commentComment (18) | emailEmail | printPrint | del.icio.usdel.icio.us | technoratiTechnorati | Share
Andrew Byrne | Friday, 18 May 2007

Lessons from the Hogwarts threesome

The neglected virtue of friendship is skilfully portrayed in the Harry Potter series.

As well as having millions of readers the Harry Potter books also have their share of critics, some from a religious angle. Some fervent Christians have seen the books as dangerous because they deal with wizards, witches and magic. It would be good to point out to these critics that a serious ban on witchcraft would end up jettisoning large areas of Western culture: what about fairy tales? Hans Christian Andersen? Fairy Godmothers? Peter Pan? Merlin? Certainly the Harry Potter books deal with magic, but do they make children turn to magic and witchcraft? There seems to be no evidence of this. As the author, J.K. Rowling, said in a television interview, she keeps very close to her readers and not one has said to her that, due to Harry Potter, they have taken up magic or witchcraft.

The books have been immensely popular. Why? Not because of marketing – the first printing was tiny. Sales came from readers passing on the message. Is it just that they are "a good read"? They are certainly that.

A closer reading of the books reveals a panoply of virtues and moral values.

But there is something more. The books are popular because they have a deep humanity as their background. In a recent article, Mary Kenny pointed out that Jane Austen’s novels have become immensely popular in recent years, because they portray all the values people secretly admire but can’t admit to openly for fear of being considered politically incorrect, values like marriage, respect, modesty, politeness... People can get away with their admiration in the case of Jane Austen because she is considered to be "from another age"... Perhaps something similar applies to Harry Potter, where the "another" is the fictional environment of magic.

Our present social climate in the West is in danger of becoming aggressively secularist. By this I mean that today’s popularised values are based on a rejection of religion (as something antiquated, prejudiced, unhealthy and unprogressive). Secularists see religion as a dying but not quite dead phenomenon. They see it as their job to eliminate the last vestiges of religion, especially Christianity, from society.

At first sight, the Harry Potter books have nothing to say on this subject. They make little reference to Christianity. Christmas and Easter are mentioned but no reference is made to the religious content of those feasts. However, in the light of recent attempts in some parts of Britain to turn Christmas into a "winterval", it may be worth mentioning that neither is that religious content rejected or derided in the Harry Potter books. An analogy can be drawn here with Tolkien’s approach in The Lord of the Rings.

I suggest, nevertheless, that a closer reading of the books reveals a panoply of virtues and moral values some of which I will now try to describe. Before I do so, let me utter a word of warning: as I write, we have not yet reached the end of the Harry Potter series. Each time a new novel has come out, I have wondered whether the author will manage to maintain the tone and standards she has set and kept till now. So far, in my opinion, she has passed this test with flying colours – not at all easy to do when she is writing about children in their teens.

In this article I will refer principally to the fourth book in the series, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.

Imagine for a moment what these books could have been like. If you read the Arts and Culture pages of today’s newspapers, their reviews of books, plays, television, you get a constant flow of dysfunctional situations. The general message is one of depression at the state of modern society. In Harry Potter you get a completely different world view. Instead of a general mush of gloom and self-indulgence, you have a world of clear cut values. These values are not sugary and naive. The world Rowling depicts is very much a battleground, evil and good are locked in struggle, and often it seems that evil is getting the upper hand. Not a few succumb to its pressures. Or prefer to bury their head in the sand. But good wins out in the end.

We see this world through the eyes of a young orphan. He has a deprived home background (the Dursleys household, where he has been living and treated unlovingly since his parents were murdered shortly after his birth). From this background he has been liberated by being given a place at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Here he finds people who understand him and who offer him a home, a double home, both at school and in the holidays (the home of the Weasley family, a large and poor family, parents and seven children, all of whom have been students at Hogwarts).

Friendship

In this situation we see one of the principal attractions of the Harry Potter books: friendship at work. Love between human beings, we are told in moral theology, can be subdivided into the "love of concupiscence", where you are loving for your own benefit; and the "love of benevolence", where you seek primarily the good and profit of the person you love. Where there is this love of benevolence between two persons we call it friendship. For true friendship, three things are required: a mutual (both-ways) love of benevolence; the recognition by both sides of that love; and a certain communication between the two people. Here is a description of friendship from Scripture: "A faithful friend is a sturdy shelter: he that has found one has found a treasure. There is nothing so precious as a faithful friend and no scales can measure his excellence. A faithful friend is an elixir of life; and those who fear the Lord will find him".

