Enchanted

Disney spoofs Disney in this delightful tale of fairy-tale romance in the mean streets of Manhattan. 

Did you ever wonder how a fairy tale princess spellbound by an envious wicked stepmother, would cope if she were alone on the unforgiving streets of New York City? It's a great premise for a holiday movie.

Enchanted begins like a typical 1950s Disney film with a beautiful princess falling head over heels for a handsome prince. Immediately she begins to make her wedding plans. It sounds like a perfect opportunity for mocking the winsome princess Giselle (Amy Adams) and showing her wide-eyed innocence to be utterly ridiculous in the real world. Fortunately Disney has more imagination than that.

Though cast into oblivion down a wishing well by a deliciously scheming wicked stepmother-in-law, played by Susan Sarandon, in the middle of her triumphant march to the altar with debonair Prince Edward (James Marsden), Giselle never loses hope in a happy ending. She emerges from a manhole in Manhattan and wanders the streets, jostled by the uncaring crowd, yet her cheeriness is undimmed. One feels for her vulnerability as her flouncy, low-cut wedding frock begins to wilt in the rain as she searches in vain for her castle in the sky. But this is a fairy tale and somehow she finds a safe haven in the apartment of reluctant hero Robert Phillips (Patrick Dempsey).

A cynical divorce lawyer and single father who deals in the marital misery of others like himself, Robert is determined to raise his six-year-old daughter Morgan "in the real world", suppressing her girlish inclinations to believe in fairy princesses. He has no intention of allowing her to build up romantic dreams which will surely be dashed to pieces upon the rocks of real life.

So you can imagine Robert’s alarm when little Morgan wakes him up to watch Princess Giselle making fairy-tale magic with the city critters who are doing his household chores! Morgan is thrilled with the idea of befriending a princess in distress. Robert is perplexed by a singing, sewing, certified fairytale princess. And his less-than-enchanted girlfriend Nancy (Idina Menzel) is livid when she enters the apartment and finds towel-clad Giselle cooing over her boyfriend. Menzel is perfect as the hardened New York City career woman who is longing for romance.

The appeal of Enchanted is the interaction of outstanding special effects, which make the impossible seem effortless with the alacrity of Spiderman, and Stephen Schwartz’s lyrical score, capped off with a spectacular Beauty and the Beast style dance scene in Central Park. Somehow disbelief is suspended and the story line works. The character stereotypes are good natured jabs at fairy tale conventions, without souring into the cynicism of the sequel to Shrek. A hilarious animated sidekick, Giselle’s faithful chipmunk friend Pip, follows her into exile and searches for her with Prince Edward. He provides comic relief, while the scheming courtier Nathaniel (Timothy Spall) pursues Giselle to thwart her happy reunion with Prince Edward, by order of stepmother Narissa.

Both Giselle's romantic impulses and Robert's cynicism are challenged by the outcome, with Morgan leading the way for both of them to learn the moral of the movie. And this is: "go with your instincts, but make certain you talk to one another first."

Don’t look for anything too substantial in Enchanted, but it has good performances and thrilling special effects. The film is not appropriate for younger children, however, due to some near violence, implied homosexuality, sexual innuendos (including a scantily-clad shower mishap). This playful romp in Central Park is appropriate for adolescents girls and their mothers. They can have some interesting post-movie chats about the place of romance in marriage, and the meaning of true love.

Comment (4) | Email | Print | del.icio.us | Technorati | digg

Comments (4)

Elizabeth Kathryn Gerold-Miller said...

It pleases me that Disney still finds the value of fairy tales in the entertainment of children, rather than mocking the moralism and traditional symbolism incorporated. As always, Leticia Velasquez has pointedly detailed some of the points parents should look for in preparation for their post-viewing discussion with their children.

United States | Sunday, 9 December 2007 at 2:54 am

Emcee said...

This movie will make people realize that there is always a hope and love. Love can is not just in fairytale but also in real worl. Love is the most powerful element that is existing here on earth. The song s are great and the kids will enjoy the time watching the film. It gives balance on reality and fairytale.

Philippines | Tuesday, 11 December 2007 at 6:35 pm

Mrs. Biss said...

The storyline was endearing. I did like how the movie began in typical Disney fairy-talish animation and then lead into non-animation upon Giselles arrival in the sewers of NYC. I didn't particularly care for the casting choice of Amy Adam as Giselle, but still I settled into the movie once the animation was over, to give the movie a chance.

Skipping ahead to Giselle's choice of Ball Gowns= yuk! No fairy-tale princess, in my opinion, would wear such a body revealing, immodest dress to a ball, of all places. However, I loved the looks of most of the other ballgowns, as they were actually ballgowns.

The acting by Demsey, Menzel and the little girl that played Morgan, was very good and believable. Sarandon did a fabulous job as this evil step-mother-witch-type of the prince, wishing to keep her clutches on her crown and title.

Most of the costuming was good. Music & Dancing were very enjoyable. Special effects were great.

Definitly okay for adults and teens, but depending on the child and her maturity or naivete, my suggestion would be that parent pre-screen movie first to see if any of the scenes violates your child's innocents and go from there.

I found the shower to towel scene to be okay as it was not portrayed in a sexual manner, nor did it show any nudity. But that is how one is dressed when coming out of the shower, this just had the help of a fairy-tail type of toweling, but I'm an adult. My question is: was the shower scene necessary for the storyline, I just don't think so, but others may disagree.

I would give the movie 3.5 stars out of 5. God bless!

United States | Saturday, 5 January 2008 at 1:54 am

Disney Movies said...

i wrote the same topic before in my blog too;

10x for it.

United States | Friday, 30 May 2008 at 10:02 am

Page 1 of 1 :

New comment

Name:

Email:

Location: (please select a country) none United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

URL:

0/2000

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Type the characters you see in the image below:

+ terms & conditions - terms & conditions

Comments on MercatorNet are moderated. They should be brief, preferably no more than 300 words. Messages that abuse others, have objectionable content, or contain commercial content or links will not be displayed. Comments which are thematically repetitive will not necessarily be displayed. Comments may be edited lightly for grammar, spelling and length.