January
10th
  8:12:15 PM

The real reason for Putin’s US adoption ban?

orphans

Russian President Vladimir Putin upset a lot of Americans with his December 28 (feast of the Holy Innocents) ban on adoptions to the US -- at the same time ordering his government to take a range of steps to make it easier for Russians to adopt orphans.  The law took effect effect Jan. 1, leaving in legal limbo about 50 children who were in the final phases of adoption.

Why? Putin and officials have cited the deaths of 19 Russian children adopted in the United States in the past 13 years (that's out of about 45,000), but it is also widely seen as retaliation at another level. The Wall Street Journal says:

The adoption ban was included in a package of measures the Kremlin pushed through parliament to retaliate for a new U.S. law aimed at punishing alleged Russian human-rights violators. That law was named for Sergei Magnitsky, a lawyer who died in prison after exposing what he said was a $230 million fraud perpetrated by senior Russian police officials. Russian officials insist his death was an accident.

But there's yet another possibility: demography. Comments Paul Kengor on Catholic Exchange:

The reality is that Russia continues to hemorrhage population. Russia’s population is projected to plummet from 140 million to 104 million by 2050. And what are the chief causal factors? There are several, but the two biggest are abortion and contraception—which occur at astonishingly high levels. Putin has tried to reverse both.

Abortion has wreaked havoc on Russia since the Bolsheviks legalized it a century ago. Soviet communists were way ahead of American liberals. By the 1970s, when abortion was legalized in America, the Soviet Union was already witnessing a staggering 7.2 million abortions per year.

The Cold War ended in the 1990s, but Russia’s runaway rates of abortion—as well as contraception—did not.

In response, Vladimir Putin has implemented the first restrictions on abortion in Russia in almost 50 years, limiting abortions to within 12 weeks. He even initiated a National Fertility Day.

Unfortunately, none of this has really worked.

Of course, the best place for children to be is with their own parents, or with adoptive parents in their own country and culture -- all other things being equal. But all other things are not; there are not many adoptive parents available in Russia. There were an estimated 700,000 orphans in 2010, and orphanages are often overcrowded.

One thing is certain: children should not be made pawns in any political or even demographic game.

 



to make a comment, click here

This article is published by Carolyn Moynihan and MercatorNet.com under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
White Deaths Outnumber Births in America
19 Jun 2013
A Sign of Things to Come?
18 Jun 2013
Chinese “Bride Price”
12 Jun 2013
Jobless Crisis for Youth
10 Jun 2013
Baby Boomers: An emerging resource?
7 Jun 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Jun 2013 | May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Squatters on Europe’s Christian heritage
19 Jun 2013
Can human dignity find a firm foundation in secularism?

Networks of responsibility: the Philadelphia building collapse
18 Jun 2013
Who should ultimately take the blame in a tragedy of careless demolition which caused six deaths?

“Man of Steel”
18 Jun 2013
Finally we have an excellent adaptation of everyone's favourite comic book hero.

What really happens to women who have abortions?
18 Jun 2013
Once again, the New York Times ignores the evidence and backs supporters of abortion.

“But if I am only for myself, what am I?”
17 Jun 2013
Canadian columnist Barbara Kay reflects on her upbringing and the issues that have made her a major controversialist.


 Tags
Infant Mortality, Carbon Credits, Colombia, homosexuality, mothers, Waitangi Day, Demographic Summit, birth rates, sex selective abortions, Muslim-Christian demography, Ehrlich, Jonathan Sacks, Indonesia, internet, Romney campaign, Australia, Birth Defects, Malaysia, Brazil, Rugby World Cup, humanism, robotics, Uganda, Technology, child restriction policy, Inheritance, disability, bride shortage, Demographic conference, Spain, Hungary, Islam, Poland, psychology, overpopulation, Jonathan Last, immigration, unemployment, climate change, Orthodox Church, Rome, one-child policy, Parental Happiness, Sir David Attenborough, adoption, sex selective abortion, increasing birth rates, Gender-ratio, pollution, Sterilisation, Population Growth, Christmas, presidential election, marriage, Minority Groups, economics, Underpopulaiton, Canna, workforce, Famine, Youth, Cuba, Belgium, PETA, UK, working class, Bangladesh, ageing, Malthus, pensions, 2012 elections, Mo Yan, Demographic Intelligence, subsidy, Uzbekistan, Philippines, children, military, Scotland, Population Association of America, labour market, health policy, human rights, Al Gore, Muslims, Auckland, food supply, poverty, Fertility, Easter, old age, Anglican Church, Zimbabwe, demographic winter, Simon Ross, enterprise, East Timor, Vatican, recession, Russia,