Kevin Ryan | Friday, 3 August 2007

No way to raise a boy

Do boys have to be bored, fat and dumber than their sisters?
The first in a series about educating boys today.

A ten year old boy, whom I watch with an eagle’s eye, is reading The Dangerous Book for Boys by Conn and Hal Iggulden. The book is teaching him how to play poker, build a go-cart from scratch, how to fold a paper glider so that it really flies, to makes a paper water bomb and much, much more. He has found his Holy Grail. Wedged in between the book’s black arts are spirited short essays on heroic battles, good manners and, yes, girls. Be forewarned, gentle reader, this book is definitely not politically correct, and worse, it could turn around a boy’s life.

The 10-year-old I have in my sights is a busy home-schooler whose days and heart are torn between pitching in the town baseball league and his beloved violin. While a leader on the ball field and popular with his mates, I have to admit, he is sort of "out-of-it." When the talk moves from the ballgame to video games, the kid is a wash-out. When the conversations moves on to television, as it does regularly…(television and movies being the lingua franca of boys from six to that ever-moving outer boundary of adolescence)…, the boy is a dunce. He thinks "24" is the definition of a day. He wouldn’t recognise Paris Hilton if she tried to run him over. He’s focused on learning how to step into a pitch and to do something with his violin that I don’t comprehend.

He is clearly out of step with modern boydom. But how and when things changed for boys is hard for me to pin down. Somewhere not too long ago, boys went indoors. When they don’t have their eyes glued to some screen, whether computer, TV, movie or even, yes, cell phone, they are shuffling along alone or in sullen groups at the mall. Building tree huts and shooting at squirrels with beebee guns lost out big time to the latest version of Xbox and the newest action-adventure fantasy at the Cinaplex.

And they look so bored! How can a 12-year-old boy be that bored… unless he has been made so passive with canned pleasure that he doesn’t know what else to do. He has never learned to do anything other than turn on his toys. He doesn’t have the reading habit because DVDs are easier. He doesn’t play outside in the neighbourhood. First, the other guys aren’t there. They are indoors and are stuck to their own screens. Second, he and his peers’ parents are convinced that if he is outside, he’ll be kidnapped, beaten up by bullies or meet a recruiter from the North American Man Boy Love Association.

Our modern boy doesn’t get much exercise which you can tell from his rounded shoulders and the baby fat which he should have been shed years earlier. But how could he. He is driven or bussed to school for safety reasons. When he gets exercise it is part of an adult-saturated, over-organised sports world where physical contact between boys is only allowed when they are covered head-to-toe with enough protective gear to make movement barely possible. Arguments about whether a referee [yes, of course, they have to have referees] made the correct call is strictly verboten. A scuffle with another player could get him banned from the league and his anxious parents in the grandstands would be forced to live in infamy.

Other than manipulate the "on" and "off" switches, the volume controls and a few other knobs, modern boy doesn’t know how to do much. He has never had to do much and the men in his life have conveniently disappeared or are too busy with their work or their own pleasures that they have never taught him to do anything. He doesn’t know how to wash a car, saw wood, hammer a nail, trim a hedge, weed a garden [let alone raise a vegetable garden], bait a rat trap, or repair a punctured bike tire. Maybe with sufficient nagging, he can make his bed [sort of], take the dishes out of the dishwasher and put out the garbage, chores that in another day would have been the province of his sister.

Then there is school. In recent decades, no part of society has become more feminised, more boy-unfriendly. First of all, for young boys to sit quietly in desk seats for six or seven hours a day has long been contrary to the laws of nature. However, in the past, children walked to school in the morning, walked or run home for lunch and did the same at 3:00, only to get their ball and glove and work off the pent-up energy from the school day.

Second, there are fewer and fewer male teachers. The principalship, once the province of men, is now more and more the province of the fairer sex. Those male teachers that are left live in fear of intimacy or even putting a hand on a boy’s shoulder, lest they become a tort lawyer’s meal ticket.

Third, the academic ante has been raised in our schools. The stakes are higher and there is more and more pressure to get the children ready to compete in the global economy. That can be translated into students becoming more and more skilled at the manipulation of symbols, tasks at which our boys are not genetically endowed and, thus, are falling behind.

