Sheila Gribben Liaugminas | Wednesday, 26 September 2007

Fear religion: CNN’s message to the nation

Christiane Amanpour had a clear message in her three-part series on CNN: worshipping God creates scary people.

The drama of incited emotions relating to religion was elaborately crafted to fill television screens for six hours during CNN’s mini-series "God’s Warriors", but the drama has only increased among the viewing public since it aired, and those six hours have stretched into an ongoing backlash against the program. Actually, both programs: the television series, and the mission of implanting a message about religion in the minds of world viewers.

The language is of "political theology" which, given an opportunity for progression, threatens Western democracy with a looming theocracy.

From the beginning, CNN’s chief international correspondent Christiane Amanpour set out to examine the actions and motivations of religious extremists in Judaism, Islam and Christianity. And that, in itself, is a "what’s wrong with this picture?" snapshot of a world-class news network inserting itself as a driving force in shaping culture and directing politics. If you can equate any religious fervor with all religious fervor, you can instill fear of religion in the minds of the "common" people. If you instill fear in people of a "theocracy" being imposed on them by leaders who are faithful to their religious values, you can control the way they think and vote.

And that, in brief, is the "God’s Warriors" program.

Just two days before, the New York Times Sunday magazine carried a long, in-depth essay titled "The Politics of God" by Mark Lilla, author of The Stillborn God: Religion, Politics and the Modern Man. The essay framed the question of God’s place in society as a sweeping picture of moral equivalence between things that are not equivalent, which Amanpour did with the same gravity in "God’s Warriors". Which, by the way, began airing two days later. Both of these major media institutions used their considerable weight to lead people into suspicion and fear of fervent religious belief. The language is of "political theology" which, given an opportunity for progression, threatens Western democracy with a looming theocracy.

It’s a sinister program, and people have caught on. In the immediate aftermath of CNN’s first night’s episode of "God’s Warriors" on the extremists in Judaism, bloggers and columnists jumped into the cyber-arena and began denouncing the distortions and selective bias in the episode. The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) issued a report stating: "While in reality Jewish ‘terrorism’ is virtually non-existent, the program magnifies at length the few instance of [Jewish] violence," and compared them to "violent jihadist Muslim campaigns" though no comparison is valid "either in numbers of perpetrators engaged or in the magnitude of death and destruction wrought."

The Jewish audience was incensed by Amanpour’s attention to critics of Israel with no counterbalance, emphasis on the false analogy of extremism among religions. Liberal activist Sharon Cobb, a former contributor to the "NBC Nightly News" and MSNBC online contributor, wrote on her own blog about the fundamental error of the series. "[T]he extremists in Judaism and Christianity are widely condemned within the Jewish and Christian communities, and acts of terror by Jews and Christians are almost non-existent… Orthodox Jews only make up about 10 per cent of the Jewish population, and ultra-Orthodox extremists are relatively rare, And even among the ultra-Orthodox, I am not familiar with any who think killing an innocent person is justified. "

The second night was about extremists in Islam. General reaction in this same public arena was that Amanpour handled this particular topic with utmost fairness. One knowledgeable Middle East observer and writer, on a History News Network blog, called the episode "a politically-correct absurdity" in which "Amanpour made a ridiculous stab at moral equivalence."

And that’s the danger in this type of "journalism". In the public mind, seeds of doubt and fear are planted by buzzwords and false analogies. Comparing Christian modesty and chastity advocates to the Taliban is more than ridiculous. It’s insidious. But that occurred in the third segment, "God’s Christian Warriors". It began by crediting – or blaming – Rev. Jerry Falwell with thrusting religion into politics and elevating "the religious right." In fact, nearly all of that two-hour episode featured Christian activism in political and legal affairs, trying to restore order to the culture and government of America.