Friendship is the relation between the three heroes of the Harry Potter tales, Harry himself, Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. Rowling portrays their friendship in a most positive way. In The Goblet of Fire the protagonists are 14 years old. Their friendship started three years previously and it grows and develops through the successive volumes.

Harry and Ron – interrupted friendship

Let’s see some of the aspects of friendship Rowling displays. One of its principal aspects, in this volume, is the temporary break in the friendship between Harry and Ron. This is caused by Ron perceiving a lack of truthfulness from Harry. He thinks Harry has lied to him in denying that he had a part in being selected for the Triwizard competition. Likewise Harry, who though flattered by the selection is also unnerved by it, feels let down by Ron’s not trusting him. After this we read, "the next few days were some of Harry’s worst at Hogwarts". He is without Ron’s support. But he stubbornly refuses to seek it. Neither he nor Ron will take the first step to reconciliation. Interestingly, they can agree on some things (for example, their unjust treatment at Prof Snape’s hands) without the friendship being restored. This break in friendship makes both quite miserable. It is Hermione who tries to restore their friendship, at first without success, because of their stubbornness. Before that, they don’t want to see each other: thus Harry wears his Invisibility Cloak so as not to be seen by Ron at Hogsmeade.

The reconciliation occurs when Ron realises, after Harry has defeated the Horntail dragon, that Harry has been telling the truth all along. The enmity melts: "It was as though the last few weeks had never happened". Hermione bursts into tears at seeing Harry and Ron reunited, and "before either of them could stop, she had given both of them a hug, and dashed away, now positively howling". Harry and Ron’s relief being together again, interestingly, is expressed in Ron’s comment about Hermione’s emotional behaviour. She’s mad: "Barking". Two other comments: Harry now reunited to Ron prizes this far higher than human success: "Ron’s indignation on his behalf was worth about a hundred points to him... his heart felt lighter than air". And three pages later: "Harry couldn’t believe how happy he felt; he had Ron back on his side".

Friendship opens up to others

In all this stage of the friendship, Hermione shows greater maturity, perhaps because she was not directly involved in the quarrel. Her level headedness is shown when she reminds the others that the whole purpose of the Triwizard Tournament is to foster friendship between all three schools of wizardry.

This is a great truth about friendship: when it is genuine, it expands to reach out to other people. Thus Harry is a friend to Cedric, despite the fact that they are rivals in the Tournament. This friendship leads Harry to give Cedric the tip-off about the dragons, a favour which Cedric later returns. Their friendship culminates both in the race to capture the Triwizard Bowl, where they prove that friendship is more valuable to them than victory in the competition. Later, Harry will make a super-human effort to bring Cedric’s body back to his family. Harry’s friendship is not confined to Ron and Hermione. He has numerous other friends: Hagrid, Dumbledore, Miss McGonagall, Moaning Myrtle, Neville, Krum, Dobby the house-elf...

Friendship and love

The relationship between friendship and "love" is also skilfully portrayed by Rowling. Here we use the word "love" in the sense of the relationship between a boy and a girl (or a man and a woman), which can end up with them "falling in love". Modern society (as portrayed by the media, etc.) has tended to forget about the existence of "friendship" and to say that ultimately all relationships between two human beings can be seen as "love". One of the key differences between friendship and love is that love is exclusive (one boy, one girl; one man, one woman), whereas friendship, though personal (it is not a general feeling of good will to all, but something between concrete persons) is open to many. There is of course a degree of truth in the idea that love is at the heart of all good interpersonal relationships. After all, Christianity sums up the duties of man as "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart (...). This is the (...) first commandment. And a second is like it, You shall love your neighbour as yourself".

However, by forgetting friendship, modern society turns all these relationships into sexual relationships. This has a double damaging effect: if its views are followed, they end up pushing people into having a physical intimacy, a sexual intimacy, which is inappropriate; and they give no value to simple friendship.

Rowling, by going back to a more "natural" description of how human beings behave, does us a great service. "Love" as a sexual relationship is something very special. It also has elements which are outside our control: we find ourselves "falling in love" without meaning to. "It just happened". This is more or less what happens to Harry with Cho. Also, there is all the question of the Triwizard Ball – and the embarrassment of the boys having to find themselves a girl to invite to dance with them. In this search, Harry and Ron totally overlook Hermione, until they find that she has already been invited by Neville.

