June
08th
  3:33:48 PM

Why I might, at last, read science fiction

Hi there,

Science fiction has never been high on my reading list. There was The Day of the Triffids that was required reading at school, and after that, well, I simply don’t remember. But after reading Walter Pless’s valediction for Ray Bradbury and glancing at a couple of other obituaries today, I feel that I have missed out on something. Not just the stories, but on the man who wrote them and who, from all accounts, was a spontaneous and generous human being, unspoiled by success and totally in love with his craft. Another plus: he had a 56-year marriage with his wife Marguerite, and four daughters.

Bradbury was eccentric in a rather charming way: he never travelled by air or drove a car. And although he foresaw an uncanny number of technological developments, he criticised the use of computers and the internet. But he achieved what few writers today seem able to do today -- he captured the attention of boys. From what I hear, anyone who can get boys to read books deserves profound respect. Of course, there is stiffer competition these days from techno gadgetry, but perhaps there is also some vital ingredient lacking in much of what is churned out for teenagers.

This is a clue I picked up: Bradbury said that all of his stories, no matter how fantastic or frightening they might be, were metaphors for everyday life. And they all came from his childhood. “The great thing about my life is that everything I’ve done is a result of what I was when I was 12 or 13,” he said in 1982. I like the sound of that creativity anchored in real human experience. Perhaps that is why I am more likely to read Fahrenheit 451 than Twilight or The Hunger Games.

In other articles today: Michael Cook plays devil’s advocate to Canadian writer and convert to Catholicism Michael Coren, who has just published a book called Heresey: Ten Lies they Spread About Christianity. Lawyer James Cole explains the judicial legerdemain that enabled a US appeals court last week to declare part of the Defence of marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional. And George Friedman discerns the twilight of counterinsurgency wars.

Cheers,


Carolyn Moynihan,
Deputy Editor,
MercatorNet


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Recent Posts
Dumb question, I know, but why was I there?
18 May 2013
Gosnell guilty
14 May 2013
does it matter if the most influential economist of the 20th century was gay?
10 May 2013
Terrorism triangle in Boston
8 May 2013
An unscheduled appearance
4 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | Feb 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

EU shows how to do a dodgy survey
16 May 2013
The EU's largest-ever survey of hate crimes and discrimination against LGBT people claims that they labour under a terrible burden.…

How legal euthanasia changed Belgium for ever
17 May 2013
The ideology of absolute self-determination has become sacred and unquestionable.

The fallacy of a happy, productive and ageing work force
17 May 2013
Glib answers will not conjure away the hard, cold fact that workers everywhere are getting older and older.

What is parenthood?
15 May 2013
In debates about the family, some social scientists are asserting the primacy of theory over facts. Is this science?

Reason and responsibility: the Rana Plaza collapse
13 May 2013
The Rana Plaza tragedy was an outcome of a corrupt system that is rotten to the core. Who should --…