Mary Cooney | Tuesday, 26 August 2008

Homeschooling: a learning experience for the whole family

It was a lot harder than I imagined, but the reasons for educating our children at home were compelling.

Just recently, the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District reversed its earlier ruling to make homeschooling in California illegal unless the parents had teacher certification. This ruling, which would have affected over 166,000 homeschoolers, ignited a huge outcry from people across the nation. So strong was the support for homeschoolers, that in the Court of Appeal, the three judges voted unanimously in favor of reversing the former ruling.

This incident sheds light on the fact that homeschoolers in the United States are now a force to be reckoned with. And their numbers are growing. According to a survey made by the US Department of Education, there were 850,000 homeschoolers in 1999. By 2003, the numbers had grown by 29 per cent to 1.1 million. In 2006, according to the National Home Education Research Institute (NHERI), there were between 2.0 to 2.5 million children being educated at home. “Homeschooling,” writes the institute’s Dr Brian Ray, “is now bordering on ‘mainstream’ in the United States. It may be the fastest growing form of education in the United States.”

Why are so many parents choosing to educate their children at home? This is a question I asked as my husband and I began home educating our daughter. According to the same survey, put out by the US Department of Education, 31 per cent of parents chose to home school because of their concerns with the school environment, such as negative peer pressure and drugs. And 30 per cent of parents did so in order to give religious and moral instruction. Indeed, these would be our primary reasons for choosing this path.

Whether we are homeschooling or not, we have to make a very conscious effort to ensure that we are indeed the primary educators of our children.

But just as compelling are the testimonies of many homeschoolers about their children’s higher standardized test scores, a safe home environment, a flexible family schedule, reading books together as a family, and vacationing in October.

And so it was with great anticipation that I began homeschooling my daughter last year. Having been a piano teacher and a high school teacher, I assumed that teaching one little five-year-old would be quite simple. Much to my surprise, it was more difficult than I could have imagined. At times it was so challenging that I found myself asking, “Now why are we doing this? And is it really worth it?”

This summer, as I prepared for another year of homeschooling, I took the time to reflect deeply upon the difficulties we had and to examine our reasons for homeschooling. Why are we homeschooling? What are the challenges, and how can we overcome them? This is what I would like to share.

Reasons for homeschooling

Do as the geniuses do. In college and graduate school I had a great admiration for homeschooling families. The parents were convinced of what they believed and the children were among the most well-behaved kids I ever knew. As a piano teacher I had the pleasure of teaching some homeschooled kids, and I found them to be very obedient and respectful, very consistent in their piano practicing and theory homework, and very hard workers. In group piano class, these children socialized very well with the other students. They were such a pleasure to teach, that I sometimes thought I would like to have a studio more or less devoted to them.

Among pianists, there is a saying: Do as the geniuses do. That is, if you want to perform like a great concert pianist, discover the way they practice and imitate their methods. I think this can be true of great families. I know several families that I would like to use as a model for our own, and it so happens that the majority are homeschoolers. I see the joy, the great relationships the kids have with their parents, the strong religious foundation, the innocence of the children, and I want to discover and imitate their methods. I think: Do as these geniuses are doing.

We are the primary educators of our children. As parents, we have the right and duty to be the primary educators of our children. This is a major part of living out our vocation as parents. However, at this point in time it is tremendously difficult:

The media and our culture in general are constantly undermining the authority of the parent. For example, in many states, teenage girls are given contraceptives or abortions without parental notice. Even for the youngest children there are many movies, TV shows and books where the dad is dumb and the kids outsmart their parents.

There is an over-emphasis on the importance of peers. Too often, parents allow a child’s peers to have far too much influence.

Television and the internet clamor for our children’s attention and seduce them with their glamour and empty promises of material happiness.

Long hours at school and a multitude of after-school activities can easily result in little time spent with the parents and siblings.

Whether we are homeschooling or not, we have to make a very conscious and heroic effort to ensure that we are indeed the primary educators of our children. Homeschooling parents have a little more control over what influences their children.

