramatic attack on pacifism . There are attacks on postivist conceptions of the law and on the failure of courage to enforce law. There is critiques of peer group pressure and economic greed and vanity.
As a series it is clever, funny on every page, tragic, sad and also inspiring. The orphans make mistakes but they re-evaluate, make new resolutions and try harder. It is a story about virtue, vice and the moral life. I don't believe that this ultimately could be said about Rowling's series. I would refer readers to Michael OBrien's critique of Harry Potter and indicate that I would largely agree with his analysis. I might also add that I too have read many times, the Tolkein books and the Narnia books. Moore would be alone in not hearing Snicket, the narrator's witty and compassionate voice in the story. Continual clues about his mysterious involvement add extra enjoyment for readers.
-- | Tuesday, 4 December 2007 at 11:16 pm
Page 1 of 1 :
New comment