Media Research Center’s Robert Knight wrote in an analysis: "The message at times is so ham-handed during the political segments that anyone with even the slightest skepticism of CNN’s motive should see through it. Ominous music, weird camera angles and one-sided portrayals of key issues are standard fare." In fact, the profiles Amanpour featured were evangelicals, and mostly preachers delivering fired up sermons to large scale congregations using stadiums, arenas, sound systems and large screens at times. The episode followed some activists through their calls on politicians and prayer vigils at courthouses, but the picture was framed by Amanpour’s narrative on this activism posing an ominous threat to America.

But she missed the obvious. They were participating in America’s legal and political system exactly as it was intended by the Founders, as a representative republic, with citizen involvement. She missed the pre-Jerry Falwell political civil rights activism of Dr. Martin Luther King and other Christians, and she totally missed Catholic social justice and the involvement of the roughly 70 million strong Catholic community in the US in the pro-life movement. She did highlight the powerful impact of Roe v. Wade on galvanizing Christians. She just failed to mention the Catholic involvement, which is considerable.

The History News Network writer notes the obvious that any viewer could see. In this array of vigorous activism, "isn’t it amazing that these Christian ‘warriors’ are using the legal system to try to effect change -- rather than flying airplanes into buildings?" But "why does CNN seem obsessed with equating Christian fundamentalists with Muslim ones?" 

The answer is simple: to instill fear of religion, and fear of voting for a leader who is informed by their faith.

The good news is, all these people of one faith or another are conducting their own dramatic series of discussions and debates and informative presentations in the arena of ideas available to them. CNN indicated that the network, and Christiane Amanpour, were following public reaction and sensibilities carefully and making final edits to the series as they felt necessary. But they pressed ahead with the message of moral equivalence, and that is so far from true, it’s another case of "the emperor’s clothes" fable becoming a reality in modern media.

In the end, "God’s Warriors" stated that Judaism, Christianity and Islam all believe their religions have the answers for an ordered society. And they do each believe that. But, in spite of the tendentious treatment of Christians in the third and final episode, it was clear that they believe the path to pursuing a just order is through the courts, the government offices, and through prayer.

This seems to pose a threat to some of the major media. The question is not one of whether to elect someone who holds moral values, but rather whose values will prevail?

The great and recently deceased Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger wrote a best-selling book called The Choice of God. In a recent tribute to the prelate and his writings, scholar George Weigel recalled an insight perfectly poignant here, to this ongoing debate. "Cardinal Lustiger, who wrote with great insight about worship and prayer, knew that at the heart of culture is cult. Everyone worships; the question is whether the object of our worship is a worthy one."

Sheila Gribben Liaugminas is an Emmy Award winning journalist who reported for Time magazine for more than 20 years. Until recently, she hosted the popular national radio shows The Right Questions and Issues and Answers on Relevant Radio. She blogs at InforumBlog.com.

Comments (42)

Dust Buster said...

Hey Christiane:

I’ve got your equivalence right here. Take a look at this list of Muslim murder sprees (i.e., violent terrorist attacks). Thousands of them since 9-11-01 alone.

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/TheList.htm

When it’s even possible to compile a database like this of Christian or Jewish atrocities visited on non-combatants in the name of God—a list so stark and repetitive it reads like a medical registry tracking the spread of a disease—then we can talk about equivalence. Silly little girl.

United States | Saturday, 29 September 2007 at 5:16 am

mary ann said...

David Page said, “The history of the last 2,000 years is littered with the bodies of people killed by Bible believing Christians.”

I would add that the last 100 years has seen the largest numbers of Christians killed EVER in a 100 year period. These Christians were martyred for their belief, not because they instituted violence.

David, the godless atheistic regimes of Adolph Hitler and Joseph Stalin killed more people in the last century than even the WORSE Christians could have murdered.

The Communists are still at it in China, Cuba, and North Korea. Perhaps you should remember the grand numbers of godless who continue to kill today.

-- | Saturday, 29 September 2007 at 12:45 pm

David Page said...

