Locked-in Syndrome


Hard cases, great cases, and bad law

Paul Russell | 17 April 2012
The UK case of the plight of Locked-In suffer, Tony Nicklinson, who is seeking to ‘change the existing understanding of the common law’ on assisted suicide (effectively, murder) is by any rendering a hard case.

UK locked-in patient may set dangerous euthanasia precedent

Peter Saunders | 13 March 2012
Legal action brought by a locked-in syndrome sufferer, who wants a doctor to be able to end his ‘intolerable’ life lawfully, can go ahead following a judge's ruling today. The Ministry of Justice had previously argued that the case should be struck out on the grounds that it is a matter for Parliament, rather than the courts, to decide. But the judge's ruling today means that Mr Nicklinson's case will go to a full hearing, where medical evidence can be heard.

Most locked-in patients are happy, study finds

Michael Cook | 27 February 2011
What medical condition would definitely make life not worth living? At the top of most people’s lists would be locked-in syndrome: complete paralysis and inability to communicate other than by blinking. It was made famous in The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, a book and a film about French journalist Jean-Dominique Bauby.
 
about this blog 

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Careful newsletter
rss Subscribe to Careful RSS feed

 Recent Posts
Terrific new website to combat euthanasia in Tasmania
11 May 2012
Let’s give intellectually disabled the right to euthanasia, say Belgian humanists
27 Apr 2012
Mickey Rooney highlights the danger of elder abuse
20 Apr 2012
Hard cases, great cases, and bad law
17 Apr 2012
Flags of convenience: autonomy, dignity
11 Apr 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Population issues: Demography is Destiny
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | more >>

 Tags
advertising, animal euthanasia, artificial nutrition and hydration, Aruna Shanbaug, assisted suicide, Australia, Australian Nursing Federation, Austria, autonomy, BBC, Belgium, brain-damage, Canada, capital punishment, Catholic Church, China, Commission on Assisted Dying, death with dignity, dementia, Dignitas, Dignity in Dying, disability, disabled, do not resuscitate, Dying in Dignity, elder abuse, elderly, ethics, Europe, euthanasia, euthanasia on demand, Exit, failed legislation, films, France, futile care, Germany, Hawaii, human drama, human rights, Idaho, India, internet, Israel, Julian Savulescu, Lara Giddings, law, locked-in syndrome, Lord Falconer, Ludwig Minelli, Massachusetts, media, medical mistakes, medical students, mercy killing, misdiagnosis, Nazi euthanasia programme, Nembutal, Netherlands, New Zealand, nursing home, Oregeon, Oregon, organ donation, organ transplant, palliative care, passive euthanasia, personal testimony, Philip Nitschke, Philip Nitschke. legislation, physician assisted suicide, poll, public opinion, quadriplegia, Quebec, Russia, Scotland, slippery slope, SOARS, South Australia, Spain, standards of care, suicide, suicide pact, Switzerland, Tasmania, terminal sedation, terminology, UK, US, Vermont, Washington, withdrawal of treatment, YouTube, Zurich,