Terminal Sedation


Doubts emerge about Dutch guidelines for terminal sedation

Michael Cook | 23 July 2012
Should deep, continuous sedation at the end of life really be treated as normal medical practice in the Netherlands, ask three Dutch authors in the Journal of Medical Ethics. Although they do not appear to oppose euthanasia, they argue that “morally problematic aspects inherent to palliative sedation do not get the attention they deserve” under current guidelines. Since palliative sedation accounted for more than 12% of deaths in the Netherlands in 2010, this is an important issue.

Muddled picture of Dutch euthanasia

Michael Cook | 16 July 2012
Euthanasia in the Netherlands is nothing much to worry about, according to The Lancet. The latest survey shows that the overall levels of euthanasia and assisted suicide are about the same now as they were in 2002, when euthanasia was legalised. A small increase since 2005 is just due to the fact that more people are requesting euthanasia. At least that was the spin in The Lancet's press release.

Is terminal sedation slow euthanasia?

Paul Russell | 01 August 2011
The usual technique of euthanasia is when a doctor administers a lethal injection to a patient. However, when a doctor withdraws life-sustaining nutrition and fluid from a comatose or sedated patient, is this not a form of slow euthanasia?
 
about this blog 

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Careful newsletter
rss Subscribe to Careful RSS feed

 Recent Posts
Paternalism in the Apple Isle
9 Feb 2013
Big rise in Dutch euthanasia deaths
8 Oct 2012
Elder Abuse: Our most appalling crime
29 Sep 2012
Swiss parliament rejects more regulation of assisted suicide
28 Sep 2012
New first for Belgium: prisoner euthanasia
16 Sep 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Population issues: Demography is Destiny
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Feb 2013 | Oct 2012 | Sep 2012 | more >>

 Tags
advertising, animal euthanasia, artificial nutrition and hydration, Aruna Shanbaug, assisted suicide, Australia, Australian Nursing Federation, Austria, autonomy, BBC, Belgium, BMA, brain-damage, Canada, capital punishment, Catholic Church, China, Commission on Assisted Dying, death with dignity, deliverance machine, dementia, Dignitas, Dignity in Dying, disability, disabled, do not resuscitate, Dying in Dignity, elder abuse, elderly, ethics, Europe, euthanasia, Exit, failed legislation, fiction, films, France, futile care, Germany, Hawaii, human drama, human rights, Idaho, India, intense care, internet, Israel, Italy, Julian Savulescu, Lara Giddings, law, locked-in syndrome, Lord Falconer, Ludwig Minelli, Massachusetts, media, medical mistakes, medical students, mercy killing, misdiagnosis, Nazi euthanasia programme, Nembutal, Netherlands, New Zealand, nursing home, Oregeon, Oregon, organ donation, organ transplant, palliative care, palliative sedation, passive euthanasia, peaceful pill, personal testimony, Philip Nitschke, Philip Nitschke. legislation, physician assisted suicide, poll, prisons, public opinion, quadriplegia, Quebec, Queensland, Russia, Scotland, slippery slope, SOARS, South Australia, Spain, standards of care, suicide, suicide pact, Switzerland, Tasmania, terminal sedation, terminology, Tony Nicklinson, UK, US, Vermont, videos, Washington, withdrawal of treatment, YouTube, Zurich,