Religious education of children. We must also raise our children to know and understand their faith. However, the media and other sectors of society promote agendas that are diametrically opposed to our beliefs. We as parents are trying to encourage self control, restraint in spending and generosity with the poor, respect for the sanctity of life and for the dignity of human beings made in the image of God, and an understanding that truth is objective. But the media flatly contradict us with their own messages: indulge yourself; you can’t be happy unless you buy, buy, buy; all things are disposable, including people -- after you have finished using them; truth is relative -- “that’s only your belief”.

Homeschooling is a way we can ensure that we are the primary educators of our children and that we take full responsibility for our children’s formation and religious upbringing.

Finding and being able to afford the ideal school. We would consider sending our children to school if we could find and afford a school that served as an extension of our home. Such a school would not only have to provide religious and moral teaching in accord with the Catholic faith. All the faculty and staff should be excellent examples for our children of what it is to be a faithful Christian, and most of the families in the school should uphold church teaching. Our ideal school would have high academic standards, be in comfortable proximity to the home, be single-sex and have small class sizes.

In our area there are a few schools that may meet most of our criteria. However, these schools are also expensive – almost unaffordable, especially considering that we are hoping to be blessed with more children while remaining a family of single income. We also believe it is financially wiser to educate our children at home while they are young and to save the money otherwise spent on elementary school for an outstanding high school and college education.

The socialization issue. The definition of “socialization” in the American Heritage Dictionary is: 1. to place under government or group ownership or control; 2. to fit for companionship with others, make sociable. The first definition made me smile. It seems to me that the liberal minded media as well as those groups that target the young with their feminist/homosexual agendas would very much like children to be socialized and placed under their ownership and control. On this definition, therefore, we do not care to socialize our children. We want our children to be in control of themselves, of their passions and desires. In this way, they will have the freedom and ability to discern and do what is right. In this way they will find fulfillment and happiness.

Of course, when most people talk about the socialization of children they are referring to the second definition. It is only natural that parents are concerned about their children “fitting in” at school. It is so painful to watch a child suffer cruelty from other kids because he is “too different” in one way or another.

However, if my husband and I succeed in preserving our children’s innocence and prevent them from becoming materialistic they will, by necessity, be very different from many of their peers. For example, our children do not watch television. They do not have a superabundance of toys. They do not wear immodest clothing. They will not have lavish birthday parties. Carolyn will never own a Bratz doll. They are more familiar with classical music than rock music. They know more about real-life heroes than they do of movie stars. And we hope that Hannah Montana will simply remain a face on a t-shirt they don’t own. In coming years, their freedom in using the internet will be in proportion to their level of maturity and responsibility.

Our children are still very young, but as they get older the differences between them and most other children will be more apparent. In a school setting (particularly public school) they would probably cause our children to be excluded by others and give them reason for feeling discontent with what they have, what they wear, and what they are and are not allowed to do. And yet we do not want to compromise our moral standards.

On the other hand, our local Catholic home school group is full of families that share our beliefs, morals and values. In this group, the children find friends with whom they have much in common and meet older kids who are good role models. In fact, it may be that the best way to “socialize” our children is to surround them with love, first in the home and then in warm, caring environments outside the home.

Protecting our children and making them strong. We want to protect our children -- especially when they are so young, impressionable and vulnerable -- not only from the pain of being “too different”, but also from the negative influence of people (peers included!) who have bad attitudes, who are materialistic, who are immodest. We especially want to protect them from those people whose beliefs are contrary to ours and who seek to impose their agendas on our children.

As they grow physically, we hope and pray they will also grow to be strong emotionally and spiritually. A mother bird protects and nourishes her chicks in the nest until they are strong, before sending them out to fly. By homeschooling, are we being over-protective? Not if we are striving to make our children strong so they can go out into the world, hold their own in it and influence it for good.

