Are the kids really all right?

comment   | print |


"Were a gay and happy family wagon" by Melinda - originally posted to
Flickr as Children in Wagon (Part 2). via Wikimedia Commons


There can be no more contentious issue in sociology than whether same-sex couples do as good a job raising kids as married biological parents. As state after state in the US opens the door to same-sex marriage, judge after judge has affirmed the “no difference” thesis. The kids are OK. Occasionally a social science study even finds that kids do better when they grow up with gay parents.

The sentiments of California Judge Vaughn Walker, in his 2012 decision overturning Proposition 8, have been repeated numerous by judges ruling in favour of same-sex marriage:

“Children raised by gay or lesbian parents are as likely as children raised by heterosexual parents to be healthy, successful… click here to read whole article and make comments



The must-watch video on same-sex marriage

comment   | print |

In this hour-long lecture, Ryan T. Anderson, of the Heritage Foundation in Washington DC, makes a reasoned case for opposing same-sex marriage on public policy grounds. He speaks rapidly and covers a lot of ground. But it is well-worth watching.

This event was videoed at Stanford University where he was a guest of the student-run Anscombe Society. His presence on campus generated a controversy because some students objected to his “hate speech”. 

It's a great summary of the main arguments. Watch it. 

click here to read whole article and make comments



A long and winding road

comment   | print |



Surfing the (Catholic) net is not a mindless occupation. You can stumble on some wonderful articles; indeed, depending on what you read and your state of mind when you read it, an inspiring personal account of faith might be enough to trigger a change in your life. The internet, despite its reputation for easy corruption, can be a school of evangelisation just as any other means. The trick, as with choosing friends, is to select sites that encourage “the better angels of your nature” rather than those which merely confirm – or feed -your personal weaknesses or vices.

By way of this preamble I came across a most uplifting article written earlier this year for the Christendom Awake website. Entitled “How I became a Catholic” it was by author and journalist Philip Trower. I happen to have known Philip for nearly 25 years and have enjoyed… click here to read whole article and make comments



A deeply amoral defence of same-sex marriage

comment   | print |

Last week the US Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously upheld a district-court ruling that had struck down same-sex marriage bans in Indiana and Wisconsin. Judge Richard Posner wrote the decision, a brilliant piece of rhetoric which was studded with sparkling one-liners and dripping with sarcasm. “Hero Federal Appeals Judge Burns Down the Case Against Gay Marriage” was the headline in Gawker, a widely-read website. “A masterpiece of wit and logic,” was the verdict of Slate’s columnist.

Since the 75-year-old Posner is the most-cited legal scholar of the 20th Century and one of America’s leading public intellectuals, his views are bound to be influential as same-sex marriage heads for the Supreme Court.

But stripped of their sequinned garments Posner’s views are not as muscle-bound as they first appear.

His strength is identifying absurd inconsistencies in arguments and using them to pry open the door… click here to read whole article and make comments



“Parade of empathy” halted by same-sex marriage ruling

comment   | print |

judge feldmanJudge Martin Feldman

There’s something to be said for longevity. At 80 years of age you can say what you want to say and go down with all guns blazing. That’s my impression of a US federal judge who broke ranks with dozens of his brethren on Wednesday to defend the meaning of marriage, and ruled that Louisiana has no obligation to recognise same-sex unions as marriage.

USA Today reports:

The ruling came from District Judge Martin Feldman, 80, who was named to the federal bench by President Ronald Reagan more than 30 years ago. He echoed the two judges — both in their 70s and appointed by President George H.W. Bush — who dissented from recent rulings against Utah, Oklahoma and Virginia gay marriage bans in the 10th and 4th Circuits.

There might be other septuagenarians and octogenarians in the judiciary who… click here to read whole article and make comments



Utah struggles to defend monogamous, man-woman marriage

comment   | print |

sister wivesKody Brown poses with his wives at one of their homes in Las Vegas.
Photograph: Guardian/Jerry Henkel /AP


The Mormon stronghold of Utah is trying to defend its laws on marriage on two fronts, same-sex marriage and polygamy, but courts are not on the state’s side. Last week federal judge Clark Waddoups finalised an order striking down part of Utah’s law against bigamy in a drawn out lawsuit by Kody Brown and his four “sister wives” against the state.

