Francis Phillips | Tuesday, 27 July 2010
tags : Enlightenment, Israel, scientism

The World Turned Upside Down

In an age of reason, we are behaving increasingly irrationally, contends a leading British journalist



Anyone who has read Melanie Phillips’ newspaper articles and books or who has heard her on the BBC radio programme, the “Moral Maze”, will know that she is someone of trenchant views. In this book she has brought together all her passionately-held convictions to produce a cogent indictment of the popular ideologies that underpin modern Western society. These include man-made global warming, Darwinism, multiculturalism, environmentalism and feminism, as well as a virulent, new form of anti-Semitism. It is a large list, unwieldy within the covers of a single book and constantly challenging common assumptions and prejudices.

At the outset she states, “I am an agnostic although traditionally-minded Jew.” Arguing from this perspective, she is a supporter of the Judaeo-Christian basis of Western civilisation. Indeed, she believes that our current metaphysical muddles and consequent social problems have arisen precisely because of the repudiation, on the part of the left-wing liberal intelligentsia which dominates the media, of the objective truths and values that religion once provided.

Stemming from the Enlightenment, which detached reason from faith, Phillips sees Western society as characterised “by a profound and widespread irrationality” where commonsense has been turned on its head. Some of this has taken the form of believing that the world is controlled by dark conspiracies of covert forces, an example of which includes the conviction that 9/11 was deliberately orchestrated by a Jewish cabal within the Bush administration in support of Israel and against Islamism.

Another example is the “scientism” that believes that science alone can answer all the questions in the world, including those concerning love, law, morality and beauty. So keen is scientism to exclude all questions of God that Richard Dawkins, its most celebrated spokesman, once told the author he was prepared to admit that life on earth might have been created by a governing intelligence from another planet; anything, including little green men, rather than accept the possibility of a supernatural Creator.

The danger of this approach is that in attacking such manifestly crazy ideas, the author is vulnerable to the charge of cherishing her own conspiracy theories. Is there an anti-Israeli ‘conspiracy’ on the part of the media to always support the Palestinian “victims” against their Israeli ‘aggressors’? Is this linked to a deeper, more pervasive anti-Semitism that the Holocaust did not eradicate but only drove underground, to emerge in a different but as hostile a form today? Phillips certainly believes so. Answering the obvious question, why there are so many left-wing Jews within this modern political and cultural mafia, she suggests there is a psychopathology at work (though she does not explore this further) and that most are “secular, deracinated, deeply alienated from the faith of their forefathers.”

Quite a large chunk of the book is concerned with a defence of the state of Israel and its history. “The Jews’ aspiration to their homeland does not derive from the Holocaust; it derives from Judaism itself: the religion, the people, the land.” Again, the Jews did not drive out the Arabs when Israel was created in 1948; the refugee problem was brought about by Syria and the Palestinians themselves.

Whatever the merits of Phillips’ case here, and they are considerable, I feel this question should have been dealt with in a separate book. The whole Middle Eastern question is too complex, if not intractable to sit easily alongside her more general criticism of the irrationality behind modern laws or the way “scientism” has driven faith underground. Arguing rightly, that the concept of science developed within a Western Judaeo-Christian culture, not within Buddhism or Islam, and describing Dawkins as “the Robespierre of evolutionary thinking”, she asks, how can people so devoted to reason be so irrational? How can the West mistakenly believe that reason can exist detached from the civilisation that gave it birth?

The book is a splendid and stimulating read when it is pricking the sinister or shallow nostrums of the age such as the “speciesism” of Professor Peter Singer, who believes human beings should not be given priority over animals, or the adulation given to the election of Barack Obama, who stood for “hope, love, reconciliation, youthfulness and fairies at the bottom of the garden.” Where it is flawed is the author’s belief that an objective morality (she defines this as the Mosaic Law) can survive when the beliefs that underpinned it have largely vanished.

 She is a social conservative, who wants to “repair the Judaeo-Christian principles underpinning Western civilisation” and to “uphold the dignity and human rights of every individual and the primacy of truth and reason.” Naturally one is sympathetic to this, but how can it be achieved in a post-modern society where everyone has his own subjective version of truth, “dignity” is now part of the vocabulary of euthanasia and “my rights” trump every other consideration? Phillips states that “objectivity” has been replaced by “ideology”; true, because there are no common principles guiding society or behaviour any more. The author would like to live in “a secular state in which moral rules still apply”. America struggles to hold the line here but that is because of the powerful influence of religious groups (I won’t call them the “religious right” because as Phillips rightly says, the Left demonises and thus dismisses all traditional morality as “right-wing”).

As with all her writings, this book deserves to be read. Caustic and clear-sighted, Melanie Phillips does not pull her punches. Above all, she invites a rational debate over what kind of society we want to live in, as opposed to the society we have landed ourselves with, which so often, as she skilfully demonstrates seems to have turned reason and common sense upside down.

Francis Phillips writes from Buckinghamshire, in the UK.

Want to read more articles by Francis Phillips Click on the links below


This article is published by Francis Phillips and MercatorNet.com under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.