Our other reasons for homeschooling include the following: each child’s learning style and pace can be identified, respected, and used; homeschooling gives us more time spent together as a family (the kids are growing so fast! We want to savor these moments); we also have more flexibility in our schedule; the children have more “free time” for playing, reading, using their imaginations.

And now, the challenges

A great balancing act. Homeschooling is a lot of work, especially when you’re new at it (and unsure of what you’re doing). You have to balance chores, cooking, running errands, and paying the bills with the kids’ social activities and, of course, school lessons. You have to balance spending quality time with each child. You have to balance your busy day with time spent nourishing your spiritual life and time spent just with your spouse.

Balancing all of this can be stressful! And when I’m stressed, I find it hard to be patient and charitable. When I’m not patient and charitable, I feel like a mean mommy and a terrible teacher. Then, the kids don’t learn well. Then I get frustrated and discouraged. Then the kids are frustrated and discouraged. This makes homeschooling a learning and character-building experience for me as well.

Motivating your children. Many children do things for other adults more eagerly and docilely than they do for their parents, particularly their mothers. I had tremendous difficulty getting Carolyn to submerge her head under the water, but her swim teacher got her to do it at her first request. I know many wonderful piano teachers who refuse to teach their own children. After teaching Carolyn piano for a year, I know why! This fact of human nature, that children often put on better behavior for other adults, is maddening and a great challenge for homeschooling moms. However, it forces us to seek ways of understanding and motivating our children and this is a very important lesson for all parents.

Being objective about your children’s abilities. My father-in-law used to work in school admissions and he tells how, when a child was entering kindergarten, parents used to come into his office and say, “I know I’m his parent, but really and truly, this kid is gifted.” By fifth grade, the same parents would come to him and say, “I don’t know what’s the matter. He keeps on getting C’s.”

Mothers, I think, are prone to being too demanding or too soft. We have a tendency to expect too much of our oldest child and this can frustrate us when he or she does not meet our expectations. On the other hand, with the younger children we may easily come up with a myriad of excuses for under-achievement.

The group dynamic. There’s no denying it. There can be a wonderful positive energy that is generated when a group of children are together. Throw in a little healthy competition and you can have a great environment for learning. It is also very motivating; I’ve seen it a lot of times when teaching group piano. Unless you have a large family you may have to think up creative ways of capturing the benefits of a group dynamic. No wonder home school co-ops are so popular.

Who needs to be disciplined? Mom must be very, very disciplined. Some days I would much rather go shopping than teach math. Some days I want to sleep in and start the day late. And since I have no boss to penalize me for doing so, it is very easy to take the day off.

Sometimes I see or hear about a new and wonderful curriculum. And immediately, I want to incorporate it into my lesson plans. But soon after, I find out about another new and exciting way of teaching math or reading and I want to use that method.

It takes a lot of discipline to follow through with your schedule and your pre-determined course of study. At the same time, it takes wisdom and discernment to know when to change one’s schedule, approach or materials. But I have found that when I follow my schedule, the day goes more smoothly, and I am more serene, and consequently more patient and kind with my children.

Babies and toddlers. My friend Sue has it perfect. She home schools Audrey while Max takes his lovely two-hour nap in the afternoon. Audrey gets all her homeschooling done in 1.5 hours. What a breeze. I can’t wait till her baby is born and she starts homeschooling “on the fly”!

For us, homeschooling has not been such a walk in the park. Last year it was a real challenge keeping a fussy baby and an active toddler happy while trying to give Carolyn her lessons. There were constant interruptions: Thomas had to be nursed, Peter had to use the potty, it was Thomas’ nap time but he didn’t want to take a nap, Peter was thirsty and wanted a drink, Carolyn was thirsty and wanted a drink, Thomas pooped in his diaper... This year, I hope, it will be easier as the kids are a little older and we are finding new ways of keeping everyone relatively occupied and happy. A good sense of humor goes a long way.

Family and friends who don’t understand. As stated earlier, homeschooling is a fast-growing trend in the United States. Numbers are growing and many businesses that cater to children make special offers and programs for homeschoolers. When you tell people that you are homeschooling your children, they no longer look at you as if you had two heads.

