Patrick Meagher | Sunday, 15 July 2007

Don’t know who he is but he sure sells a lot of t-shirts

What the face of Che Guevara really means.

During t-shirt weather it’s hard to miss the haunting photogenic face of Che Guevara: The communist star on the beret, the unkempt long hair and scraggly beard. You can also find him on coffee mugs, pendants and underwear. That one black-on-white image, the beautiful bad boy look, is the most famous in the world, according to the Maryland Institute of the College of Art, in the US.

Britain’s Prince Harry wore that famous face at a party two years ago. Musician Carlos Santana proudly displayed Che at the 2005 Academy Awards. Actor Johnny Depp has the image on a necklace and Angelina Jolie has a Che tattoo but won’t say where. The ubiquitous image helped Che earn a spot on Time magazine’s list of the top 100 most important people of the 20th century.

That one black-on-white image, the beautiful bad boy look, is the most famous in the world.

When you actually ask people wearing Che about who he is, they offer platitudes. They might mention freedom fighting but they rarely give you details or back up their claims. Typically, they don’t really know who he is, which makes their hold on this "hero" suspiciously reeking of adolescent rebellion.

"He’s a Mexican freedom fighter," said one young man at our local market in Canada’s capital city of Ottawa.

"Is it Bob Marley?" asked a 20-year-old, looking at a photo of the famous face. "Does it have something to do with drugs? I’ve seen his picture in rooms of students I know who are into drugs."

Ask those who sell the shirts and they know little more. Said a young man with a nose ring selling Che t-shirts and flags at an outside kiosk: “He’s a guerrilla fighter. He’s from Columbia or Venezuela.”

“Why’s he famous?” I asked.

“He fought for his people."

“What did he do?"

“He’s a freedom fighter.”

That famous “freedom fighter” face became an icon of the anti-establishment and anti-Americanism in the late 1960s and has spawned a multi-million dollar memorabilia industry and you are going to see more of it. 2007 is the 40th anniversary of the death of Che, captured and shot in Bolivia with the help of the CIA. And there you have it. CIA: bad. Che: good. No brainer. Using the same logic, we might one day see college kids wearing t-shirts with Saddam Hussein or Osama Bin Laden.

The underdog hero image is helped by books like Che: A Revolutionary Life, an 800-page tribute written by New Yorker writer Jon Anderson in 1998. Anderson argues he has not unearthed one legitimate claim that Che executed an innocent man. Director Steven Soderbergh is now shooting what will become two movies about Che, both based on Anderson’s book, with Benicio Del Toro playing the hero. A few more pro-Che books are being published this year.

Meantime, the anti-Che memorabilia industry is catching up. You can also buy the famous face on a t-shirt blazened with the words "Murdering communist bastard." There’s the more tame: "Che Guevara: Fooling middle class white kids since 1967." My favourite t-shirt reads: "Don’t know who this guy is but he sure sells a lot of t-shirts."

The Canadian conservative magazine, the Western Standard, now sells t-shirts of columnist Mark Steyn, his face poised in a way that mimics the famous Che photo.

In time for the October anniversary, Cuban-born Humberto Fontova has also written about Che but it’s hardly gushing. Entitled Exposing the real Che Guevara , Fontova was seven years old when his family fled Cuba with little more than the clothes on their backs. Castro’s soldiers yanked off his mothers’ earrings at the airport saying they now belonged to the revolution. The author’s cousin was not so lucky. He taught catechism lessons at a local church where he also spoke against the revolution. He disappeared one day. His dead body showed up at a police station.

Fontova is also highly critical of author Anderson, noting that hundreds of eyewitnesses to Che’s executions are only one taxi ride away from Anderson in New York City. If Fontova’s book were the evidence for a trial, it would be more than enough to find Che guilty of murder. Fontova openly relishes grinding his axe for Che, as he piles eyewitness account upon eyewitness account.  At least, he acknowledges his own aggression. "If Cuban Americans strike you as too passionate, over the top, even a little crazy, there is a reason," he writes. "Practically, every day, we turn on our televisions or go out to the street only to see the image of the very man who trained the secret police to murder our relatives -– thousands of men, women and boys."

For people sick of the whitewashed accounts of Che, as in Robert Redford’s 2004 movie Motorcycle Diaries, reading Fontova’s book is a victorious breath of fresh air when it’s not reading like a heart-wrenching victim impact statement. The real Ernesto "Che" Guevara, according to Fontova, started his adult life as a wandering Argentinean misfit from a wealthy family. "Che" was slang for "dude" and it was how he signed his name. He was not a doctor, as has been widely reported. He read widely and became a hard-core communist. He joined the Cuban revolution with Fidel Castro and, until one day in 1957 when Castro ordered his first execution, he was a nobody.