Most educators are scratching their heads at what is now called the "crisis of boys." On the other hand, girls are doing well. They outshine boys in all aspects of the symbol-driven world we live in. They get better grades and have higher aspirations. Girls outnumber boys in Advance Placement programs, in most math and science courses and in all extracurricular activities except sports. In 2006, girls represented 58 per cent of the student bodies at US colleges and universities.

It is little wonder that junior is in a funk. He is not living according to his nature, and while he may not know it, he can feel it. Somehow we have changed the way we live and while there appear to be many benefits, the way we are living is having disastrous effects on our boys. Given all the other crises facing the world, getting excited and making serous changes in how we raise our boys may not vault to the top of our collective priority list. But think about it. A nation without men, with only pleasure-saturated, spineless screen-watchers is a truly frightening prospect.

Kevin Ryan founded the Center for the Advancement of Ethics and Character at Boston University, where he is professor emeritus. He has written and edited 20 books. He has appeared recently on CBS's "This Morning", ABC's "Good Morning America", "The O’Reilly Factor", CNN and the Public Broadcasting System speaking on character education. He can be reached at .

Comments (24)

Ottawa Male said...

Good article, glad others are seeing these same trends, tho there seems to be little hope nonetheless.

-- | Saturday, 4 August 2007 at 10:30 pm

Sean Ollech said...

“That can be translated into students becoming more and more skilled at the manipulation of symbols, tasks at which our boys are not genetically endowed and, thus, are falling behind.”

I would have to disagree with that statement. The way in which school is designed now, is catered to discourage the young men. First of all, they are NOT being taught about the great men in history. If you were to flip through the books, they are not given any ‘role models’ as to how they ought to live their life, whereas girls are given every one. History is taught to list the impressive deeds of women throughout history at the expense of men. It would be interesting to ask these boys how many presidents they know of compared with the ‘important women’ who take up the time in class.

As a result, they come to associate performance in school with ‘feminine ideals’. Men can excel in all aspects, they have been the vast majority in university up until the very recent age, and even now, they are the majority of those engaged in engineering, the harder sciences. If you look at most degrees these days, they are in teaching and nursing, or one of the ‘soft’ disciplines like sociology, and women’s studies.

Out of a class of 400, perhaps 100 will be in arts (about 70-80 percent female), another 100 will be in biology or nursing (again about 70-80 female), another 100 will be in sociology and the remaining 100 is in computer sciences, math, physics, chemistry. There were three men who graduated in Physics, out of a class of 400. Less then one percent.

Canada | Sunday, 5 August 2007 at 4:00 am

Lisa Weislogel said...

What a refreshing, wonderful article.  This is the way boyhood was meant to be.

United States | Sunday, 5 August 2007 at 8:46 am

Jean Fallace said...

Dear Mr. Ryan,

Thank you for a very good article.  I hope that you will be able to publish this article in a good Catholic magazine called “New Oxford Review.” You certainly it the nail on the head with all of your observations.

I hope that you will have continued success in promoting these ideas to parents, and that they will be inspired by your article to bring their children back to the basics, as God wishes us to be.

I wish you God’s blessings!

United States | Sunday, 5 August 2007 at 11:25 am

Jean Fallace said...

Dear Mr. Ryan,

I don’t know what happenend to my previous email regarding your article--so here goes again.

Thank you for a very informative article.  I hope that you will be able to publish this article in a very good Catholic magazine called “New Oxford Review.”

I hope that you will get much exposure with your ideas in this article, and that parents will be inspired to go back to the basics with their children as God intended.

God’s blessings!

-- | Sunday, 5 August 2007 at 11:31 am

G.H said...

True, it’s about time that boys started acted more like boys, being a woman I’d like to see a whole lot more masculinity in the malesheard11

Australia | Sunday, 5 August 2007 at 12:24 pm

Wil said...

Let boys be boys. Our feminized society is turning us all into soft Politically Correct spineless wimps.

United States | Sunday, 5 August 2007 at 12:26 pm

Chris said...

Excellent piece! My eleven year old also loves The Dangerous Book for Boys. I highly recommend it.

United States | Sunday, 5 August 2007 at 1:52 pm

Bob De brey said...