Still, almost all of my homeschooling friends have family members and friends that do not understand and do not support their decision to home school. My husband and I have been very blessed to have supportive families, but for those who don’t, this can be a real source of contention or sensitivity. In such a case, homeschooling parents need to remember that their job is to educate their children in the manner they think is best, not to win the approval of others. Also, we can find tremendous support from other homeschoolers and we can persevere with the hope that our efforts will bear much fruit in the future. After all, the most rewarding endeavours are those that are the most challenging

A final thought…

I once heard a beautiful analogy about large families that I think can apply to all families, homeschooling or not. A family is like the fire in the hearth of a home. For those on the outside of the home looking in, the shining fire is warm and inviting. For those in the home, this fire gives light and warmth. It is vital for the comfort of those living in the home. But upon closer inspection, one sees the sparks flying, the wood crackling, and the messy ashes. It is not a pretty sight.

Our families are like that fire in the hearth. We have our difficulties and our moments of discouragement, stress and frustration. Tempers flare up, sparks fly, the house is, at times, a real mess. But despite this, our love for each other gives light and warmth and joy to those around us.

Mary Cooney writes from Baltimore, Maryland.

Comments to Homeschooling: a learning experience for the whole family have been disabled. Thank you for your contribution.
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
João Pedro Afonso said... -- | Fri, 5 Sep 2008 at 6:01 am

Krista, this is the first time ever, I encounter the concept of homeschooling as a modern movement. What you’ll read from me is the thoughts of a person facing for the first time a new concept and trying to analyze it from every angle.
I’m sure my thoughts are going to evolve with time and information, but it is not a good sign if you confound them already with “misinformation” spread by governments and others… are you sure it is that, if persons like me arrive independently to the same positions alike? Anyway, I usually justify my arguments, so, it shouldn’t be difficult to see where I’m wrong.

What surprises me most when I first read this idea as a modern growing trend, it was the fact that it is the oldest form of teaching on the book. It is what we did for thousand years. We still do, in the matters that count most, like teaching language and good manners. But if homeschoolling per se was that good, then there wouldn’t be any trouble with poor countries and educational systems where it would be the norm. The fact is, if we want to raise a country from the zero, the first thing to do is to build a good network of primary and secondary schools, to educate and wait the maturation. Modern homeschooling works now because we have parents well educated, with free time, plenty of information and books, and I guess the countries which allow it, has in place facilities to test regularly homeschoolers like they test the others. But I know by experience that there are things which teaching only comes with teaching experience, and others which only came with what Mary called group dynamic. Mary coined her article as a learning experience for the family, which means not only the children are students, the parents too, in the role of becoming professors… but imagine they were that since the beginning?

Although I might say, the “vacationing in October” argument is very tempting ;-)

(but I agree with you in the self-worth matter)


krista said... Canada | Thu, 4 Sep 2008 at 11:24 am

Joao Pedro,
You have so many ideas, thoughts and assumptions regarding homeschooling. Simplify your concerns and you will see clear through the fog of misinformation that is spread by governments, non homeschoolers, education boards and so on. If you love your children, you try to give them the best. There is nothing better than your time- and that is what homeschooling is. Whether the kids are A+ or C- , they have a sense of self worth because you care about them. They have the knowledge that if no one else is happy with them they need not despair because you care. As parents, we teach our children how to feed themselves, how to say thank you and how to share. What we model for our kids ( patience, effort, ambition etc.)is what they learn and will shape them as they become adults. I think it is very unlikely that the misinformed people regarding homeschooling have considered the simplicity of why homeschooling is a growing movement that will better our countries.


