MercatorNet: The dark side of American exceptionalism
We post stuff like this every day on Facebook. Like us. You won't regret it.
Don't show this to me again
Close

The dark side of American exceptionalism

Why is 1 in 18 men in the world’s richest nation on probation, on parole or in jail?
Michael Cook | 7 July 2010
comment   | print |

The prison in Lancaster, Calif., has 4,600 inmates, twice the intended number. / New York Times, March 23, 2010 

In 2008, the United States sailed past a human rights milestone. For the first time in its history, more than one in every 100 of its adult citizens was behind bars. This appalling statistic ought to be etched on every politician’s agenda. Instead, prison reform is hardly mentioned when voters voice their priorities.

Here are some of the unsettling figures. 

The US jails more people than any other country in the world – about 2.3 million, in a population of 310 million. China says that it holds 1.5 million and Russian only 890,000. The US has 5 percent of the world's population and 25 percent of the world's prison population.

Explosive growth in the number of people on probation or parole means that there are more than 7.3 million people in the US correction system -- 1 in every 31 adults. When these figures are broken down, they become even more disturbing. Only 1 in 89 women is in the correctional system, but 1 in 18 men; only 1 white in 45, but 1 in 27 Hispanics and 1 in 11 blacks.

The US is truly exceptional in its rates of incarceration. According to figures compiled by the International Center for Prison Studies at King's College London, it has 753 people in prison or jail per 100,000 of population. Russia is a distant second, with 627 prisoners for every 100,000 people. New Zealand’s figure is 199, England’s 151, Australia’s 134, Canada’s 117, German’s 88 and Japan 63. The median figure for all nations is about 125.

Why does the United States, which prides itself on being a beacon of liberty for the world’s oppressed, jail so many people? Criminologists cite a number of reasons: a history of racial discrimination, privileging of individual responsibility, sentencing laws, politicised judges, a high incidence of violent crime, the influence of a hellfire and brimstone brand of Christianity, the political sway of incorporated privatised prisons, and so on. The problem is deeply rooted in American culture.

But in recent times it has become much worse. An explosion in incarceration began in the 1970s. Between 1925 to 1975, there were only about 110 people in prison per 100,000 people. But in the 1970s, a “get tough on crime” attitude took hold. Sentences lengthened, a “three strikes, you’re out” put offenders behind bars for life and convictions for drug trafficking sky-rocketed. In 1980, there were 41,000 drug offenders in prison; today there are more than 500,000.

Back in the 19th century the US prison system was regarded as the most humane in the world. The French sociologist Alexis de Tocqueville came to the US to study its exemplary prison system. His long report was full of admiration: “The American penitentiary system must be regarded as a new victory of mind over matter in the great and constant task of man.” But now, says sociologist James Q. Whitman, “far from serving as a model for the world, contemporary America is widely viewed with horror”.

A proposal by a Democrat Senator from Virginia, James Webb, to establish a National Criminal Justice Commission is slowly making headway in Congress. Senator Webb has become a rarity amongst politicians – a champion of prison reform. He has set down an ambitious agenda: studying the causes of “this incredible increase in incarceration”, comparing the US experience with other countries, reform of prison management, and bringing down the cost of prisons.

Cost is becoming an increasing urgent issue. In the current recession, state governments are committed to prison expenditure and find that they have to trim higher education and early childhood education, which experts say helps to prevent crime. According to a report from the Pew Center on the States, between 1987 and 2007, state expenditure on higher education rose by 21 percent while expenditure on correction rose 127 per cent.

Is this a complex issue? Yes. Can it be ignored? Not in a civilised country. In Senator Webb’s words: “We have an incarceration rate in the United States, the world's greatest democracy, that is five times as high as the average incarceration rate of the rest of the world. There are only two possibilities here: either we have the most evil people on earth living in the United States; or we are doing something dramatically wrong in terms of how we approach the issue of criminal justice.”

Prison reform is clearly one of the biggest social justice issues confronting the US – and it is hardly on the radar of most voters. Black scholar Glenn Loury, of Brown University, laments that: "speaking of the country as a whole, there is no broadly based demand for reform, no sense of moral outrage, no anguished self-criticism, no public reflection in the face of this massive, collective failure".

Is part of the explanation, perhaps, that 5.3 million people who have done time in jail are officially disenfranchised – 1 in 41 adults? All but two states ban prisoner voting; 35 states prohibit people on parole from voting, and 30 prohibit people on probation from voting. Two states deny the right to vote to all persons with felony convictions, even after they have completed their sentences The upshot of this is that the expansion of the prison population over the past 30 years may even be having a significant effect upon politics. The Sentencing Project, a lobby group, estimates that 13 percent of black men are disenfranchised, a rate seven times the national average.

The erosion of human dignity which this represents is characteristic of other institutional characteristics of the American penal system. Most prominent is the death penalty, which is applied quite unequally. Of 1,217 prisoners executed since 1976, 460 of them died in Texas. But there are many others. One extraordinary feature, made possible by the internet, is the ability to view profiles of current prisoners, with photos and their criminal record. If you go to the “offender search” feature of the Florida Department of Corrections, for instance, you can search the state’s prisons by crime or even by race.

Another is the fact that many cash-strapped jails actually charge inmates for food, phones, laundry services and medical care. Even liberal Massachusetts is considering charging inmates $5 per day to subsidise the cost of their confinement. This could drive people back to crime to pay their debts.

Whitman contends that one of the roots of the problem is that American law is procedural rather than dignitarian: “substantive norms of human dignity play a piddling role in law compared to their central place in European jurisprudence. For the US, key values always turn on the idea of “due process”. The US also places a greater emphasis on punishment as a purpose of sentencing -- hence the broad acceptance of capital punishment, as well as other quirks, like inviting the families of murder victims to witness executions.

A hundred years ago, Winston Churchill, then a junior minister in charge of prisons, gave a stirring speech in the British Parliament, one which was surprisingly idealistic for such a hard-nosed political figure. He concluded that “The mood and temper of the public in regard to the treatment of crime and criminals is one of the most unfailing tests of the civilisation of any country.”

At the moment, the United States is failing the test. Perhaps the Webb Commission will help to restore sanity and human dignity to its broken prison system.

Michael Cook is editor of MercatorNet.

MORE ON THESE TOPICS | human dignity, prisons
This article is published by Michael Cook and MercatorNet.com under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

comments powered by Disqus
Follow MercatorNet
Facebook
Twitter
Newsletters
Sections and Blogs
Harambee
PopCorn
Conjugality
Careful!
Family Edge
Sheila Reports
Reading Matters
Demography Is Destiny
Bioedge
Conniptions (the editorial)
Connecting
Information
our ideals
our People
Mercator who?
partner sites
audited accounts
donate
New Media Foundation
Suite 12A, Level 2
5 George Street
North Strathfield NSW 2137
Australia

editor@mercatornet.com
+61 2 8005 8605
skype: mercatornet

© New Media Foundation 2014 | powered by Encyclomedia | designed by Elleston