April
03
  3:59:00 PM

How voluntary is “voluntary”?

Respect for autonomy is one of the most convincing arguments for euthanasia. It was the theme of a strong defence of legalising it in Australia in the Journal of Law and Medicine by Margaret Otlowski and Lorana Bartels in 2010. They concluded that “ in a secular society with an ageing population” legalisation is inevitable.

However, in the latest issue of the JLM a criminologist at the University of Tasmania has made a vigorous response. Jeremy Prichard doubts that many people in the community will be able to give full and voluntary consent to ending their lives. He contends that the growing prevalence of elder abuse suggests that aged people could easily be manipulated.

“Such procedures may be safe for socially connected, financially independent individuals with high autonomy and self-efficacy,” he writes, but “circumstances may be entirely different for isolated patients with low self-efficacy who represent an unwanted burden to their carers, some of whom may benefit financially from the death of the patient (even just in a reduction of financial pressure).”

Sometimes the request for euthanasia may be genuine, but it has been prompted by subtle pressure. Carers may easily convince a patient that death is the best option for everyone. Dr Prichard cites some disturbing anecdotes from research into elder care in Tasmania. In one, a woman describes how she is treated by her husband:

“I had the stroke a few years ago, I’m absolutely helpless to do anything myself ... [My husband] gets annoyed because I have to go to the toilet all the time and he has to help me. ... In his own selfish way he cares for me too, it’s just that he’s so disagreeable, he’s a real disagreeable old grump, he doesn’t like anyone around ... He talks about he’ll be glad when he dies all the time and I say “well what will I do?” He says “I just hope my time will hurry up and come.” That’s my life and I’ve got to put up with it ... I couldn’t get anyone else to look after me.”

Very little research has been done on pressures that could be exerted on the elderly and disabled. “Research on the risks of voluntary euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide is in its infancy,” he writes.” So far as this article could ascertain, only one qualitative study has investigated the issues of pressure on patients to access voluntary euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.”


 
 
about this blog 

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Careful newsletter
rss Subscribe to Careful RSS feed

 Recent Posts
Paternalism in the Apple Isle
9 Feb 2013
Big rise in Dutch euthanasia deaths
8 Oct 2012
Elder Abuse: Our most appalling crime
29 Sep 2012
Swiss parliament rejects more regulation of assisted suicide
28 Sep 2012
New first for Belgium: prisoner euthanasia
16 Sep 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Population issues: Demography is Destiny
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Feb 2013 | Oct 2012 | Sep 2012 | more >>

  From MercatorNet's home page

Jolie’s Choice
20 May 2013
Angelina Jolie's decision to have a double mastectomy made headlines around the world. But is she sending women the right…

A fight for equality or a war on difference?
20 May 2013
To invite the government to give us phony equalities by recognising gay marriage is to invite greater state intervention into…

Star Trek: Into Darkness
20 May 2013
The familiar characters face very contemporary issues of terrorism and militarism in this nicely characterised film.

How legal euthanasia changed Belgium for ever
17 May 2013
The ideology of absolute self-determination has become sacred and unquestionable.

The fallacy of a happy, productive and ageing work force
17 May 2013
Glib answers will not conjure away the hard, cold fact that workers everywhere are getting older and older.


 Tags
advertising, animal euthanasia, artificial nutrition and hydration, Aruna Shanbaug, assisted suicide, Australia, Australian Nursing Federation, Austria, autonomy, BBC, Belgium, BMA, brain-damage, Canada, capital punishment, Catholic Church, China, Commission on Assisted Dying, death with dignity, deliverance machine, dementia, Dignitas, Dignity in Dying, disability, disabled, do not resuscitate, Dying in Dignity, elder abuse, elderly, ethics, Europe, euthanasia, Exit, failed legislation, fiction, films, France, futile care, Germany, Hawaii, human drama, human rights, Idaho, India, intense care, internet, Israel, Italy, Julian Savulescu, Lara Giddings, law, locked-in syndrome, Lord Falconer, Ludwig Minelli, Massachusetts, media, medical mistakes, medical students, mercy killing, misdiagnosis, Nazi euthanasia programme, Nembutal, Netherlands, New Zealand, nursing home, Oregeon, Oregon, organ donation, organ transplant, palliative care, palliative sedation, passive euthanasia, peaceful pill, personal testimony, Philip Nitschke, Philip Nitschke. legislation, physician assisted suicide, poll, prisons, public opinion, quadriplegia, Quebec, Queensland, Russia, Scotland, slippery slope, SOARS, South Australia, Spain, standards of care, suicide, suicide pact, Switzerland, Tasmania, terminal sedation, terminology, Tony Nicklinson, UK, US, Vermont, videos, Washington, withdrawal of treatment, YouTube, Zurich,