João Pedro Afonso said... -- | Wed, 3 Sep 2008 at 8:38 pm

Thanks, Mary, for your link. I read it carefully and I’m impressed with the results. I don’t think they can be extrapolated easily for the current times: If homeschooling is experimenting an explosive grow in the United States, then the homeschoolers of ten or twenty years ago were the few pioneers of the pioneers, from whom I would expected more. Then again, they could also be the most extremists and adverse to society, from whom I would expect less. It’s going to be interesting to see what will happen with homeschooling expansion, with more and more families of all kinds and competences pouring into the system. The numbers will be likely worst but even so, probably higher than normal schools numbers (A likely desinvestment in public schools if homeschooling turns too much mainstream, will not help either).

At least, it served to show me I was wrong in at least one of my reasonings. Kids being kids, will always take all the chances they can get to stay out of home and socialize, if forced to be there too much time. Without school to fulfill that role, they will look for other places. The percentage of home school’s civic participation was a good surprise.

I still think there is a cost to pay, not in the ones who “suffer” homeschooling, but in the ones in the normal school who’ll lose the opportunity of being influenced by them, a cost which will translate in a more fractured society. But perhaps I’m expecting too much. From this side of the Atlantic, American school has already reputation of stress competitiveness and individualism, and in this context, my idea or reasoning might not have sense at all.


patricia.m.hope@gmail.com said... United Kingdom | Tue, 2 Sep 2008 at 10:09 pm

This the best article I have read on this subject. Thank you Mary.
I love your analogy of home with a fire! Very true.


mary cooney said... United States | Tue, 2 Sep 2008 at 1:21 pm

Thank you everyone for your responses!
Joao Pedro Afonso wanted to know about grownups who have experienced homeschooling themselves.  You may want to look at this study:
http://www.nheri.org/Home-Educated-and-Now-Adults.html


Roland Emond said... -- | Tue, 2 Sep 2008 at 12:38 am

We began home educating or children in 1983; and our youngest of four is 17 and beginning her last year of high school.  It hasn’t been easy, but it has been rewarding.  As parents we have learned much about ourselves and our children.  At the same time we pulled the plug on TV.  Between the two we have become a close family.


João Pedro Afonso said... -- | Mon, 1 Sep 2008 at 10:25 pm

...(7/7)
Disagreement with the curricula has been a motive too. According to some, schools doesn’t teach religion or morals enough. Curiously, the correct answer to that is the thing criticized. Good public schools should strive to be political correct and not offend willing anyone valid. They should do that not in order to create a “new” homogeneous citizen but because by teaching only what everyone accept, they allow the parents to teach the rest. Repeating Mary words, parents should always be the primary educators. In this motive is also hiding the fear that the parent’s teachings may be contaminated or corrupted by the school teachings… to answer that, forgive my blunt cruelty: if a teaching is susceptible to corruption, then it is not worth it. If the school environment is hostile to some of our convictions, then it should be welcome as an opportunity to sharp and reinforce them…

I’m sorry for the extension of this comment. I’m new to the theme of homeschooling, and I might have exceed myself out of ignorance. I’ll leave with a piece I read this weekend in a newspaper. In Lindau, there is a periodic reunion between Nobel prizes and young scientists, a way to stimulate the last ones. It’s very mediatic, full of stars, but this year they counted with one more little star too: Nicholas, the son of Robert Mundell who with 10 years is able to discuss Father’s theories. When asked by the press why he doesn’t agree with the creation of special schools for gifted children like him, the young Nicholas answered “that way, how could I helped my colleagues who have more difficulties to learn?”


João Pedro Afonso said... Portugal | Mon, 1 Sep 2008 at 10:19 pm

...(6/7)
This inscribes itself in a more general trend I criticize. Commercial interests has been promoting private condominiums, private schools, private and restricted “otherthings” as answer to safety concerns. But by retiring people actions from the public space, they are weakening it. A public park near my home gained reputation of being insecure over the years… people didn’t like to walk there during certain hours. Better illumination combined with a fad for walking (and the always need to be present dog owners) brought presences to the park again and dispel those fears. The key to safety is public occupation, not redrawing to home and leaving the streets to the bad wolves.

