Re-examining a controversial gay parenting study

comment   | print |

gay parentingThe journal Demography has published a reexamination of a 2010 study that found no significant differences between same-sex and opposite-sex parenting outcomes. William C. Duncan reports:

The journal Demography has just published a very interesting article that reexamines the claims of a 2010 study that suggested (and was widely reported) as showing that children raised by same-sex couples experienced no academic disadvantages. The catch of the earlier study was that it was significantly different from previous studies on same-sex children and their parents since it used a large sample from the Census rather than a small self-selected one which is more typical of this body of research.

The 2010 study had excluded children who were not biologically related to the head of household and who were not in the same home for at least five years. This reduced “the sample size by more than one-half.” The 2012 study explains that putting the children… click here to read whole article and make comments



Apropos France, again

comment   | print |

What do you do if you are in charge of a big, failing, European economy? Legalise same-sex "marriage", apparently. You'd think French Prime Minister Francois Hollande would have bigger poissons to fry, judging by an Economist leader article whic reads, in part:

As our special report in this issue explains, France still has many strengths, but its weaknesses have been laid bare by the euro crisis. For years it has been losing competitiveness to Germany and the trend has accelerated as the Germans have cut costs and pushed through big reforms. Without the option of currency devaluation, France has resorted to public spending and debt. Even as other EU countries have curbed the reach of the state, it has grown in France to consume almost 57% of GDP, the highest share in the euro zone. Because of the failure to balance a single budget since 1981, public debt has risen from 22% of GDP then to over 90%… click here to read whole article and make comments



Huge rally in France to defend marriage

comment   | print |


This report from LifeSite News via the National Organisation for Marriage blog shows that there are plenty of French people ready to defend marriage against new definitions.

Hundreds of thousands of traditional marriage supporters demonstrated against same-sex “marriage” in France over the weekend.

On Saturday, a nationwide rally drew an estimated 200,000 protesters in Paris according to organizers, with tens of thousands more attending rallies throughout the country.

Almost 30,000 traditional marriage supporters demonstrated in the city of Lyon, according to a Reuters report. Police there reported that 40 counter-protesters were arrested after they attempted to disrupt the rally.

Police in Toulouse reported that tear gas was used to break up a group of homosexual activists who tried to interfere with the gathering of five thousand traditional marriage supporters.

Le Parisien reports that between 6,000 and 8,000 people… click here to read whole article and make comments



The looming dictatorship of the “egalitarians”

comment   | print |

We’re heading for economic dictatorship writes Janet Daly in today’s Sunday Telegraph. But another story carries a grimmer message – that Britain is already in the grip of a more pervasive and sinister dictatorship. “Primary school teachers 'could face sack' for refusing to promote gay marriage” according to John Bingham, the paper’s religious affairs editor.

He reports that an education Minister, Liz Truss, has refused to rule out the possibility that teachers, even in faith schools, could face disciplinary action for objecting on grounds of conscience following legislation now being prepared by the British Government. This has been revealed in correspondence between a Christian member of parliament who asked Ms. Truss’ colleague, the equalities minister, raising concerns about the impact on schools of the Coalition’s plans to change the marriage laws.

The MP’s question followed a startling  legal opinion given by Mr. Aidan  O’Neill QC, an expert on human rights, reported… click here to read whole article and make comments



“Without nature, the little children suffer”

comment   | print |


That heading on an ABC (Australia) op-ed leapt out at me from the webpage. I immediately thought of the little children who are being inserted into unnatural "families" formed by same-sex couples, deprived of the nurture of their natural mother or father, or both.

The article is about the non-human environment, which the social progressives rightly want to protect, but some of its observations are very ironic when applied to humanity -- which, after all, has its own nature, although the social avant garde do not seem to care at all about that.

