Denyse O’Leary | Wednesday, 8 October 2008

The payoff for straining the brain

Does self-discipline beat intelligence? What about a good night’s sleep?

A perennial question... especially as some of us head back to school: Are we born smart? Do we achieve smarts? Does bitter experience thrust smarts upon us?

Unfortunately, some researchers into the sources of intelligence seem to be looking for something that isn’t actually there — a specific genetic inheritance, mechanism, brain wiring diagram, or excess of cells that guarantees exceptional intelligence. But life is seldom as simple as that. Not surprisingly, research results can be confusing or contradictory as a result.

In a recent edition of Scientific American Mind, Christian Hoppe and Jelena Stojanovic write, “No one is sure why some experiments indicate that a bright brain is a hardworking one, whereas others suggest it is one that can afford to relax. Some, such as Haier—who has found higher brain metabolic rates in more astute individuals in some of his studies but not in others—speculate one reason could relate to the difficulty of the tasks. When a problem is very complex, even a gifted person’s brain has to work to solve it. The brain’s relatively high metabolic rate in this instance might reflect greater engagement with the task. If that task was out of reach for someone of average intellect, that person’s brain might be relatively inactive because of an inability to tackle the problem. And yet a bright individual’s brain might nonetheless solve a less difficult problem efficiently and with little effort as compared with someone who has a lower IQ.”

Got that? There is, however, some really useful take-home information from their article: When researchers examined the final grades of 164 Grade Eight students, together with their acceptance or rejection from a prestigious high school, they found that “scholarly success was more than twice as dependent on assessments of self-discipline as on IQ.” Students with more self-discipline—meaning that they would sacrifice short-term fun for long-term gain—were more likely to improve their marks during the school year than those who wouldn’t sacrifice fun. By contrast, a high IQ did not predict a rise in grades.

Obviously, this won’t surprise an experienced teacher or a mature parent. But it bears repeating all the same: Modern neuroscience is not overturning millennia of experience; it is filling out what the other disciplines already tell us. Our brains are very plastic organs, and paying attention determines the areas in which they develop. Like our bodies, brains must be exercised effectively to achieve our goals. That is why self-discipline is as important to brain exercise as to body exercise.

That’s also why I am skeptical when I hear jocks claim that they “can’t” pass Math or English because their specialty is throwing touchdown passes. If they paid as much attention to the Math lecturer and the English prof as they do to the coach and the trainer, they would likely get the marks they need to play for their school. Our brains are generalists, by necessity. We make them into specialists by our choices.

Now, about sleep: Does “lights out” matter? Why not stay up all night gabbing with new friends? Here’s one reason why not: Modern neuroscience shows that, contrary to older theories, our minds/brains are not passive while we sleep. In fact, Robert Stickgold and Jeffrey M. Ellenbogen relate a fascinating German experiment in which researchers taught subjects to solve a math problem by a long, tedious procedure. Subjects practiced the procedure 100 times. Then they were sent away and told to come back 12 hours later, to try it another 200 times. But the researchers had not told the subjects that there is an easy math shortcut to the problem. The researchers knew precisely when a student figured out that shortcut, because problem-solving speed suddenly increased.

Note this: Subjects who got a night's sleep between the two sessions were more than two and a half times as likely to figure out the shortcut! Fifty-nine percent of those subjects who slept discovered the trick, but only 23 percent of the others did. When we sleep, our minds organize solutions to problems, and we need to give them a chance.

The apostle Paul compares the Christian life to an athletic contest. That makes a lot of sense when we keep in mind that our brains have many of the same needs as our bodies.

Journalist Denyse O’Leary  is the author of By Design or by Chance? (Augsburg Fortress 2004), an overview of the intelligent design controversy and co-author, with Montreal neuroscientist Mario Beauregard, of The Spiritual Brain (Harper: 2007).