Mary Ann,

I did mention Communism and Fascism (Stalin and Hitler) in my original post. You have failed to mention the 2 to 3 million women and girls mutilated and burned during the Witch Hunts. I’m sure your familiar with Exodus 22:18 which says “Thou shall not suffer a Witch yo live”. How do you interpret that passage?
During the 100 Years War, Catholic and Protestant armies slaughtered civilian populations with abandon. Later, Jews and Unitarians had to flee for there lives to Muslim controlled parts of Europe to avoid Christian persecution. That’s why there there are Unitarian churches in Transylvania today.
Right up to the 20th century Jewish populations were decimated by raging mobs of Christians. For centuries Ghetto streets ran with Jewish blood.
We all know what problems the world is facing today because of Muslim fundamentalism. They are almost beyond my understanding. But they follow a pattern that has become all too familiar over the centuries. Fundamentalists, it seems, are all cut from the same cloth.
I listen to Christian radio stations and I am sometimes appalled by what I hear. I hear a desperation to keep women in the inferior role. I hear hear their insistence on maintaining their perceived right to persecute homosexuals. I hear perpetual and mindless war mongering. They talk about Jesus but they have never really listened to Him.
I look forward to your reply.

United States | Sunday, 30 September 2007 at 12:31 am

Mariusz Wesolowski said...

“You have failed to mention the 2 to 3 million women and girls mutilated and burned during the Witch Hunts.”

This is a persistent but clearly absurd Wiccan/feminist myth. In fact, the number of victims did not exceed 150,000 at the highest estimate (most serious researches believe it was really about a half of this number), one-quarter of them were not women but men, and the majority of witch trials ending in a death sentence had been carried by Protestants, not Catholics. But propagandically useful stories die hard.
For more reliable information see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch-hunt#Number_of_executions

Canada | Sunday, 30 September 2007 at 12:31 pm

Mariusz Wesolowski said...

Oh, one more thing:

“During the 100 Years War, Catholic and Protestant armies slaughtered civilian populations with abandon.”

During the Hundred Years War Protestantism does not yet exist. One should know history well in order to talk about it.

Canada | Sunday, 30 September 2007 at 1:05 pm

David Page said...

Mariusz,
You cherrypicked my post. You chose to respond to the only part of it you thought you could refute. Because records have been destroyed, lost, or purged, 150,000 is much too low a figure. There are estimates much higher than mine. By the way, where records exist, women account for more than 90% of the murdered.
I find it interesting that you blame women for inflating the numbers. You call it a “Wiccan/feminist myth”. Why do you feel the need to minimize the death toll?
I agree that far more women were murdered by Protestants than by Catholics. The Catholics, however, got the ball rolling. They also were responsible for a little foible called the Inquisition. That slaughter of innocents lasted for almost 1,000 years. Got any numbers on that death toll?
What’s bothering the religious conservatives, Muslim and Christian alike, is the prospect of dealing with women as equals. Do you think misogyny doesn’t exist in the Catholic Church? The successes in the struggle for womens rights are the reason for the resurgence of conservative religion. All this Christian and Muslim whining about declining morals is just a good, old fashioned backlash against womens’ rights.

United States | Sunday, 30 September 2007 at 2:47 pm

David Page said...

I’m sorry Mariusz, I meant the 30 Years War. Do you think the dead will mind my mistake?

United States | Sunday, 30 September 2007 at 3:03 pm

Mariusz Wesolowski said...

David,

Sentimental rhetoric, agenda-driven estimates and glaring errors have no place in an objective debate. I cannot speak for the dead but I’m sure the living must reject them if they want to be considered intelligent human beings. And my “need to minimize the (fictitious) death toll” comes from my respect for the factual truth, the only factor that really matters in analysing history.

And yes, I got the numbers on the death toll of the Inquisition (incidentally, there were two main Inquisition tribunals, Spanish and papal, and neither one of them “lasted for almost 1,000 years”.) Contrary to the propagandistic “black legend”, the Spanish Inquisition, in its 356 years of existence, sentenced to death between 1 and 2 percent of those it investigated, which meant between 2,000 and 3,000 people. Also, roughly 3/4 of its activities took place within its first 50 years (source: Susan McCarthy Meliore, “The Spanish Inquisition,” Chelsea House Publishers: Philadelphia, 2002, page 103.). The record of the medieval/papal Inquisition is not easy to summarise in the same way because of its complex character and chronological-geographical discontinuity, thus any attempt at estimating the number of its victims must be unreliable. If you know of any facts to the contrary, David, make sure to mention them - quoting the sources - in your reply.