Only then do they "discover" that she is a girl. Ron realises: "Hermione, Neville’s right, you are a girl." "Oh, well spotted," she said acidly. She finds herself paired with Viktor Krum, who has been following her for weeks, spending hours in the library which he would not otherwise have done, just to be close to her. Hermione has no special feeling for Krum, but is experimenting what it is like to be attractive to another. Of course, we know that friendship and love are not opposed to each other. And, eventually, in Heaven, where exclusivity, not personality, ceases, they will become totally one.

Friendship and distinguishing between boys and girls

But at this stage in the books, what is more real are the friendships, and this too is an insight we’re grateful to Rowling for. Friendship can develop into love, as we half suspect is happening between Harry and Hermione. What is good is that Rowling keeps the space for friendship "open".

One way of doing this, which is worth pointing out, is the practical separation in Hogwarts school, between boys and girls, giving space for respect to operate. Separate dormitories (though, interestingly, we are never told what goes on in the girls’ dormitories, since the story is told principally from the point of view of Harry). By keeping boys and girls separate in that way, not forcing them, all the time, to be together, Rowling creates space for each of them to be themselves, without having to put on an act (such as we see in the Triwizard Ball, where both boys and girls change, in the presence of the opposite sex: girls become stunningly beautiful, boys awkward and timid). The description of Viktor’s partner reminds us of that of Eliza at the ball in My Fair Lady:

"His [Harry’s] eyes fell instead on the girl next to Krum. His jaw dropped.

It was Hermione.

But she didn’t look like Hermione at all. She had done something with her hair; it was no longer bushy, but sleek and shiny, and twisted up into an elegant knot at the back of her head. She was wearing robes made of a floaty, periwinkle-blue material, and she was holding herself differently, somehow – or maybe it was merely the absence of the twenty or so books she usually had slung over her back. She was also smiling – rather nervously, it was true...".

Love between Harry and Hermione

Perhaps the most beautiful relationship in the book is that between Harry and Hermione. It combines friendship and love but, being an implicit rather than explicit relationship – explicitly, Harry’s best friend is Ron – it can develop quietly and without the exclusive aspects of love.

Let’s see some of the examples in the book. When the Veela dancers appear, sweeping the boys’ hearts away, Hermione is angry with Harry, rather than with Ron, for letting himself get fascinated. This implies that Hermione has a higher regard for Harry. In trouble, Harry speeds to the library to ask Hermione for help. "Hermione, I need you to help me." "What do you think I’ve been trying to do, Harry?" she whispered back: an example of love working away unassumingly in the background. After Harry’s triumph over the Horntail dragon, Hermione and Ron come to see him, "Harry, you were brilliant!" Hermione said squeakily. There were fingernail marks on her face where she had been clutching it in fear. When Ron and Harry are reconciled, Hermione gave both of them a hug, and dashed away; afraid perhaps of having let her feelings get the better of her

At the Yuletide Ball, officially Harry is with Parvati and Hermione with Krum. But instead Harry and Hermione end up together, and relaxed, so much so that Hermione can explain to Harry how she had her hair done: "She confessed to Harry that she had used liberal amounts of Sleekeazys Hair Potion for the ball, ‘but it’s way too much bother to do every day,’ she said matter-of-factly". Hermione can confide in Harry, he’s a friend not a "rival" and there is no "threat".

When it comes to retrieving "the thing people will miss most" from the lake, Harry is asked to retrieve Ron, officially his best friend. However, when Harry gets down there, he finds Hermione tied up as well. The mermen try to prevent Harry from freeing Hermione, but he retorts: "She’s my friend too!". Harry does not let his heart be bamboozled by narrow rules, even if the keepers of the rules penalise him. He saves Hermione and, incidentally, Gabrielle, Fleur’s sister, too. After the event, Krum is disappointed to see Hermione cheering for Harry, rather than for himself.

Rita Skeeter then writes an article in Witch magazine trying to stir things up, saying that Harry’s heartache, Hermione, has left him for Krum. This leads to an ongoing situation in which Harry has to declare several times, and to different people, that Hermione is not his girl friend. However, a different story comes out when Harry has to fight against the Dementor and the secret is "to summon the happiest thought he could" – the thought he summons is that of celebrating with Ron and Hermione. True, the seeking of Cho’s admiration is still in Harry thoughts – he imagines what it would be like to win the Cup and gain her admiration. But the genuine affection is between him and Hermione, who at the end "did something she had never done before, and kissed him on the cheek".

