August
29th
 
6:49:30 AM

Fined $30,000 for defending marriage

What’s the price for defending gender-integrated marriage?

How much did it cost a Vermont business to live out its faith?

The answer:  $30,000.

Two women from New York, Kate Baker and Ming Linsley, sued the Wildflower Inn of Vermont for declining to host their wedding reception.

The owners of the inn, Jim and Mary O'Reilly, are Catholic and believe in pro-gender marriage.  They refused to celebrate the marriage of the gender-segregated couple.

The American Civil Liberties Union helped the monogender couple win their lawsuit.

An ACLU statement said, 

A Vermont resort . . . finalized an agreement to resolve the lawsuit today. As part of the settlement, the resort will pay $10,000 to the Vermont Human Rights Commission as a civil penalty and will place $20,000 in a charitable trust to be disbursed by the couple.

 According to the ACLU press release, Vermont law prohibits businesses from recognizing gender differences: As part of the settlement agreement, however, the Wildflower Inn agreed that Vermont law prohibits unequal treatment of same-sex couples.  As part of the settlement, the resort agreed to stop hosting wedding receptions for all couples.

Is this justice?  Forcing people to celebrate gender-segregated marriage in violation of their religious beliefs?

Apparently Vermont courts believe gender segregation in marriage trumps gender diversity.  And the right to discriminate against men in marriage is more important than religious liberty.

Next time someone asks your opinion of same-sex marriage, remember the Wildflower Inn and how much they were fined for defending pro-gender marriage.




to make a comment, click here

This article is published by Frances Kelly and MercatorNet.com under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.


 
about this blog | 

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Conjugality
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
French blowback: “François, ta loi, on en veut pas!”
26 May 2013
French marriage activists vow to fight on
23 May 2013
For the sake of future generations
22 May 2013
Defending traditional marriage
19 May 2013
World Congress of Families starts in Sydney this week
16 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | Feb 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

The Boy Scouts cave in
24 May 2013
Under enormous pressure, they have voted to welcome openly gay scouts. What message does the change in policy send young…

A boy’s life with unisex scouts
23 May 2013
The Boy Scouts of America will vote today on whether they will admit homosexual scouts. Will they become the Unisex…

Necessary excuses
23 May 2013
“Comfort women”, carpet bombing, atom bombs, lethal drones and genocide can all be justified by appeals to necessity.

Digital multitasking: scourge or blessing?
22 May 2013
How can we teach students to focus on what they ought to be doing?

Who or what is a “child”?
22 May 2013
Canada's Parliament lacks the courage to take a stand on defining when an unborn child will be protected by the…


 Tags
2012 elections, abortion, Australia, Barack Obama, Britain, Catholic Church, conscience, divorce, education, European Union, euthanasia, family, family values, France, homosexuality, human rights, Ireland, IVF, marriage, New Zealand, parenting, philosophy, religious freedom, Russia, same-sex marriage, same-sex parenting, sex education, UK, United States, US,