October
10th
  9:36:57 PM

Latin Americans increasing force in U.S.

Will Latin American voters soon have a significant say in how one the world’s most powerful countries is run?  The changing demography of many American states suggests that the answer could be yes and that Latin American voters are a growing force to contend with.  A record 23.7 million Latinos are eligible to vote in the 2012 presidential election, according to an analysis of Census Bureau data by the Pew Research Center.   

The Guardian reports that the country's growing Latino population is projected to be almost a third of the US population by 2050, having already tripled since 1986.  However, at least at the moment, they appear not to be using their potential for greater power.  Less than a third of Latino eligible voters actually voted in 2010 compared with almost half of all white people and 44% of black Americans.

Latinos in America are a mixed bunch; some with full US citizenship and others transient in occupations such as fruit picking.  However, it is clear that going forward the real punch will come from the young American born Latin American population – with slowly more and more passing the age of 18.  Every year about 600,000 American Latinos with full voting rights turn 18, and currently more than a third of the Latino population are still under the age of 18.

So what do Latinos in America want?  What are their moral standpoints and their views on the economy?  While residency issues are currently a hot topic, I don’t think we can assume that all Latin American voters have the same opinions as a voting block.

The Pew Research Centre report casts little light on these issues.  However, it clear that the Latino electorate is demographically different from other groups of eligible voters.  For one, it is much younger with 32% younger than 30.   At least according to the Young Democrats of America (hmmm a biased source?!), young African-Americans and young Hispanics are particularly inclined to support Democrats, with the economy high among young voters concerns.  I imagine that unemployment and jobs top the list this year at least for young voters.  An article in the New Scientist last month concludes that the "wealthy, ageing white population of America must be prepared to invest in young Hispanics" to protect their "golden future" due to the current economic disparity.  It will be interesting going forward to see how the increasing Latino population affects, or even sways, American politics.

 



to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Japan - Where did the children go?
22 May 2013
Migrants set to become majority in UK
22 May 2013
A shortage of women workers in China pushes up wages
20 May 2013
Chinese Author Ma Jian and the One-Child Policy
17 May 2013
Bugs for Breakfast anyone?
15 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | Feb 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

The Boy Scouts cave in
24 May 2013
Under enormous pressure, they have voted to welcome openly gay scouts. What message does the change in policy send young…

A boy’s life with unisex scouts
23 May 2013
The Boy Scouts of America will vote today on whether they will admit homosexual scouts. Will they become the Unisex…

Necessary excuses
23 May 2013
“Comfort women”, carpet bombing, atom bombs, lethal drones and genocide can all be justified by appeals to necessity.

Digital multitasking: scourge or blessing?
22 May 2013
How can we teach students to focus on what they ought to be doing?

Who or what is a “child”?
22 May 2013
Canada's Parliament lacks the courage to take a stand on defining when an unborn child will be protected by the…


 Tags
Paelstine, Jersey, son preference, Hungary, The Rhema Project, ageing, elderly, antibiotics, 2012 elections, US, Republican presidential candidate, South Africa, Italy, productivity, Demographic conference, Hong Kong, United Kingdom, centenarian, Poland, recession, Pakistan, Internet use, Disabilities, Economy, pro-natalism, Biggy Hall, Elderly, demography, disease, Overpopulation, Statistics, Anglican Church, Israel, Maternity Care, health policy, Down syndrome, sustainability, Gore, culture wars, Save the Children, Olympics, baby, Bulgaria, East Timor, ageing population, WHO, Population Research Institute, pension plans, Ted Turner, egg donors, election, sustainable development, Russia, Birth Control, EU, wife-sharing, BRICs, birthrate, aging, mortality rate, New Zealand, Rugby, Elderly care, Romania, disasters, birth rate, Roe v. Wade, sex selective abortions, Al Gore, European Union, Twins, Latvia, Children, Scotland, UK, humanism, contraceptives, modernity, internet, Somalia, Ban Ki-moon, Wilmoth, Korea, ITU, Lithuania, Waitangi Day, African Americans, materialism, human rights, Mo Yan, Sweden, food security, Francois Hollande, Ma Jian, Auckland, Medicaid, Law, Middle East, famine, Jonathan Sacks, fertitily,