October
17th
 
2:56:31 PM

Heterosexuality “not the norm”, says Australian school programme

schoolkids

The normalisation of same-sex relationships received a setback recently in Australia when the federal parliament lower and upper houses threw out bills that would have allowed same-sex “marriage”. Nevertheless, the normalisation campaign continues on many fronts.

A report in the Australian Daily Telegraph today reveals that a programme teaching that it is wrong to regard heterosexuality as the norm for relationships is being piloted in 12 schools in the Australian state of New South Wales. There’s a similar programme in the state of Victoria. Academics and sexual libertarian groups such as Family Planning have had a heavy hand in them.

The target of these programmes is not just anti-gay discrimination and bullying but something much more radical -- what the theorists of the sexual diversity movement call “heteronormativity”. Training for teachers in the Proud Schools scheme advises them to “focus on the dominance of heterosexism rather than on homophobia”. Watch out for that other h-word.

The program defines "heterosexism" as the practice of "positioning heterosexuality as the norm for human relationship," according to the Proud Schools Consultation Report.

"It involves ignoring, making invisible or discriminating against non-heterosexual people, their relationships and their interests. Heterosexism feeds homophobia."

Such programmes assert that gender and sexuality are not fixed but fluid concepts. Students are taught not to think about gender and sexuality in a "binary" way, as in male/female or gay/straight, but as part of a continuum of choices.

The pilot programme, which is costing AU$250,000, is to be “made available” to non-government schools, according to a statement made by the NSW education minister, Adrian Piccoli, last year. The minister seems to realise he is on shaky ground with this scheme as he has tried to distance himself from it this week, pointing out that it was launched under a former (Labour) government.

Daily Telegraph columnist Miranda Devine gives further details of the Proud Schools programme in a blog entry, including its highly questionable assumptions.

Prevalence of homosexuality. The programme draws on a paper by Latrobe University academics claiming that there is “strong evidence in 2011 that approximately one in 10 young people are sexually attracted to people of their own sex, or are unsure.” As Devine points out, this contradicts not only the generally accepted figure of 2 to 3 percent, but figures from Latrobe itself.

In fact the most comprehensive survey of sexuality in this country was also by LaTrobe University, in its 2003 Sex in Australia report which found 1.6 per cent of Australian men identify as homosexual and 0.9 per cent as bisexual. For women the figures are 0.8 per cent who identified as homosexual and 1.4 per cent as bisexual.

Prevalence of homophobic abuse in schools. Another Latrobe study used in drafting the programme found that 80 percent of homophobic abuse and violence for young people occurs at schools and that "violence and abuse is sustained and embedded in school culture". It claims homophobia has increased recently and it linked with self harm.

Oddly enough, though, principals quoted in a report for the scheme said they did not have much overt homophobia at their schools, and the NSW Education Department has had no complaints.

Over the past seven years The Daily Telegraph's education reporter Bruce McDougall has been monitoring NSW Education Department safety and security incident reports of violence and other problems at schools. He has not seen one report relating to homophobia.

The report sounds dismissive of teachers whose views do not concur with its own bias. After all, what would people who actually teach kids every day and do playground duty and coach sports know?




to make a comment, click here

This article is published by Carolyn Moynihan and MercatorNet.com under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.


 
about this blog | 

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Conjugality
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Can same-sex marriage and religious freedom coexist?
19 Jun 2013
Fewer marriages, fewer fathers
16 Jun 2013
Who invented marriage? Not the Church. Not the State.
12 Jun 2013
“Gays against gay marriage”
11 Jun 2013
Australian defender of marriage passes away
10 Jun 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Jun 2013 | May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Squatters on Europe’s Christian heritage
19 Jun 2013
Can human dignity find a firm foundation in secularism?

Networks of responsibility: the Philadelphia building collapse
18 Jun 2013
Who should ultimately take the blame in a tragedy of careless demolition which caused six deaths?

“Man of Steel”
18 Jun 2013
Finally we have an excellent adaptation of everyone's favourite comic book hero.

What really happens to women who have abortions?
18 Jun 2013
Once again, the New York Times ignores the evidence and backs supporters of abortion.

“But if I am only for myself, what am I?”
17 Jun 2013
Canadian columnist Barbara Kay reflects on her upbringing and the issues that have made her a major controversialist.


 Tags
2012 elections, abortion, Australia, Barack Obama, Britain, Catholic Church, conscience, divorce, education, European Union, euthanasia, family, family values, France, homosexuality, human rights, Ireland, IVF, marriage, New Zealand, parenting, philosophy, religious freedom, Russia, same-sex marriage, same-sex parenting, sex education, UK, United States, US,