Che volunteered to accompany the executioner, who hesitated in completing Castro’s command. Che quickly stepped in and shot the victim in the temple. He later wrote to his father that "at that moment I discovered that I really like killing".

Castro took note. He needed an efficient executioner, a man who could kill without a troubled conscience, as there were many dissidents to dispose of. Che became head of the main prison, La Cabana, where anyone suspected of opposing Castro was incarcerated. In the first three months at La Cabana, Guevara signed 400 death warrants. Over the course of time and with his own hand he shot at least 180 people. Pierre San Martin was in La Cabana and recalled seeing a 14-year-old boy dragged in front of Che. His crime was defending his father, who had been arrested and shot. "We saw Che unholstering his pistol. He put the barrel to the back of the boy’s neck and blasted. The shot almost decapitated the young boy."

In 1961, there were 300,000 Cubans in prison out of a population of 6.4 million. That’s about one person in prison for every 21 people. At any one time in the notorious Soviet Gulag, there was one person in prison for every 110 people in the country. That same year, Castro’s regime, propped up by support from the Soviet Union, received nuclear missiles. To avoid war, the American and Soviet governments agreed to allow a Communist government in Cuba in exchange for the removal of the weapons. In 1962, thinking that he was speaking off-record, Che told the London Daily Worker: "If the nuclear missiles had remained we would have used them against the very heart of America, including New York City."

Yet Che Guevara was applauded at the United Nations General Assembly in 1964 when he announced that Cuba killed people. "Certainly we execute," he said. On that same trip he helped plan a bombing of the Statue of Liberty, the Liberty Bell and Washington Monument. But the bombs never went off. The New York Police Department discovered the plot.

There’s a legion of uncomplimentary documented facts about Che Guevara and they are not difficult to unearth. This makes it more apparent that the Che fanfare is a symptom of a big problem. It seems that juvenile rebellion and apathy is now common among grown men and women, well into their adult life. Characterized by dishonesty and laziness, people simply believe what they want to believe. Author Fontova includes this outrageous anecdote about guitarist Carlos Santana. He got up from his seat in a café to confront a young Cuban wearing a t-shirt stamped with the homemade lettering: "Che’s dead—get over it." The young Henry Gomez argued that Che had killed hundreds of people.

Gomez reported that Santana, incredibly, told him: "You’re getting hung up on facts, man. We’re only free when we free our hearts."

Ironically, those t-shirts celebrating Che tell us a more about the people wearing the shirts than they do about that Argentinean butcher. 

Patrick Meagher is MercatorNet's Contributing Editor for Canada.

Comments to Don’t know who he is but he sure sells a lot of t-shirts have been disabled. Thank you for your contribution.
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Guantamo said... Chile | Mon, 23 Jul 2007 at 4:42 pm

Many western people dont generally understand that in Latin America you are often times either hard left or right and politics is very devisive. So wearing a Che shirt might be a symbol of ignorance of his antics yes, but it can also mean in a place like Latin America a disdain for the corrupt governments where there has been little done alleviate the absolute poverty. Idealism and radical characters like Che are bound to rise up and become heroes in the same way Osama is idolised by certain sections of society for making a point about Western corruption and moral positions (or lack thereof) incongruent with Islamic ideals.

If you wear a Tshirt it can mean a multiplicity of things as any symbol can as time goes on. Anyway, the last thing Che would have wanted is his face being turned into a commercialised logo. He was a complex character, and in some cases so are the reasons for choosing to wear his face. In most cases though, one simply uses the same logic for wearing Che as they do for wearing Gucci. Westerners need something to alleviate their guilt complex for being affluent and yet haveing their conscience pricked due to the horrendous amount of world poverty.


Kathleen Chabotc said... -- | Sun, 22 Jul 2007 at 2:45 am

Thank you for this. Che Guevara has been a false hero for far too long.


Mark Mason said... Australia | Sat, 21 Jul 2007 at 7:27 pm

I watched the motorcycle diaries a while ago. I knew Ernesto turned into an extremist communist as the movie kind of depicts with flashes of text at the end, but after seeing motorcycle diaries i though he’d turned communist in the most fair generous communal sense...if there is one. oh well, i guess i was one of the clueless teens. So much for the t-shirts… as for the Robert Plant one in your image, I kind of like it. don’t wreck my Robert Plant dream, it’s more fragile than the one i had about Che Guevara. Although signing his name ‘Dude’ is pretty damn cool, disregarding everything he did after about 20years of age...I’m so disappointed. No wonder motorcycle diaries didn’t have a sequel, not a nice story to tell, almost as bad as pirates 3. haha


Christopher Canaris said... Australia | Sat, 21 Jul 2007 at 7:11 pm

Tragically, history is all too often rewritten. As a child in Ghana, I witnessed the overthrow of Kwame Nkrumah, the brilliantly charismatic but utterly psychopathic “Father” of Pan-African nationalism. He bankrupted Ghana (perhaps the wealthiest of all West African states at the time of its independence from Britain in 1957) and styled himself the “Osagyefo” meaning “Redeemer” of his nation. He and his coterie were immensely corrupt and he gaoled his opposition en masse.