Canada | Monday, 1 October 2007 at 2:57 am

Mariusz Wesolowski said...

Speaking of women’s rights: In the past, when Christianity had been the ruling ideology, inquisitors and witch hunters killed temporary bodies in order to save immortal souls from eternal damnation. In our times we kill millions of unborn babies in the name of the ruling ideology of individual rights. Different ideologies, same results. (I wonder what people will say about our priorities two hundred years from now?) If we condemn killing in principle, we must condemn abortion as
well. Do you condemn abortion, David? (And, please, remember: if you try to consider aborted foetuses - contrary to the medical findings - not fully human, that’s exactly what the Nazis said about the Jews...)

Canada | Monday, 1 October 2007 at 5:13 am

David Fairthorne said...

Having no religious faith, I can perhaps approach this topic without prejudice. I think Christiane Amanpour’s main point was that some proponents of all three religions aggressively seek political advantage. That would be hard to deny.

More controversial was her relatively sympathetic view of all three religions. She interviewed Karen Armstrong, a one-time Catholic nun, and a reputed apologist for religions in general, including Islam. I would be more inclined to say that Islam is the most militant of the three monotheistic religions, at least in the present day.

Allah commanded the prophet Muhammad to take up arms and fight for his religion, which he did with great success, thanks in part to God’s helpful intervention. I get the impression that most modern day Muslims take the word of the Qur’an more literally than most Jews or Christians take their holy books, and that’s what makes Islam the greater threat.

Canada | Monday, 1 October 2007 at 5:50 am

charles nixon said...

To CA from CN - one scary person to another: poppy cock

Charles

Canada | Monday, 1 October 2007 at 9:13 am

David Page said...

I agree with David Fairthorne that Islam, in the present day, is the greater threat. I think is because fundamentalist Christians exist largely in secular democracies. These secular societies limit the damage the fundamentalists can do.

United States | Monday, 1 October 2007 at 12:24 pm

David Page said...

Mariusz,
The dead I referred to were those killed during the
30 years war. I never said anything about the number
killed by the various Inquisitions. I’ll take your word for it that many were just tortured and released. What’s your point?

United States | Monday, 1 October 2007 at 12:36 pm

David Page said...

Mariusz,
All abortions are a tragedy. Some are necessary but more are not. I’m not a woman so I will never have to make that unfortunate choice. My wife and I have three children and we haven’t killed any of them.
I don’t believe the morning after pill, especially after a rape, is in any way immoral. I find it amusing that social conservatives want every child to be born but don’t think they have any responsibility for them after that. Did you know that, in America, abortions went down every year under the Clinton administration? They have gone up every year under the Bush administration.
The idea you have put forth that the horrors perpetrated against women by Inquisitors and witch finders was justified by their salvation is just sick and delusional.
Don’t you think Christians would be better served if they concentrated less on the Ten Commandments (Old Testament) and more on the Beatitudes (Actual words of Jesus)? Doesn’t the Parable of the Prostitute negate the condemnations of the Old Testament?

United States | Monday, 1 October 2007 at 1:23 pm

RandomlySane said...

Basically, God’s Warrior’s just points out to me that everyone thinks they are right (Jew, Christian, Muslim), and those who have less to lose are willing to fight more than those who are comfortable. I don’t need to defend my beliefs or belittle others’. That said, it is easy to be scared and natural to be wary of someone or something I don’t understand. Just human nature.

United States | Monday, 1 October 2007 at 1:39 pm

Page 2 of 3 :  <  1 2 3 >

New comment

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:
0/2000
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?
Type the characters you see in the image below:

free updates

Email