| |
Artificial Nutrition And Hydration
Artificial nutrition and hydration should normally be withdrawn, says doctor
Michael Cook | 04 March 2012
An American doctor argues in the latest issue of the leading journal Bioethics that artificial nutrition and hydration should be withdrawn from all patients in a permanent vegetative state – unless there is clear evidence that they want to be kept alive.
|
|
| Tags |
|
advertising,
animal euthanasia,
artificial nutrition and hydration,
Aruna Shanbaug,
assisted suicide,
Australia,
Australian Nursing Federation,
Austria,
autonomy,
BBC,
Belgium,
BMA,
brain-damage,
Canada,
capital punishment,
Catholic Church,
China,
Commission on Assisted Dying,
death with dignity,
deliverance machine,
dementia,
Dignitas,
Dignity in Dying,
disability,
disabled,
do not resuscitate,
Dying in Dignity,
elder abuse,
elderly,
ethics,
Europe,
euthanasia,
Exit,
failed legislation,
fiction,
films,
France,
futile care,
Germany,
Hawaii,
human drama,
human rights,
Idaho,
India,
intense care,
internet,
Israel,
Italy,
Julian Savulescu,
Lara Giddings,
law,
locked-in syndrome,
Lord Falconer,
Ludwig Minelli,
Massachusetts,
media,
medical mistakes,
medical students,
mercy killing,
misdiagnosis,
Nazi euthanasia programme,
Nembutal,
Netherlands,
New Zealand,
nursing home,
Oregeon,
Oregon,
organ donation,
organ transplant,
palliative care,
palliative sedation,
passive euthanasia,
peaceful pill,
personal testimony,
Philip Nitschke,
Philip Nitschke. legislation,
physician assisted suicide,
poll,
prisons,
public opinion,
quadriplegia,
Quebec,
Queensland,
Russia,
Scotland,
slippery slope,
SOARS,
South Australia,
Spain,
standards of care,
suicide,
suicide pact,
Switzerland,
Tasmania,
terminal sedation,
terminology,
Tony Nicklinson,
UK,
US,
Vermont,
videos,
Washington,
withdrawal of treatment,
YouTube,
Zurich,
|
|
SiteMap 
