Motherhood is a day job tooA well argued defence of the most important work mothers engage in: raising happy, well-balanced children. Mothering: A Spiritual and Practical Approach
That grand old war-horse, Sir Winston Churchill, once said, "There is no doubt that it is around the family and the home that all the greatest virtues, the most dominating virtues of human society, are created, strengthened and maintained." Despite these wise words of an elder statesman, it has been the aim of the Labour government in the UK during the ten years of Tony Blair's premiership to get as many mothers as possible into full-time paid work, lured by promises of crèches for babies, nursery places for toddlers and 'wrap-around care' for schoolchildren. It is early days under his successor, Gordon Brown, but as yet there seems to be no discernible difference from his predecessor in this policy. When Frank Field, Labour MP for Birkenhead, a deprived area near Liverpool, remarked not long ago that the growing problem of unruly children was a direct result of their mothers not being at home to bring them up, he was attacked on all sides. So when will government ministers grasp the obvious, and recognise that society benefits from healthy, stable families and that families benefit when mothers raise their own children, especially when they are young? Anna Melchior's thoughtful book is not a political programme, though it has huge political implications; it is a well-argued defence of the most important work that mothers engage in: raising happy, well-balanced children on whose adult emotional maturity society depends. As the author remarks: motherhood is "awesome". Challenging feminists with their own terminology, she describes as "radical feminism" the decision to spend unhurried time (rather than carefully structured "quality" time) with the children you love. To those women who have been led to believe that staying at home is boring and does not stretch them, she replies that motherhood is not wasting one's genius, it is about "using your genius" in "loving, educating and managing" your children and household. It is mothers, not child-minders or state nannies, that transmit the consistent security and love without which children cannot develop into well-adjusted adults. Melchior, a mother of four with a doctorate from Oxford, is convinced that the best childcare settings cannot achieve what mothering in the average family achieves as a matter of course. In support of this contention, she quotes well-known childcare experts such as Penelope Leach and Steve Biddulph, who have publicly admitted that even good state nurseries do not provide their charges with the attention, care and stimulus that they need. For Melchior it is self-evident that "the job of transmitting values to our children cannot be left to strangers." Like a latter-day Joan of Arc, the author swings into battle on behalf of mothers and children, arguing that "you must be there for your baby" if a close and nurturing (and therefore rewarding) bond is to be achieved. She suggests that mothers should not be left in isolation to carry out this demanding vocation; they need support from husbands, relations, neighbours and friends - and society at large. What politicians should be doing is providing the economic wherewithal for mothers to be at home rather than pressured back to the workplace, which is often, she points out, a dull and uninspiring milieu. Mothers who choose to stay at home can feel isolated in lonely suburbs where all the other mothers, seemingly, are in employment. My sister, married to a Swede and who lived for many years in Sweden, found that all the Swedish mothers in her vicinity had put their babies into day care so that, in choosing not to do so, she had many lonely hours on her hands in the company of two very demanding toddlers. To avoid this, Melchior wants mothers properly "reintegrated" into society, a society that respects their worth and which supplements their mothering rather than supplanting it. She advocates a restructuring of the tax system so that a married couple are not, in effect, penalised if only one of them works, and greater flexibility in part-time work for mothers. In case readers feel a tone of self-righteousness to all this, Melchior readily admits her own failings - "unfortunately I rather like harbouring resentment"; she also agrees she is bossy, over-controlling and always right. Coming from atheistic and divorced parents and having watched her mother struggle as a single parent, she herself has floundered with problems in her marriage. Apart from cases of actual abuse, she believes it is always better to work through marital difficulties than opt for divorce, which couples choose often "because they cannot bear to confront their own shortcomings." Now a Catholic her marriage and mothering are underpinned by her faith. Her marriage survived to grow stronger when "a holy priest told me to be kind to my husband and to pray for him." Though she and her husband had "five and a half university degrees between us", they were ignorant of the reality of caring for a baby. Seven days after her first child was born, worn out by sleeplessness and overwhelmed by the task of mothering, she ran away for a few hours. Gradually she began to experience the joy and freedom of creating an environment where her family could flourish. She loves cooking and dislikes prams. This is a humorous, passionate story, written to share the author's own journey of faith and motherhood with other mothers who are short-changed by political propaganda which persuades them that their task can readily be undertaken by others. Francis Philips writes from Bucks in the UK. |
related articles
morebythisauthorfree updates |
Comments (11)
Andrew said...Poland | Saturday, 22 September 2007 at 5:28 am
Sr Joeyanna said...What I picked most from her was her great will power for Good!!
Thanks Mummy!