Comments to The payoff for straining the brain have been disabled. Thank you for your contribution.
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
William B. Ongsitco said... Philippines | Thu, 16 Oct 2008 at 10:18 pm

Hi Martin,
I checked out your website and it looks interesting...Grades definitely have a purpose. They are supposed to tell us whether certain objectives in a school curriculum are achieved or not by a kid. Now a school can have all kinds of curriculum. I think what you are trying to say is that many schools do not seem to put a premium on the development of other cognitive powers such as creativity. This is something very evident in our country. Too much emphasis is placed in rote learning. If schools include in their curriculum the development of other important cognitive skills, and if they know how to evaluate well whether such skills are acquired or not, then grades become more meaningful.


Martin Walker (brain training software) said... United States | Wed, 15 Oct 2008 at 12:49 pm

An interesting aspect of this discussion is to what extent grades are important in life. I’m not arguing that self-discipline is unimportant, but that life is about more than grades. Success, fulfillment, happiness, usefulness, creativity—all have importance.

For someone who wishes to understand the subject matter and achieve good grades, self-discipline is tremendously important. But insight and new ideas require a deeper understanding, an ability to see through established concepts.

“Engagement” seems pertinent both to self-discipline and inspiration. When we are engaged—either with the task at hand or the end result—we achieve much more. And when we are engaged with the sphere of interest, we are most likely to achieve new insight.

Martin Walker
mind evolve software
http://www.mindsparke.com


Denyse O'Leary said... Canada | Mon, 13 Oct 2008 at 10:33 pm

I’m no expert, so I am reluctant to offer advice, but here is a view from experience: I perform better when I sleep first and then get up very early. Often those early hours are very productive indeed.


Roger P. Sarmiento said... Philippines | Mon, 13 Oct 2008 at 6:44 pm

Thank you for the article. The conclusions jibe with my experiences as a student, professor, and administrator. Like my friends William and Floyd, I also stay up late sometimes to check papers and write letters. Many of us know that we need to sleep more. But we have promises to keep and miles to go before we sleep (my apologies to Robert Frost). Would anyone have advice for people in this situation?


Floyd B. said... Philippines | Sat, 11 Oct 2008 at 1:04 pm

I remember what our high school teachers would always tell us: “Do whatever you want but make sure that you be responsible for whatever happens.” It’s their subtle way of saying that we are responsible for the decisions that we make and that we should not blame others if something goes wrong. Somehow, I think that contributed a lot in our life decisions. And I think it’s something that many students today need. They have to be tough and have ambition. I think that is something that many educators should also focus on besides raising the academic grades and just making the students “behave” well in class. I have a lot of stories about average kids, doing well in class. =)


Denyse O'Leary said... Canada | Fri, 10 Oct 2008 at 7:33 am

Thank you for your kind support, Mr. Ongsitco.  It is especially important in these times when many theories about why students don’t achieve at a normal standard depend on everything except what the student chooses to focus time and attention on. For achieving normal standards, that is the key. No one claims that the jock is suddenly going to become a brilliant math ace because he does his math homework, but he is vastly more likely to get the needed B-. - d.


John A. Macdonald said... Spain | Fri, 10 Oct 2008 at 3:31 am

As a seminary professor, I agree with what Denyse and William B. Ongsitco have said.  A brilliant, but lazy student will sometimes come through with dazzling insight—and usually requires less time to do the required assignments—but those who are hard workers are the ones who come up frequently with the best results.  Unfortunately, with the educational system that we have at the secondary and most undergraduate levels in the US or here in Spain—in many places—the gifted students learn to get by with little effort and are not challenged to work to their full potential.  They are conditioned to become lazy or opt out because they their intellectual stimulation is not sufficient.


William B. Ongsitco said... Philippines | Thu, 9 Oct 2008 at 2:36 pm

Yup Denyse, ‘completely agree with you. After teaching kids for more than 16 years, I could say with certainty that what spells out academic success, more than I.Q., is self-discipline. I have met students who were not exceptionally brilliant, but were exceptionally hard-working. And as a consequence, they wound up ahead of those who, while cerebrally gifted, did not have enough performance character to accomplish their job well.


Page 1 of 1 :