Michelle Martin | Tuesday, 16 September 2008

Girl power? Who are they kidding?

Ella Fitzgerald could teach the gyrating girl bands a thing or two about power.

Wow. Blink and you'd have missed that lonely little star in the corner of my local paper's compact disc reviews -- the rating merited by the musical endeavours of Girlicious, released in August. I suppose the one star belongs to the producer, also known as the guy who works the voice filter machine. My first taste of that group came when I was away from home and flipping through the cable television channels, reminding myself why we don't buy cable in our house.

The Girlicious show was one of those elimination reality shows where the contestants were competing for spots in a new all-girl group. As I recall, the show was a spin-off of another girl group called the Pussycat Dolls (who were former exotic dancers, I understand). They were dressed like the Bratz dolls you can buy for your daughter in any toy department. Now I'm trying not to go all conspiracy-theory here, but in the three minutes of Girlicious that I saw, it was evident that they, also, were being marketed to youngsters.

As part of the competition, they were trotted out (yes, like so much horseflesh) to some mall or neighbourhood event, where they strutted (and gyrated, wiggled and thrust) their stuff in front of an audience full of squealing little girls. It was enough to make me (before I gave my head a shake) long for the relative innocence and slightly more complicated vocals of the Spice Girls. My mind wandered back to the simpler days of my own youth, when the look-alike models on Robert Palmer's 1980's videos danced in unison behind him with blank expressions on their faces as he sang "Simply Irresistible"; their skin-tight dresses actually covered the whole torso. How quaint.

We've read columnist after columnist over the years bemoan the sexualization of young girls and the dumbing down of necklines in the clothing that is marketed to them. We watch periodic current affairs shows expose the dubious advertising techniques that sell these attitudes. But it continues, and gets worse. Where is the outcry?

Young Ella Fitzgerald. Photo: Wikipedia / Carl Van HechtenA society that encourages young women to see their worth in their bodies and not their minds and hearts is simply the flip side of one that insists they must be covered completely from head to foot. Think about it. Our pop culture treats women like eye candy, the more uncovered the better. The Taliban treats women like dangerous candy that you can't even look in the eye-- they must be so completely covered as to be unidentifiable. As E. M. Forster wrote, "Only connect..."

Where the Taliban outlaws education for girls as unnecessary, a show like Girlicious tells them they don't need to use their brains or develop real personalities, they just need to be hot. I've been listening to a lot of genuine musical genius these days, because my seventeen year-old daughter's latest (legal, of course) downloading fad is Ella Fitzgerald. It could make you weep for joy: pure, pitch-perfect, improvisational, engaging song; live concerts without voice filters, lip-synching or pre-recorded multi-track vocals.

Would she be as big a star as she was in her day if she were just starting out now? She was pretty, but not drop-dead gorgeous by today's standards, and her figure was not model-thin. When she got older, she looked her age. She was quietly generous to organizations that supported troubled youth, and adopted a child without any media fanfare. With her audience, she was unfailingly sincere. She herself said, "I know I'm no glamour girl, and it's not easy for me to get up in front of a crowd of people. It used to bother me a lot, but now I've got it figured out that God gave me this talent to use, so I just stand there and sing."

Now that's girl power.

Michelle Martin writes from Hamilton, Ontario.

Comments to Girl power? Who are they kidding? have been disabled. Thank you for your contribution.
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
verderocks said... -- | Thu, 25 Sep 2008 at 8:31 pm

I think we have gone way over the top with these girl bands. Today it is all about the looks, the glamour and the sex and it sells. Gone are the voices from a Fitzgerald and gone are the modesty in which these girl groups dress.



Michelle Martin said... -- | Sat, 20 Sep 2008 at 11:46 am

Thought readers might be interested in this small victory here in Canada and the US-- the removal of Bratz doll books from the Scholastic book order forms that come home from school, after some parent pressure:

http://www.nationalpost.com/arts/story.html?id=798028



David Page said... United States | Sat, 20 Sep 2008 at 12:10 am

Some years ago, after Kalvin Klein aired their disgusting Kiddie-porn and heroin chique ads, I asked my family never to buy anything with a Calvin Klein logo on it again. They agreed. The home is were these things are taught. Society can’t raise your kids for you. When the home changes, society changes. Too many people live their lives vicariously through their children. And let’s not forget that boys have to be taught to treat girls respectfully also.



Kathleen Chabot said... Canada | Thu, 18 Sep 2008 at 12:32 pm

You are so right on! I plan on sending this to my older son, who has 13-year-old and 11½ year-old daughters.



charles nixon said... Canada | Thu, 18 Sep 2008 at 10:58 am

Two things enter [and leave my mind] : June Christie’s: Something Cool .  . [theme music for DJ Ron Roberts’ show on CJCH radio - Halifax - ca. 1960] .  .  . then Philip Wylie’s The Generation of Vipers ca. 1940 something - on modern advertising - in this case modern teevee of the Girlicious variety .  . .
Mr. Wylie wrote that the whole business could be summed-up with the question, Madam [?] , are you a good lay?
Of WHAT are they thinking, eh?

Charles+



Ella Talk said... United States | Thu, 18 Sep 2008 at 10:37 am

“Girl power” is also being misnamed since it’s only used to denigrate and whine about life’s bad choices they make, by being promiscuous. Most girl problems arise from them using their bodies to please, keep, attract, boys.

Their songs are so vindictive and flashback combative minded, the younger fans they attract continue the cycle of sleazy, vain and “he hurt me” kind of songs/lyrics. There wouldn’t be bad boys if there were responsible parents and girls, in upbringing them

When girl power relates to teaching little girls/fans to wait for marriage before sex, and God, race and family honor comes before their personal wants, their lives and our societies will be better off.



Michelle Martin said... -- | Thu, 18 Sep 2008 at 9:52 am

Raymond Barry: My daughter says thanks for the list!



Raymond Barry said... Canada | Thu, 18 Sep 2008 at 2:15 am

I love those singers from that era. Others your daughter might like are June Christy, Helen Merrill (If you want to hear sexy, listen to her version of “Anything Goes"), Helen Humes, Sarah Vaughan, and so many others. Ella herself came up the hard way. Raised in an orphanage, she went to work with the Chick Webb band. Chick was one of the great drummers of all time and he was a hunchback. When he died of TB, Ella took over the band. I think she was about 18 at the time.
That was the time when the Great American Songbook was being written. If your daughter is really daring she should check out a few opera singers, including my current favourite who is one of today’s great beauties: Anna Netrebko. Beautiful voice, beautiful phrasing, musical, she has it all and she just knocks me out.



Donna said... United States | Wed, 17 Sep 2008 at 3:16 am

Ah, but Ella Fitzgerald didn’t have ‘girl power’. She had ‘woman power’, - an entirely different thing.


Page 1 of 1 :