The same can be said about homeschooling. No wonder some countries will see that as bad citizenship. The 2 million and half homeschoolers number, a very sizable fraction of the US scholar population, means 2 million and half potential leaders not exerting their good influence over their mates, to raise some and be raise by them. I’m classifying them as leaders because they would came from good families extremely concerned with their education, so it is only natural to expect that (but, alas, forget it, if homeschooling doesn’t teach them the social skills to it).

I’m not blind to the fact there are hopeless schools; or situations which requires really homeschooling. The problem is how to draw the separation line. If a school turns bad because the good student population has left, it’s foolish to advise their return since individual decisions of return will only sacrifice those to the situation. My censorship is only for those who started the quitting trend.
...


João Pedro Afonso said... Portugal | Mon, 1 Sep 2008 at 10:16 pm

...(5/7)
My fourth and last critic differs substantially from the others in the fact that it is not technical but political. Until now, everything I said can be solved without putting homeschooling at risk, but this one concerns the concept itself. I said a lot of stuff about what a school is, how is a place to learn content and to socialize, and also as a watching point for the sake of the children. Recalling those times, my best friendships were born there, most of my friends, my dreams, I saw long-life partnerships and couples created there, I saw… there was also fights, people trying to reassert themselves and growing up, political experiences, ties made up…

What I’m saying is, while a common fear expressed here is the possibility of bad companies ("drugs and sex") in the normal schools, the opposite is also true, there is good companies to win too. And they are or should be the norm, not the exception. Except, whenever a good parent takes out his children from school, he is retiring one possible good influence from the student’s pool, raising the bad influence ratio and the chances of the “bad” guys to “win”. By acting on fear, they are promoting the very reasons of that fear.
...


João Pedro Afonso said... Portugal | Mon, 1 Sep 2008 at 10:14 pm

...(4/7)
This is typical of the problems homeschooling brings for the state, not so much as a negative thing “per se” but by the loss of tools to exert its functions. The modern states of today conveys rights to children independent and even superseding those conceded to the parents, meaning, they cannot do everything they want with their children,… which also means the state are liable in the future to be persecuted for failing to protect those some rights. Behind the respectable cape of homeschooling, we may have easily child abuse, child labor ("the family business"), mis-education, “bad” indoctrination,… They are not exclusive of homeschooling families but more difficult to detect on them. There is more. Take the children right to education for example. The excuse given in the Gorber case was that the mother was sick in the hospital and could not provide for the education (I presume). If in a public school, a teacher cannot lesson, it is substituted, and apparently that was what the German state did. The Gorber case isn’t pretty. From what I read, I suspect they moved out of the conviction the children were being maltreated to discover they weren’t, which is why they have such a bad PR case in hands now. Do not forget however that Europe has being witness lately to several gruesome cases like the Fritzl case and others. Suspicion is in the order of the day, and out-of-the-order families are easier victims to that.

Actually, this illustrates one possible big risk in homeschooling: if it is interrupted for any reason, it is very alike that the children will suffer more than in a normal situation. It is already hard to cope with a substitute teacher, to gain confidence on him, imagine then what would happen if the one he substitutes is the father or the mother, the first and only teacher the child knew? Imagine also if the solution must be the inscription in a normal school, a complete new and alien experience?…
...


João Pedro Afonso said... Portugal | Mon, 1 Sep 2008 at 10:11 pm

...(3/7)
My third critical comment is about state liability. I’ll start with the starting piece of Mary article. Reading it, it appears there was some judges who tried to weaken the right to homeschooling, but over public outcry, were forced to retreat their actions. That’s it, intrusion in the family sphere rights. Mary didn’t write much more about it but she presented a link I followed and… it appears there was 2 abused children under the cover of homeschooling, the reason why the judges of the case felt the need to prevent similar cases, by requiring the home school teachers to have a minimum of qualifications. Later, under pressure, they decided they haven’t jurisdiction to have done that, that is was legislative matter, and retreat. Very wise. Very sad too. I don’t think this constitutes a victory for anyone since there are abused children involved. The problem isn’t solved since the modern school isn’t just a teaching place, is also the place where the state “watches” over the children, see if they are in good health, vaccinated, well nourished, if they are not abused, etc… it is already difficult to discern abuse signs in children which presents themselves everyday in the school, imagine what happens with always absent children? What is the solution? This is the problem that must have haunted those judges and for that, they have my solidarity, even if in the process they confused the rotten tree for the forest.
...