The author waxes lyrical about the importance of exposing children to the natural environment from an early age (which I certainly agree with). For example:

We may have disconnected from nature, but we are delusional if we think we can live without it. Ignoring the value and contribution of nature to our well being is,… click here to read whole article and make comments



Marriage on the rocks

comment   | print |


The likely result of gay and lesbian pressure groups pushing for the redefining of marriage is going to be that the institution will become a meaningless charade and disappear from the face of the earth. This is the ultimate conclusion of William J. Haun, a lawyer in Washington, D.C., writing in the current issue of First Things.

 If what is being pushed for in this campaign is achieved then ultimately the institution of marriage will mean nothing at all.  Haun argues that if all it takes for the government to choose (or not choose) to license its existence is it be identified as friendship, dating relationship, or any relationship that has love with a remote possibility of sex, then nearly all relationships will constitute a marriage; and thus no relationship will constitute a marriage.

 Haun approaches his argument from the angle of those who argue for limited government and points to an… click here to read whole article and make comments



Devaluing the currency

comment   | print |

The election is over and Mitt Romney may be yesterday’s man. But some of the issues which – well, if not quite central were certainly featuring  - in the campaign are far from yesterday’s issues. The definition of marriage was one of them.

Among the things which were disturbing on the campaign periphery was the vitriolic and abusive language which some commentators in the mainstream media – if the Huffington Post can now be described as such – are prepared to descend to in the debate on this issue.

Frances Kelly, on her Home Griddle blog, points to one example. Can anyone show a parallel example of this from the other side of the debate? We hope not – and hope that it remains that way. This is a debate in which right reason and not emotion should remain the currency of exchange. Those who devalue that currency might gain power over… click here to read whole article and make comments



How the Maine vote was won

comment   | print |

In 2009 voters in Maine overturned by 53 to 47 percent a state law that would have allowed same-sex marriage. This week the Maine electorate reversed that vote, answering “Yes” to the question "Do you want to allow the State of Maine to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples?" by 54 to 46 percent.

What happened? A lot of things, but the video below probably identifies the key factor: two-and half years of targeted door knocking and “persuasion conversations” by over 1500 foot-soldiers, reaching 250,000 people… Very scientific. It no doubt cost a lot, too - or were these all volunteers with day jobs?

(If the video disappears from this page here is the link to WSJ: 

click here to read whole article and make comments



Compulsory membership legal group backs same-sex marriage

comment   | print |

barThe following is from a news release by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a group of US lawyers defending freedom of conscience cases:

A group of concerned attorneys, required by law to be dues-paying members of the Washington State Bar Association, are objecting to the association's public support for R-74, a measure that seeks to redefine marriage in the state. The lawyers, who do not support R-74, have sent a strongly worded letter to the bar citing the bar’s own rules and a U.S. Supreme Court decision that says mandatory bars can’t take sides on such matters.

“No one should take your money to promote views with which you strongly disagree. By forcing all Washington attorneys to pay for bar dues and then use that money to take any position on this measure is clearly wrong. The bar is violating its own rules and ignoring a U.S. Supreme Court decision that… click here to read whole article and make comments



So same-sex marriage “won’t hurt you”?

comment   | print |

A couple who ran a bed and breakfast business in Vermont were sued, convicted and fined for unjust discrimination after same-sex marriage was legalised in the state.

click here to read whole article and make comments


Page 1 of 2 :  1 2 > 

Conjugality deals with the true nature of marriage and the challenges it faces today. Our current focus is on the campaign to legalise same-sex marriage. We'd love to get your comments and suggestions. Send an email to

rss Conjugality RSS feed

Follow MercatorNet
subscribe to newsletter
Sections and Blogs
Family Edge
Sheila Reports
Reading Matters
Demography Is Destiny
Conniptions (the editorial)
contact us
our ideals
our People
Mercator who?
partner sites
audited accounts
advice for writers
New Media Foundation
Suite 12A, Level 2
5 George Street
North Strathfield NSW 2137
+61 2 8005 8605
skype: mercatornet
© New Media Foundation 2016 | powered by Encyclomedia | designed by Elleston