The Browns are part of a sect with Mormon roots who feature in the television show “Sister Wives”. It was after this show first went to air four years ago that the state began its investigation of the polygamist family. They are framing the issue as one of religious freedom.

Utah’s Attorney General Sean Reyes says he will appeal Waddoups’ ruling, but the… click here to read whole article and make comments



No rush to the registry office by UK same-sex couples

comment   | print |

gays uk
One of the first couples to take advantage of the UK law. Photo: BBC / Reuters


The first official count of same-sex marriages in the UK since they were legalised last year has been published, and it is a "disappointing” figure, according to British academic Mike Thomas:

According to figures released by the Office for National Statistics, just 1,409 same-sex couples were married in England and Wales from the end of March to the end of June 2014. This is a relatively low number in comparison to the 7,000 or so couples across the UK who entered into civil partnerships in the same period of time after they were first made available in 2005.

More seismic statistics might have been expected, given the political storm that surrounded the 2013 act that sanctioned same-sex marriage and… click here to read whole article and make comments



States have authority to define marriage

comment   | print |



Last week we noted an appeals court hearing where one of the three judges queried the use of the courts instead of the democratic process by gay activists promoting same-sex marriage.

This week Ryan Anderson draws attention to the decision of a judge in Tennessee which upholds that state's Constitutional authority to define marriage as the union of a man and a woman

In a post at The Daily Signal Ryan says: 

The case involved a same-sex couple married in Iowa that sought a divorce in Tennessee. Because Tennessee does not recognize same-sex relationships as marriages, it was unable to divorce the couple. Last week, Judge Russell E. Simmons, Jr., cited the Supreme Court’s decision in the federal Defense of Marriage Act case, U.S. v. Windsor, as support that Tennessee has the right to define marriage for itself. Simmons writes: “The Windsor case is… click here to read whole article and make comments



Three ways to happiness

comment   | print |

Desire of the Everlasting Hills from Everlasting Hills on Vimeo.

On the Christian side, there’s often more than a smidgen of repugnant smugness in rejection of the gay lifestyle. Summed up in the slogan “pray away the gay”, Christian moral teaching is prescribed by some pastors and parents as if it were aspirin. Aspirin is no cure for wounded hearts.

On the gay side, there’s often a deep hostility towards “life-denying”, “nay-saying” Christian ethics. Gay writers sneer at the power of religion and regard it as a kind of brainwashing. That is just dumb. If faith changed geniuses like Augustine and Pascal, why can't it work today? 

What’s missing in this often vituperative clash is real people, not cardboard cut-outs but people yearning for love, meaning, transcendence and redemption from their own pettiness. This is what the deeply moving documentary Desire of the Everlasting Hills provides. In it… click here to read whole article and make comments



Appeals judge to gay rights advocates: why use the courts?

comment   | print |

gays court
Photo: Al Behrman/AP


What the New York Times correctly calls “the steady march of judicial approval for same-sex marriage over the past year” hit a speed bump, if not a road block, this week as the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit heard arguments in six same-sex marriages cases appealed by four states.

Judges have been marching in lock-step to overturn democratic laws which define marriage as the union of a man and a woman. More than more than two dozen lower courts and two appeals courts have ruled that gay couples have a right to marry. Some states have fought back, including Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee, whose cases came before three judges of Sixth Circuit this week.

“Who gets to decide what the definition of marriage is?” asked Aaron D. Lindstrom, solicitor general of Michigan.

And for once, it seems,… click here to read whole article and make comments


Page 3 of 29 :  < 1 2 3 4 5 >  Last ›

Conjugality deals with the true nature of marriage and the challenges it faces today. Our current focus is on the campaign to legalise same-sex marriage. We'd love to get your comments and suggestions. Send an email to conjugality@mercatornet.com

rss Conjugality RSS feed

Follow MercatorNet
subscribe to newsletter
Sections and Blogs
Family Edge
Sheila Reports
Reading Matters
Demography Is Destiny
Conniptions (the editorial)
contact us
our ideals
our People
Mercator who?
partner sites
audited accounts
advice for writers
New Media Foundation
Suite 12A, Level 2
5 George Street
North Strathfield NSW 2137

+61 2 8005 8605
skype: mercatornet
© New Media Foundation 2015 | powered by Encyclomedia | designed by Elleston