João Pedro Afonso said... Portugal | Mon, 1 Sep 2008 at 10:08 pm

...(2/7)
A second problem I want to point concerns the advantages of scale economy in schools: in exchange of a bigger number of students per teacher, they can have experienced professors specialized in the matters in study (at least that’s the theory). I don’t think there are that much parents able to surpass the total knowledge presented in a normal school. He doesn’t surprise me that homeschooling kids runs tests as well or better than normal students, since they have a teacher all for themselves (that’s why I described the scale economy as a trade-off), however, the statement is misleading. They shouldn’t be compared with average kids but with what they would have if they had taken another path. I rank Home school parents as pioneers, fathers more worried with education than the average, worried enough to invest a serious time with that and the resources to do it… in another words the perfect parents to support their children in their education. If they had put the children in normal school instead of Homeschooling, and support them after school with the same time and energy, wouldn’t have they provided even a better performance than they have now? Food for thought.
...


João Pedro Afonso said... Portugal | Mon, 1 Sep 2008 at 10:04 pm

(1/7)
Very good article, well done and structured.

The first thing which transpires from it is an unending love from a mother for their children. It’s good to read just for that.

Second, I think I can read between lines that it is not easy at all to do a proper homeschooling. It requires energy, discipline, tons of patience and time, and no few times there will be moments when the temptation to quit will be overwhelming. More reasons to stress my first point, the parenthood love.

Third, six comments doesn’t allow me to expect much, but I would have liked to see opinions from grownups who have experienced homeschooling themselves.

You see, my earlier years having a private teacher (with few students), a protective mother and be the smaller (the youngest) when I reached public school, leaved me shy and socially unskilled. My academic record is good, but that’s not enough to live in society. Sometimes I wonder if I wasn’t protected too much and in consequence, lost abilities I should have acquired. And that’s the first problem I see in Homeschooling: If I trace some of my problems to the relative social isolation I experienced in my younger days, what I lived is nowhere near what homeschoolers experiment (or NOT). Depending on the setup, they may be loosing an important opportunity to learn how to live in society, and believe me, they are not going to be grateful for that.
...


Paul Russell said... Australia | Mon, 1 Sep 2008 at 10:47 am

Great article!

We started homeschooling about ten years ago, reluctantly it must be said! Having changed schools once and finding the second choice worse than the first we knew it would not serve our children well to continue to ‘school hop’ around the city.

Three of ours have passed on to University with extremely high grade scores. They’re well socialized, they stand up for their faith, they are actively and passionately pro-life and continue to be leaders amongst their peers.

Yes, it is difficult. But it does become easier as the routines bed down and as ‘learning by osmosis’ develops as the younger siblings ape their older brothers and sisters.

Ours are a strong willed, self-aware and opinionated lot. But we’ve never experienced any of the active dissent against our wishes that bedogg so many of our friends and their children. In short, our children are not influenced at all by the fads and phases that their age cohort experience and they are able to critically evaluate the world around them and make sound decisions.

If you’re reading this and wondering - give it a go. You’ve nothing to lose and everything to gain. And again, in case you’re wondering, neither my wife nor I are school teachers and neither of us has any post school qualifications!


Caroll Solis said... Mexico | Fri, 29 Aug 2008 at 9:16 am

To whom it may concern:
Foromas is an NGO in México that promotes ideas and creative cultural solutions for social and family dilemmas. Now we are studding some family issues. I will like to contact with Mary Cooney regarding this home schooling theme. If you can facilitate an e-mail were we can contact her, we will appreciate it very much.

Than you in advance
Caroll Solis.


Page 1 of 2 :  1 2 >