| |
Law
Unclear end-of-life concepts cloud euthanasia debate
Michael Cook | 06 April 2011
A genuine public debate on "legalising euthanasia" can only happen after a clear distinction is made between assisted suicide and euthanasia and the withholding, refusal, or withdrawal of life-sustaining measures, says a Queensland University of Technology (QUT) law academic.
Video wrap-up of Australia’s debate
Michael Cook | 02 April 2011
This short feature from Australia's ABC is a good broad-brush sketch of the issues and personalities in the local euthanasia debate.
|
|
| Tags |
|
advertising,
animal euthanasia,
artificial nutrition and hydration,
Aruna Shanbaug,
assisted suicide,
Australia,
Australian Nursing Federation,
Austria,
autonomy,
BBC,
Belgium,
BMA,
brain-damage,
Canada,
capital punishment,
Catholic Church,
China,
Commission on Assisted Dying,
death with dignity,
deliverance machine,
dementia,
Dignitas,
Dignity in Dying,
disability,
disabled,
do not resuscitate,
Dying in Dignity,
elder abuse,
elderly,
ethics,
Europe,
euthanasia,
Exit,
failed legislation,
fiction,
films,
France,
futile care,
Germany,
Hawaii,
human drama,
human rights,
Idaho,
India,
intense care,
internet,
Israel,
Italy,
Julian Savulescu,
Lara Giddings,
law,
locked-in syndrome,
Lord Falconer,
Ludwig Minelli,
Massachusetts,
media,
medical mistakes,
medical students,
mercy killing,
misdiagnosis,
Nazi euthanasia programme,
Nembutal,
Netherlands,
New Zealand,
nursing home,
Oregeon,
Oregon,
organ donation,
organ transplant,
palliative care,
palliative sedation,
passive euthanasia,
peaceful pill,
personal testimony,
Philip Nitschke,
Philip Nitschke. legislation,
physician assisted suicide,
poll,
prisons,
public opinion,
quadriplegia,
Quebec,
Queensland,
Russia,
Scotland,
slippery slope,
SOARS,
South Australia,
Spain,
standards of care,
suicide,
suicide pact,
Switzerland,
Tasmania,
terminal sedation,
terminology,
Tony Nicklinson,
UK,
US,
Vermont,
videos,
Washington,
withdrawal of treatment,
YouTube,
Zurich,
|
|
SiteMap 
