July
20
  4:58:40 PM

Right-to-die movement has split into two warring camps, says Nitschke

The right-to-die movement has split into two warring camps, according to Australian euthanasia activist Dr Philip Nitschke. Speaking at the annual conference of right-to-die societies in Zurich, he complained that half of the world federation’s board were critical of his attempts to create a do-it-yourself suicide technology and preferred to trudge along the slow path of legislative change. He denounced them as “as luddites in the face of scientifically-driven technological innovation”.

In any case, he says, the regulation of suicide is unreasonable. “Why would a seriously ill adult of sound mind subject themself under assisted suicide legislation to the rigors of medical and psychiatric assessment just to ensure their passing was peaceful?” He and his supporters are working hard to ensure that “any rational adult (over a certain age), can peacefully and reliably end their life themselves at a time of their choosing”.

Currently he is working on three projects. The first is Nembutal imported from China. The challenge here is to ensure that the powdered form is pure. Dr Nitschke’s group, Exit International, is developing “mobile testing” so that people who want to kill themselves are sure that it is at least 95% pure. “People who have their own product… will have little or no interest in legislative reform,” he says.

Second, is suffocation by breathing nitrogen in a plastic bag. Exit is also working on a cardiac monitor which will send a text as soon as the person is dead. “This will alleviate the worry by some elderly folk that they may not be found for days or weeks after death.” Finally, for paralysed people, he is working on a “deliverance machine” which will deliver a lethal injection with an eye movement”.

Dr Nitschke declared that ideally a doctor should not be a party to assisted suicide. “Why should it be the doctor who is made to feel like the executioner?” he asked, somewhat plaintively. “I am no murderer and my involvement in the right to die movement did not mean my own ethical and moral boundaries somehow didn’t matter anymore.” 


 
 
about this blog 

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Careful newsletter
rss Subscribe to Careful RSS feed

 Recent Posts
Paternalism in the Apple Isle
9 Feb 2013
Big rise in Dutch euthanasia deaths
8 Oct 2012
Elder Abuse: Our most appalling crime
29 Sep 2012
Swiss parliament rejects more regulation of assisted suicide
28 Sep 2012
New first for Belgium: prisoner euthanasia
16 Sep 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Population issues: Demography is Destiny
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Feb 2013 | Oct 2012 | Sep 2012 | more >>

  From MercatorNet's home page

EU shows how to do a dodgy survey
16 May 2013
The EU's largest-ever survey of hate crimes and discrimination against LGBT people claims that they labour under a terrible burden.…

How legal euthanasia changed Belgium for ever
17 May 2013
The ideology of absolute self-determination has become sacred and unquestionable.

The fallacy of a happy, productive and ageing work force
17 May 2013
Glib answers will not conjure away the hard, cold fact that workers everywhere are getting older and older.

What is parenthood?
15 May 2013
In debates about the family, some social scientists are asserting the primacy of theory over facts. Is this science?

Reason and responsibility: the Rana Plaza collapse
13 May 2013
The Rana Plaza tragedy was an outcome of a corrupt system that is rotten to the core. Who should --…


 Tags
advertising, animal euthanasia, artificial nutrition and hydration, Aruna Shanbaug, assisted suicide, Australia, Australian Nursing Federation, Austria, autonomy, BBC, Belgium, BMA, brain-damage, Canada, capital punishment, Catholic Church, China, Commission on Assisted Dying, death with dignity, deliverance machine, dementia, Dignitas, Dignity in Dying, disability, disabled, do not resuscitate, Dying in Dignity, elder abuse, elderly, ethics, Europe, euthanasia, Exit, failed legislation, fiction, films, France, futile care, Germany, Hawaii, human drama, human rights, Idaho, India, intense care, internet, Israel, Italy, Julian Savulescu, Lara Giddings, law, locked-in syndrome, Lord Falconer, Ludwig Minelli, Massachusetts, media, medical mistakes, medical students, mercy killing, misdiagnosis, Nazi euthanasia programme, Nembutal, Netherlands, New Zealand, nursing home, Oregeon, Oregon, organ donation, organ transplant, palliative care, palliative sedation, passive euthanasia, peaceful pill, personal testimony, Philip Nitschke, Philip Nitschke. legislation, physician assisted suicide, poll, prisons, public opinion, quadriplegia, Quebec, Queensland, Russia, Scotland, slippery slope, SOARS, South Australia, Spain, standards of care, suicide, suicide pact, Switzerland, Tasmania, terminal sedation, terminology, Tony Nicklinson, UK, US, Vermont, videos, Washington, withdrawal of treatment, YouTube, Zurich,