Yes, I see it in my grandchildren. Corrective moves are needed now. Actually, some of the same observations apply to girls, which is also counter to life as we have appreciated it.

United States | Monday, 6 August 2007 at 1:02 am

Frank Jones said...

In the early 70’s I taught at a boys school that thought as you do. The school was criticized for having the boys go canoeing for extended periods and to learn to walk on snowshoes.  The school’s chores were done by the boys and in so doing they helped to keep the cost of running the place down. We had a meat program where we produced hams, bacon.sausage,and chickens all done ,under supervision and in concert, with a teacher.  The product was sold,by the boys, in a nearby city, and the profits used to fund the school.  There was a recognition by the school that the students were far more capable than society gave them credit for.  I saw boys have many small successes that added up to a self confidence that was marvelous to behold. The best example of this confidence was when I saw a group of grade 11 boys reading the poetry that they had written to each other with no signs of embarrassment just self- confidence.

Canada | Tuesday, 7 August 2007 at 7:50 am

kevin ryan said...

Dear Jean:  This is the first time I’ve responded to a comment...and I’m not sure if I’m doing it correctly, so I’d appreciate you responding if you get this.

And thanks so much for your encouragement.

Kevin

United States | Tuesday, 7 August 2007 at 11:20 pm

Crimson Wife said...

I agree with Bob de Bray’s comment that the same issue exists with girls too. *All* children could use more opportunities for child-directed play outside and more “hands-on” learning activities rather than drill-and-kill worksheets. An involved father is good for daughters as well as sons, though the latter are more at risk for problems when it’s lacking. Girls may be better at coping with today’s unhealthy environments than boys, but that doesn’t mean it’s good for them either.

The gender gap in college degrees is a bit misleading since many male-dominated trades actually pay good money but do not require college. Occupations such as plumber, electrician, high-end auto mechanic, HVAC technician, etc. In my area, a skilled one can make six figures and he doesn’t have to worry about his job being outsourced to India or China.

United States | Wednesday, 8 August 2007 at 4:03 am

Liz Goodwin said...

I agree that there has been a steadly demasculinization of our culture, largely, I think, due to the overwhelming “feminine power” hype.  A recent graduate of UCLA, there were times when I even felt intimated by those of my own sex. 

Males seeking acceptance from females have a hard time acheiving that acceptance without being boring and fat and doing lots of “indoorsy” activities. 

Of course there are the males who are just plain lazy, but I’m speaking in generalities that they can be hurt be the harshness of the fair sex, when woman condemn men for acting the way they do.

United States | Wednesday, 8 August 2007 at 6:55 am

Father of Boys said...

I am terribly troubled about the amount of time boys spend in front of electronic screens.  My own boys seem to have adapted well to fairly restrictive TV and computer usage rules.  No computer or TV-based games are permitted in the house.  So what do they do?  They each play at least two musical instruments. They do sports - baseball, soccer, and ultimate frisbee.  They love to go fishing and bicycling.

I concur with Jean Fallace that this article should gain wider publication in Catholic periodicals.  Parochial school administrators should pay particular attention.  Our parochial school is good on the whole, but tends to treat boys like defective girls. They won’t sit still and insist on climbing the trees.  We moved them to an all-boys school.

Sounds like I need to find a copy of The Dangerous Book for Boys.

United States | Wednesday, 8 August 2007 at 9:35 am

Jean Fallace said...

JMJ

Dear Kevin,

As you requested in your comment, you wanted to know if I had seen it, and I did today.

This past Sunday, one of my sons-in-law and I were talking about the games and activities that he and the children of his generation played when they were young. He was very bothered about the inactivity of children these days. I was happy to tell him about your article and how it was just what he was talking about.  See, we never know who we may influence, and hopefully, we will be good Christian examples.

By the way, I have been blessed with six grandsons and fourteen granddaughters, and God willing many more. I am going to look into buying The Dangerous Book for Boys for my grandsons. 

Take care, and again may your article reach many more parents.

God’s Blessings,

Jean

United States | Wednesday, 8 August 2007 at 1:14 pm

Page 1 of 2 :  1 2 >

New comment

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:
0/2000
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?
Type the characters you see in the image below:

free updates

Email