June
18th
  2:30:10 PM

Is Rural New Zealand Dying Out?

Once a year in New Zealand the National Agricultural Fieldays are held in the Waikato (a couple of hours south of Auckland).  At the Fieldays you can find all manner of things rural. Farmers come to buy tractors, to look at new inventions and generally to catch up with people, procedures and things in the farming world. For some reason when I was little (about ten years old) I thought that going to the Fieldays would be awesome, up there with visiting Disneyland. Only in New Zealand I suppose.

This year though demography stuck its ubiquitous head in the door at Fieldays.  The Waikato University organised a seminar by Dr Jacques Poot, a professor of population economics at the National Institute of Demographic and Economic Analysis.  Over the next 20 years, according to Poot, New Zealand’s rural areas are doomed to age and to shrink.  Currently 86% of New Zealand’s population is urban and this proportion is set to increase thanks to “agglomeration” – a global trend of continuing urbanisation. At the moment just over half of the world’s population is urban, but this is expected to rise to two-thirds by 2050.  In a similar way, Poot predicts that by 2031, all local authority areas that had populations that were classified as “rural” would be in decline (except western Bay of Plenty). 

This raises a couple of questions and issues. First, New Zealand is heavily dependent on its agricultural export sector, particularly the dairy sector.  Will an ageing and declining rural population mean that there will be fewer people willing to take over the running of New Zealand’s farms? Will there be fewer people living in small towns that provide services for the surrounding farming district? In short, what will our population change mean for New Zealand’s agricultural sector, and therefore New Zealand’s economy? Secondly, will it take longer for most New Zealander’s to realise how our population is changing? If the vast majority of us live in cities and these cities are growing (or not declining at the same rate as rural areas) it should not be a surprise that many people will not realise how the population as a whole is changing. If the places where people live are increasing at the expense of other areas, then people will naturally conclude that from their own personal experiences the population is growing or continuing as it was before. The fact that other areas are becoming depopulated is harder to grasp than the fact that the city where you live has continued to grow.  This last point is applicable right around the world as it continues to become more urbanised.  Since we mostly live in concentrated pockets of humanity, all we see is overcrowding and population growth. This may blind us, even if only at a subconscious level, to the wider demographic changes affecting our country and our world.

 



to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Japan - Where did the children go?
22 May 2013
Migrants set to become majority in UK
22 May 2013
A shortage of women workers in China pushes up wages
20 May 2013
Chinese Author Ma Jian and the One-Child Policy
17 May 2013
Bugs for Breakfast anyone?
15 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | Feb 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Necessary excuses
23 May 2013
“Comfort women”, carpet bombing, atom bombs, lethal drones and genocide can all be justified by appeals to necessity.

A boy’s life with unisex scouts
23 May 2013
The Boy Scouts of America will vote today on whether they will admit homosexual scouts. Will they become the Unisex…

Digital multitasking: scourge or blessing?
22 May 2013
How can we teach students to focus on what they ought to be doing?

Who or what is a “child”?
22 May 2013
Canada's Parliament lacks the courage to take a stand on defining when an unborn child will be protected by the…

We’re all mad here
21 May 2013
That's the message of the new edition of the bible for American psychiatrists, DSM-5. Diagnostic inflation is about to become…


 Tags
propaganda, International, Zimbabwe, Curtin University, population growth, Population Centre, sex selective abortions, Switzerland, Demographic Summit, nursing homes, labour market, Pope Benedict XVI, Western Australia, Age, Brendan O'Neill, Muslims, shortages, Korea, Malaysia, family structure, Year of the Dragon, family planning, business, Turkey, Internet use, South Korea, World Health Organisation, WHO, Muslim-Christian demography, volunteering, Denmark, Auckland, IVF, modernity, Oxfam, birth rate, UNICEF, aging population, European Union, Easter, videos, Replacement Rate, United States Elections, National Identity, loneliness, utilitarianism, population projections, Mining, urban population, Israel, Paul Ehrlich, Waitangi Day, Baby Roberts, Catholic church, contraceptives, Norman Borlaug, Belfast, India, Housing, Finland, antibiotics, Statistics, food supply, Population, American politics, Crime, New Forests Company, Baby Bonus, homosexuality, Politics, Census, Ethiopia, climate change, immigration reform, Educated women, Japan tsunami, Jersey, internet, Elderly care, military, Africa, centenarian, HIV, Retirement, Lancet, Chian, Poverty, one-child policy, Liechtenstein, Melinda Gates, fertitily, elections, election, euthanasia, Lithuania, population control, Canna, Disabilities, Birth Control, youth unemployment, Urbanisation,