*****

These books are a good read. They are entertaining but they also enhance and enrich us as human beings. And they are open – if we wish to see them so – to Christianity. When we read books we should look for enrichment. Because experience (including that coming from reading) never leaves us untouched. It either enriches or degrades. Literary studies are good for us if we tackle them in this way, seeking enhancement and enrichment.

Andrew Byrne is a Catholic priest in London.

commentComment (18) | emailEmail | printPrint | del.icio.usdel.icio.us | technoratiTechnorati | Share
Comments to Lessons from the Hogwarts threesome have been closed. Thanks to everyone who contributed to the discussion.
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
search engine optimization said... -- | Fri, 19 Sep 2008 at 12:31 pm

You’re really thankful for this post


Gerthrude said... Philippines | Wed, 27 Jun 2007 at 7:30 pm

It’s too long but it’s cool!!!!!I really like this article coz’ it makes me feel exciting, it teaches me a true value of true friendship…
I learned something fabulous that make me proud of myself…
I am hoping for more articles for you to produce…


M.G. said... United States | Sun, 10 Jun 2007 at 7:09 am

Very interesting article! Unfortunately I have to tell you that J.K. Rowling has said in interviews that there is nothing romantic between Harry and Hermione, and the romance exists instead between Ron and Hermione.


Andrew Helmers said... Canada | Fri, 8 Jun 2007 at 1:51 am

Excellent article! Although I disagree about who Hermione has fallen for, I do agree that Rowling manages to guide her readers to some understanding of true love vs. superficial obsession. One other insight that is valuable for her young readers is in the fifth book, where Harry learns that he needs his friends just as much as they need him. He moves from a self-centered, moody brat at the beginning of book 5 to the realization (600 pages later) that unless he learns to rely on his friends for their support he is going to make serious mistakes. Harry matures a great deal in book 6 as well, and I look forward to book 7, where I’m sure that friendship will continue to play a central role in this series.


Katie said... Iraq | Tue, 5 Jun 2007 at 9:10 pm

Yay! one of the few accurate and pleasant to read articles these days!


J.R. Cruz said... Guam | Thu, 24 May 2007 at 4:33 pm

Response to Charlotte Hoare from New Zealand:

As with the author of this article, Fr. Andrew Byrne, I am only privy to the five books, and have restricted my comments to those five. Like a two year old, I preface most of my inquiries with one word....’why?’

Why does Harry stay with not-so-nice relatives?
Why does Harry want to attend Hogwart?
Why does Harry seek the stone?
Why does Harry fear Lord Voldemort?
Why are there 3 dorms in Hogwart?
Why did Harry’s parents have to die?
.....and countless of hundreds of whys.....

In other words Charlotte, I read with a sense of naiveness. I give the author the benefit and courtesy, that what they write, is worth reading. However, with even a generous and liberal interpretation on my part, I could not help but feel uneasy...very uneasy of the message being conveyed throughout the HP series and very much confirmed by your own words:

‘Granted, Rowling’s ultimate ‘good’ isn’t portrayed as God- but surely we can appreciate that given today’s moral climate, Rowling has done some good groundwork in preparation for the moral development of children, and even many adults’-Charlotte Hoare

Again, unless it is revealed in the 6th book, I fail to see exactly the ‘moral development’. If what you claim is true, that this moral development can be extracted by both children and adults, then it must be a UNIVERSAL morale, that both child AND adult can clearly recognize. But this is clearly not the case even according to the author of this article:

‘I suggest, nevertheless, that a closer reading of the books reveals a panoply of virtues and moral values some of which I will now try to describe.’-Fr. Byrne

If indeed one finds it necessary to attempt to describe the ‘panoply of virtues’, then maybe it is NOT UNIVERSAL hence, not applicable to both children and adults. Again, I argue, the friendship in the HP series is ‘youthful endeavor’ (see Fr. Byrne’s list of friendships in the above article). I would argue furthrer that HP’s virtue of friendship is a result of or the cause of some sort of event or interaction.  However, friendship, in LOTR is the effect. In other words, good triumph over evil BECAUSE of friendship. This is one of short comings of HP and Rowling’s fails to establish (again I refer only to books1-5). However, if Rowling’s aim to categorize the ‘ultimate good’ and friendship as being relative,then she succeeds.