-- | Saturday, 22 September 2007 at 6:10 am
veronika said...Australia | Saturday, 22 September 2007 at 7:41 am
Anne Wolfe said...Too little attention has been paid to what's best for children, but also what's best for women and men. Committing to a marriage, conceiving and carrying a child, delivering, feeding, taking full responsibility for the well-being of another human being stimulates enormous growth and satisfaction in a receptive mother and father.
My husband and I have been blessed with 10 live children (5 daughters, 5 sons). We both have prestigious degrees and were excellent students (in fact, my husband is a university professor), and yet, we would both say the sphere of our lives where we have learned the most, given the most, received the most, and enjoyed the most has been our family.
(I too have struggled with no other women at home when I had my first 4 children...the only babies in our church for 4 years were ours!)
Perhaps, though, we are too quick to blame radical feminism. After all, no one coerces us to embrace its propositions. As a society, we must have been receptive for such abandonment of the family to occur so rapidly as it has in the US.
Perhaps the answer is simple. Let sceptics see our joy; let them see the family is indeed where our high-IQ genius is developed, where our little ones are civilized, where each one believes he is dearly loved...if we truly give ourselves o the adventure of living, learning, loving, and leaving our children as a precious legacy.
United States | Saturday, 22 September 2007 at 1:15 pm
Ina said...Canada | Saturday, 22 September 2007 at 1:19 pm
Shirley Buxton said...Love the picture of you (?) and your babies. Beautiful.
God bless you abundantly.
United States | Saturday, 22 September 2007 at 1:57 pm
henry andoh said...We always see the difference in our children, whenever she is keeping a job.
Motherhood is supreme. Thank you for this article.
Thank you sweetheart, for the sacrifice you always make.
Nigeria | Sunday, 23 September 2007 at 12:43 am
Laura said...However, I would like to say something to those people who are afraid of having more than 2 children:
1) I understand the fear and repugnance that such a prospect might cause to many people. I have been there myself.
2) My husband and I returned to the Church after we had been married for 5 years and were childless. The grace of God made us see that we should trust Him in this important area. We did and He sent us 5 children.
3)Even with God's help, I was hard for us to adjust to the new role. I became a full time mother,I didn't know how to cook and I had -still do- a very hard time making and following schedules.
My husband and I are intellectuals and our children are artistic!. The high school years were torture for me: homework, after school activities, etc.
In fact our home would have been chosen for the leading article in a publication about family life...
5)Well then, was it worth the pain? YES, YES, YES, YES, YES (one per child, in case you didn't notice)
6) This is our recipe for people who might be afraid of having a larger family: always remember that
a)Children are sent to us by God. He fashions them to fit perfectly in our lives and those of their siblings. He also knows all the details of our lives, from beginning to end, and sends the children to help us and each other when and how we need it.
b)Parenting is no battling a foe but enjoying the antics of wonderful people who can, at times, be somewhat out of control.
c)We must apologize to our children when we treat them as property or extensions of ourselves. This is really the hinge of if all: children will respect us for it while learning a valuable lesson.
d) Prayer is the balm for all difficulties and hurts. God sent us the children so He is committed to help us.
United States | Monday, 24 September 2007 at 1:56 am
J.A. said...As the eldest of 4 children of a stay-at-home mother who decided to be there for us 24/7 since I was about 2, I am thankful for all the motherly care and discipline. One of my favorite childhood memories is the quizzical looks of classmates when I told them that I just had spaghetti for breakfast for no particular reason when they just skipped theirs for the morning. I still occasionally do up to this day!
Philippines | Wednesday, 26 September 2007 at 6:12 pm
That Lesbian Down The Street said...And just something I found interesting... the author apparently "challeng[es] feminists".
I think it's high time that term has been redefined. All too often I see 'femenists' depicted as... well, masculine women. That hardly seems 'femenine' to me. Maybe femenism should have -something- to do with being femenine? Otherwise, we need a new name for the whole power-struggle complex that the old-style femenists seem to want to hang onto. It's just unfair for one term with such stereotypical baggage to apply to anyone who describes themselves as a femenist. I do, but I think it's absolutely idiotic for mothers to never be home with their kids, or that being at home somehow stunts mental growth.
Anyways, just my two-cents. I kinda just really wish people would let mothers make their own decisions regarding their children, instead of constantly offering advice-advice-advice. In my experience, people -ask- for advice when they want it. And that's what friends are for.
-- | Friday, 28 September 2007 at 1:01 am
Elena said...Mexico | Tuesday, 13 November 2007 at 4:04 am
Page 1 of 1 :
New comment