In its search for a foundational myth, Ghana has rehabilitated Nkrumah and his body now lies in a specially built mausoleum while “Kwame Nkrumah Halls” and memorial abound throughout Africa.

The former Soviet Union still hankers after the good old days and many still remember Stalin with genuine affection.

Meanwhile, Napoleon Bonaparte lies entombed in glory in the Church of Les Invalides despite having wrought devastation throughout Europe on a scale excelled only by the mass slaughter of the twentieth century.

“Plus ca change, plus c’est la même chose.”


Dr Susan R Moore said... Australia | Sat, 21 Jul 2007 at 6:49 pm

Thank you, Patrick Meahger, and Dellusionist.  Very interesting. 
In my youth, when I worked with disadvantaged city kids as a counsellor at University Settlement Camp in NY (not far from West Point but much closer to Pete Seeger’s house), one of the more radical and grave counsellors, considerably older than I was, was Bolivian.  I wonder, if he’s alive, what he thinks about Che Guevara now.  Then, he was supporting freedom fighters.


Arthur said... Australia | Sat, 21 Jul 2007 at 4:20 pm

I wonder who is getting the royalties for all those t-shirts…


Patrick Meagher said... Canada | Thu, 19 Jul 2007 at 1:05 am

Re: Comments by Dellusionist
Yes, you are right about Motorcycle Diaries being premiered in 2004, not 2005. With the Internet one has the luxury of correcting errors. Note the correction has been made in the article. Thank you for that.

I would still suggest that Robert Redford would claim ownership to the film.

You make an interesting point about Che Guevara and medical studies. There is no record of him receiving a degree at any university in Argentina that would qualify him as a physician. He did work for some time as a medic for Fidel Castro, which would require some training, as you suggest, even if very limited. My intention was only to dispell the rumour of Guevara as physician, as it is widely held.


Dellusionist said... Australia | Wed, 18 Jul 2007 at 3:31 pm

I do not claim to be a Che Guevara expert (far from it!), but some quick Google-assisted research has revealed some questionable statements in Mr Meagher’s article:

“Robert Redford’s 2005 movie Motorcycle Diaries “
The Motorcycle Diaries was a film directed by Walter Salles, Robert Redford was merely an executive producer.
The film premiered in Jan 2004 at the Sundance Film Festival in the USA.  It was released in Canada (on limited release) in October 2004, after screenings at the Toronto and Vancouver film festivals.
So – not really “Robert Redford’s”, and certainly not “2005”.

“He was not a doctor, as has been widely reported.”
This is somewhat disingenuous statement.
After taking a year off from his studies to undertake the journey recounted in The Motorcycle Diaries, Guevara fast-tracked his medical studies at the University of Buenos Aires, so as to be able to travel again sooner.
Again, I do not claim to be an expert on medical training and accreditation, but it appears Guevara graduated with the degree of “Medic” from the University of Buenos Aires in 1953.  This was a lesser degree, the degree of “Doctor” would have required further clinical training.
It seems fairly certain Guevara completed some form of medical training, and practiced medicine in some capacity (or at the very least utilised this training) at some points throughout his life.  However, he seems not have been entitled to legally refer to himself as “Dr Guevara”.
To say “[h]e was not a doctor” seems to imply Guevara lacked medical expertise, which appears to be inaccurate.

This is not intended as a defence of Che Guevara (or those who wear his image).  I am merely concerned with factual accuracy, and would humbly suggest that accuracy is essential to this kind of article, or else there exists a chink for easy exploitation by those who would seek to critique more than mere nit-picking details.


Mariusz Wesolowski said... Canada | Wed, 18 Jul 2007 at 9:27 am

The popularity of Che t-shirts is one more example of the total confusion reigning in the contemporary world, just like the wearing of crucifix earrings and pendants by people who don’t have the slightest idea about the real meaning of Christianity. In the words of Albert Einstein, “There are two infinite things, the universe and human stupidity but I am not so sure about the universe...”


Peter Longfellow said... Canada | Tue, 17 Jul 2007 at 7:52 am

To the attention of Patrick Meagher:

Dear Pat,

I suggest that we soon put a t-shirt on the market showing Lord Conrad Black as a capitalist martyr. Saint Conrad, that poor man that was thrown to the lions in a Chicago courtroom, recently. The Thomas More of the IIIrd millenium. An innocent man and a martyr.

Yours truly,

Peter Longfellow,
Canada.


Page 2 of 2 :  <  1 2