In closing Charlotte, I enjoyed Rowling’s books for what they are. But if it was my discretion to introduce a young mind to wonders of literature and in your words ‘good groundwork in preparation for the moral development of children’ I would not choose the HP series.

Best regards,
J.R. Cruz


Mars Hamoy said... Philippines | Thu, 24 May 2007 at 4:30 pm

Thanks. I’ll pass this on to my brothers and sisters—for their guiding their children.


Charlotte Hoare said... New Zealand | Thu, 24 May 2007 at 8:49 am

Regarding Cruz’s comments above:
‘HP struggles more with power and self-interest than with Christian values and virtues.LOTR balances power and self-interest with an aim towards the greater good.’

Harry Potter has very little self-interest or power to gain in taking on evil (so far he’s lost his parents, friends, godparent and now Dumbledore- to my utter devestation). Yet he has stepped up to the challenge of defeating Voldemort. HP initially rebelled at the prophecy of book 5, in fact he got downright aggressive. Yet by book 6 he has accepted responsibilty for the task appointed to him and has assimilated dumbledore’s teaching that ‘what is easy is not always right.’ Harry Potter teaches that freedom is not so much about choosing what is convenient but what is required for the good to prevail, even at great personal sacrifice. How easy would it be for him to cast down the burden of pursuing the good! Granted, Rowling’s ultimate ‘good’ isn’t portrayed as God- but surely we can appreciate that given today’s moral climate, Rowling has done some good groundwork in prepartion for the moral development of children, and even many adults!


J.R. Cruz said... Guam | Tue, 22 May 2007 at 11:08 pm

It is my opinion that any ‘analogy’ between Rowling’s Harry Potter series and Tolkein’s Lord of the Rings trilogy are few in terms of virtue, friendship, and Christian values. The danger of the Harry Potter series is not the use of magic and wizardry, but that it treats magic and wizardry as neutral elements in the battle between good and evil...quite different from the J.R.R. Tolkein’s The Lord of the Rings. True, there are a ‘panoply of virtues’ in the Harry Potter series, but is this a good thing?

Throughout the Harry Potter series (HP) magic and wizardry are tools for which the ends justify the means. Be it the invisible cloak, the sorcerer stone, flying broom etc… The theme through most of the readings is inner strength and ultimate good comes from one’s inner self. Moreover, through trial and error one can overcome even the most evil of evils. The virtues are thinly veiled and when pushed to expound on ‘what is good’, the books are found wanting. Friendship was a youthful endeavor.

In Tolkein’s Lord of the Rings (LOTR) there is a distinct moral theme....the means must justify ends. The One ring, Sauron’s ring, can only wrought evil. It cannot be ‘weilded’ to do good. Even the three Elvish rings are subservant to the One. Virtue, rightly understood, was measured in ‘what is good’. Friendship was an extention of one’s being.

One can discern Christian values in HP and LOTR to a certain degree. It is the hope that in doing so, it will lead us to a deeper undertanding on why we are Christians. However, HP struggles more with power and self-interest than with Christian values and virtues. LOTR balances power and self-interest with an aim towards the greater good.


Michelle Martin said... Canada | Tue, 22 May 2007 at 10:02 am

One of the things my kids also picked up on in the books is the positive and warm portrayal of a large family in the Weasleys-- this is important to them, coming from a large family thenmselves.


andrew byrne said... United Kingdom | Mon, 21 May 2007 at 8:06 pm

For Therese M.
I agree entirely – we need to appeal to that better side of teenagers, which I have no doubt is there (perhaps that is why it is said that they often find it hard to speak to their elders, because we are too “worldly-wise”?).

For Tim Golden
Yes, I agree there are aspects of the Harry Potter books that may not be wholly acceptable. I think that whenever we read a book we need to be discerning and need to teach others to be so. This applies even to very good books – such as spiritual reading books. On the other hand, I feel that we should always “be ourselves” when we read. By this I don’t mean we have to be “deadly serious”; but we shouldn’t switch off our values, beliefs. And therefore, even reading light fiction, we should (at least semi-consciously) be looking for values and improvement. This means that authors too have the responsibility to bring those elements into their writings. I realise this might not be a fashionable view; but I think it is a view which can guide one to assess what is worth reading; and that the opposite view (that we can, and even should, “switch off” when we relax) betrays a “double-life” approach, which is not a good thing.

