August
15th
  9:16:55 AM

And in this Corner…

Unlike so many countries in the world (like say, Scotland or Cuba) the Philippines is not in danger of having to rely on immigration to prop up its demographic future. With a birth rate well in excess of 3 children per woman (down from 7.4 sixty years ago) the Philippines is still a growing population. It is in the position of being able to export workers to other countries who need the help (for example, Singapore).

However, at the moment the Philippines is debating whether its population growth is desirable or whether the Government needs to do something about it.  When other countries are trying to get people to pair up and breed for the future, the Philippines President, Benigno Aquino has pushed forward a controversial health bill that subsidizes contraception.  According to the Wall Street Journal:

“The reproductive health bill – which would also mandate sex education and widen family planning offerings – passed an important hurdle Monday, when lawmakers decided to end long periods of debate on the issue so that a vote can be held, most likely in the next several weeks. If the bill passes in the Philippines House, backers would also need to get support from the Philippines Senate before the law can be enforced.”

The supporters of this bill are worried that if something is not done, then the Philippines will not be able to afford required infrastructure – roads, hospitals, schools etc – and will be unable to deal with poverty. In short, the Philippines must lower its population growth to become rich. As you may imagine, in a very Catholic country like the Philippines, there are vocal opponents to the bill. For example:

“Archbishop Oscar Cruz, a veteran Catholic leader, said on the online news portal rappler.com that the bill ‘hates life, wants to do away with life’ and questioned the economic value of efforts to rein in the country’s reproductive rates.”

But perhaps the hardest-hitting opponent of the bill is the Congressman representing the district of Sarangani, boxing icon Manny Pacquiao.  As the Wall Street Journal reports, Pacquiao has “hit out” against the bill and has “com[e] out swinging”:

“God said, ‘Go out and multiply.’ He did not say, just have two or three kids,” [Pacquiao] said in an interview earlier this year with the Philippines’ GMA Network…Mr. Pacquiao has continued to reference contraception as one of his key political issues, arguing that lawmakers should instead focus on laws that would alleviate poverty, rather than using government funds to subsidize birth control.”

While it is unlikely that Pacquiao’s opposition will be a knock-out blow to the bill, it does give opponents a well-known figure to rally around and will undoubtedly help their message to get out to a wider audience.  The debate has been raging on and off for ten years now in the Philippines, so it fair to say: watch this space; there are a few rounds to go before the final bell.



to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Japan - Where did the children go?
22 May 2013
Migrants set to become majority in UK
22 May 2013
A shortage of women workers in China pushes up wages
20 May 2013
Chinese Author Ma Jian and the One-Child Policy
17 May 2013
Bugs for Breakfast anyone?
15 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | Feb 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Necessary excuses
23 May 2013
“Comfort women”, carpet bombing, atom bombs, lethal drones and genocide can all be justified by appeals to necessity.

A boy’s life with unisex scouts
23 May 2013
The Boy Scouts of America will vote today on whether they will admit homosexual scouts. Will they become the Unisex…

Digital multitasking: scourge or blessing?
22 May 2013
How can we teach students to focus on what they ought to be doing?

Who or what is a “child”?
22 May 2013
Canada's Parliament lacks the courage to take a stand on defining when an unborn child will be protected by the…

We’re all mad here
21 May 2013
That's the message of the new edition of the bible for American psychiatrists, DSM-5. Diagnostic inflation is about to become…


 Tags
psychology, Bollywood, 7 billion people, Western Australia, Roger Short, Muslim-Christian demography, EU, demographic decline, Twins, sustainable development, austria, Cuba, East Timor, Elderly, Muslims, retirement age, religion in public square, Rugby World Cup, Older Mothers, Canada, elderly, population decline, gender imbalance, UNICEF, birth rate, Optimum Population Trust, Apocalypse, Belgium, gonorrhea, fertitily, Nicholas Eberstadt, Birth Defects, democracy, unemployment, humanism, Romney campaign, Parental Happiness, subsidy, Christmas, Nigeria, Border security, French-Canadians, nursing homes, sex ratio, sterilisation, Rome, Catholic church, Al Gore, population estimates, disease, pensions, Recession, Denmark, Demographic Intelligence, disasters, South Korea, travel, population growth, spending, saving, Roe v. Wade, Olympics, Scotland, Washington rally, Religious Practice, centenarians, PETA, Lancet, famine, Intelligence, culture wars, Vatican, World Bank, elections, India, Chinese New Year, Gender-ratio, Death Rate, Underpopulaiton, British Royal Family, death rate, IVF, World Health Organisation, Waitangi Day, births, Youth, Poland, demographic winter, youth bulge, Steven Mosher, total fertility rate, Ethiopia, US, Italy, New Zealand, Adoption, Oxfam, Family taxation, fertility rate, Japan earthquake,