| |
Philip Nitschke. Legislation
Analysing South Australia’s muddled euthanasia bill
Paul Russell | 02 August 2011
But before we look at the legislation itself, just think for a minute: if the bill isn’t about euthanasia, why is Phillip Nitschke in Adelaide so often? Why is he saying that he’ll set up a death clinic?
|
|
| Tags |
|
advertising,
animal euthanasia,
artificial nutrition and hydration,
Aruna Shanbaug,
assisted suicide,
Australia,
Australian Nursing Federation,
Austria,
autonomy,
BBC,
Belgium,
brain-damage,
Canada,
capital punishment,
Catholic Church,
China,
Commission on Assisted Dying,
death with dignity,
dementia,
Dignitas,
Dignity in Dying,
disability,
disabled,
do not resuscitate,
Dying in Dignity,
elder abuse,
elderly,
ethics,
Europe,
euthanasia,
euthanasia on demand,
Exit,
failed legislation,
films,
France,
futile care,
Germany,
Hawaii,
human drama,
human rights,
Idaho,
India,
internet,
Israel,
Julian Savulescu,
Lara Giddings,
law,
locked-in syndrome,
Lord Falconer,
Ludwig Minelli,
Massachusetts,
media,
medical mistakes,
medical students,
mercy killing,
misdiagnosis,
Nazi euthanasia programme,
Nembutal,
Netherlands,
New Zealand,
nursing home,
Oregeon,
Oregon,
organ donation,
organ transplant,
palliative care,
passive euthanasia,
personal testimony,
Philip Nitschke,
Philip Nitschke. legislation,
physician assisted suicide,
poll,
public opinion,
quadriplegia,
Quebec,
Russia,
Scotland,
slippery slope,
SOARS,
South Australia,
Spain,
standards of care,
suicide,
suicide pact,
Switzerland,
Tasmania,
terminal sedation,
terminology,
UK,
US,
Vermont,
Washington,
withdrawal of treatment,
YouTube,
Zurich,
|
|
SiteMap 