For Margaret-Maria Dudley
Yes, I find the films a bit what I would call “noisy”. But I think if one has read the books then one can read into the films more than at first meets the eye.
But, of course, Harry Potter isn’t everything and a lot of good people have never read the books. When I first used the article I wrote, as a talk to a small parish group (several young people had told the parish priest they were excited by the topic, but none came – perhaps because it was in a parish context and they felt they would be out of place), not a single person in the audience had read the books! But I think we had a fruitful discussion about friendship and what to look for in literature.


andrew byrne said... United Kingdom | Mon, 21 May 2007 at 7:43 pm

For Alan McConnell and Athos:
Thanks for those comments:
I must emphasise that I do not consider myself an expert in Harry Potter.
But I have found the books enable me to talk to people who have read them (and who do not share, or do not think they share, my Christian values) about all sorts of human values which are natural but which are not given much consideration by the media these days. In this sense, I feel inclined to say that the “escapism” of Harry Potter can be seen as an “escape from the falsehood of life” as portrayed by anti-life and anti-value media, into the “reality” of getting on with your family and friends. The portrayal of the Weasley family, two happily married parents and seven children (each with their own personality and independence) is in this sense, to my mind, very refreshing.

For MTM – yes I agree entirely that there will be many readers of books coming from all sorts of different angles. I remember reading once that the greatness of Shakespeare is that he can reach out to all sorts of levels of readers (intellectuals and simple folk – I remember once going to a showing of the film “Hamlet” in Nigeria, and how quite a few of the audience who had never heard of Shakespeare took it as a “cowboy” film, well that is what a lot of Shakespeare’s Elizabethan playgoers would have gone to his films for, entertainment). What I do feel a good author does is to have (by and large) a good influence on all his readers, getting them to appreciate the noble aspects of life.


Margaret-Maria Dudley said... Australia | Mon, 21 May 2007 at 1:42 pm

I haven’t read the books, but I have seen the films, which seem to launder out this dimension of the series. This article has prompted me to look into Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, at least.
MMD


Tim Golden said... United Kingdom | Mon, 21 May 2007 at 1:44 am

An interesting piece, Fr Byrne. I applaud unreservedly your central point, highlighting the virtue inherent in the friendship between the characters, and in particular your emphasis on the distinction between friendship and sexual tension, so hard for secularity to grasp. I spend a fair bit of time reading and reviewing books written for children and young people, and true friendship is too rarely found.

I’ll avoid writing an essay here, but I would bring out one point. I don’t believe that the mores of the Harry Potter series are acceptable because of the “fictional environment of magic” but rather because the books are clearly aimed at children. And there’s an unspoken rule which says that children’s books are allowed to present simple moral virtues as such, while books even for young adults and certainly those for adults, are not. Notwithstanding the fact that the apparent audience grows with the age of the characters, the series as a whole has a “Children’s Book” aura about it, which allows it to retain this simple approach although tempered in the later books by a certain amount of adolescent activity.

Time and again, as I read books written for a young adult audience, I ask myself: must a book re-present perceived reality (drug use, general disrespect, rampant teenage sexuality and its automatic corollary - abortion); or might it not be allowed to represent an ideal of what *can* be? Frankly, there are aspects of the Harry Potter canon which I do not find wholly virtuous, but if there had to be a series which sold more than any other ever written, I’d far rather it were this than many others.


Therese M. said... Ireland | Sun, 20 May 2007 at 10:42 pm

Well done Fr. Byrne for such a good article. I am a secondary school teacher and one of my subjects is English. My experience of teaching young teenagers is that they are thirsting for novels that do have values and characters to admire and look up to. But at times it is we the adults who think they want to indulge in doom, gloom and depression. They want none of it, they want to satisfy their need to hope for a good world where they will find good people who will be good role models for them. Neither are they naive - they know there is bad and perhaps even more bad than good but they recognise values like friendship. In fact for most teens friendship is the most important value. We adults could take a leaf from their book. We would do a lot better to encourage them see in the Harry Potter books what Fr Byrne points out so well in his article give them more credit for being discerning in their reading.
Thank you Fr Byrne.
If you ever think of doing out a study guide for Harry Potter I’ll buy it as soon as it is published and encourage the adults I know to read it!!!


Page 1 of 2 :  1 2 >