September
11th
  9:24:04 AM

USA is slowly having more children

According to USA Today, there are some signs of increasing confidence in America. That is because the US Fertility Forecast report released by Demographic Intelligence has shown an upward tick. It has moved from a 25 year low of 1.89 children per woman to an almost 25 year low of 1.90 children per women! Obviously, the confidence is only increasing slowly...

 In the wake of the “Great Recession” (I didn’t know that we were calling it that already...) the fertility rate in the US dropped as people lost confidence in the economic future of the country and the world:

“The fertility rate ‘says something about people's optimism for the future — their optimism about their economic circumstances,’ says demographer Mark Mather of the not-for-profit Population Reference Bureau in Washington, D.C.

"Historically, we've seen fertility trends move up and down with economic indicators," Mather says. "During the Great Depression, we saw fertility rates drop. We saw it again during the Great Recession.

‘It is quite possible that we'll see a bump in the fertility rate since the economy is improving and people are feeling better about jobs,’ Mather says. ‘The bigger question is, Will that be sustained in the long run?'"

I would have thought the bigger question is: is there are bump at all? Or is this just a statistical anomaly – I mean, we’re talking of an increase in fertility rates of around 0.5% here...and still the US is around 10% below the rate considered necessary for natural stability in a population: 2.1 children per woman.  So even if there has been a small uptick the USA is still relying on immigration to maintain a steady population. 

What is also interesting is the report’s conclusion that those who are regular attendees at religious services have a higher Total Fertility Rate than those who are not regular attendees:

“’Much of the downturn in births is related to economic factors, but economic factors do not affect the fertility decisions of all parents or future parents,’ Sturgeon says. ‘We started to wonder about various groups that might make fertility decisions based on other factors, and religious persons seemed to be a natural group, so we explored this with the data,’ he adds.

Among women aged 15-44, those who attend religious services weekly or more have 1.42 children, compared with the 1.11 children of women who rarely or never attend.

Women who attend religious services weekly intend to have 2.62 children, and those who rarely or never go want to have 2.10 children.

‘Partly because religious communities provide a family-friendly context to the women who attend them, religious women are more likely to have children and to bear a comparatively high share of the nation's children, compared to their less religious or secular peers,’ Sturgeon says.”

I wonder what Sturgeon means by a “family-friendly context” in religious communities? Is it that those sorts of communities are more likely to look upon children as unmitigated blessings rather that a cost or hindrance? Or is it that there is more support in such communities for the raising of children? Or is it that such communities are more likely to be positive and optimistic about the future and therefore more willing to bring children into the world? What are your thoughts?



to make a comment, click here

This article is published by Marcus Roberts and MercatorNet.com under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Russia: Growing and More Assertive
14 Apr 2014
Japan’s Shrinking Role in the World
8 Apr 2014
Why you shouldn’t take alarmist population predictions seriously
6 Apr 2014
Is Single Occupancy Vandalising the Environment?
4 Apr 2014
Worldwide migration: a constant factor
1 Apr 2014

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Apr 2014 | Mar 2014 | Feb 2014 | Jan 2014 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Is “conscious uncoupling” really such a loopy idea?
15 Apr 2014
Gwyneth Paltrow was ridiculed when she explained her divorce, but there's a nugget of truth in her words.

A deal with the devil
11 Apr 2014
Why did American officials refuse to prosecute Japanese doctors who had committed horrendous crimes in World War II?

“Is this the upshot of your experiment?”
10 Apr 2014
A Nathaniel Hawthorne tale of scientific obsession sheds light on today's designer children.

Protecting the first “little platoon”
10 Apr 2014
Society needs family values - but not the faith they are based on? Where a liberal proposal falls down.

US defence policy in the wake of the Ukrainian affair
10 Apr 2014
Rethinking American strategy in the framework of conventional war against enemies fighting on their own terrain.


 Tags
fertitily, Ireland, National Identity, declining fertility, subsidy, Singapore, Disabilities, female feticide, population control, slavery, internet, Gompertz law, Immigration, ITU, world population, human rights, Japan tsunami, Biggy Hall, growing population, Baby Bonus, taxation, materialism, United States, family, Older Mothers, population increase, Baby Boomers, genocide, Liechtenstein, The Rhema Project, predictions, Britain, media spin, demographic dividend, Population Association of America, Recession, US, human trafficking, Chen Guangcheng, Poverty, Minority Groups, Lithuania, centenarians, Asia, modernity, India, Ministry of Social Development, deaths, forecasts, extra-marital birth, Pope Francis, baby, Birth, Roger Short, Western Australia, Carbon Credits, society, insects, population projections, sex selection, marriage, Churchill, world hunger, polio, fertility rates, fertility, fatherhood, Christianity, men, Hong Kong, relationships, Fertility, workforce, Age, fertility rate, Latin America, workplace, demographics, University College London, Brain Drain, pension plans, Population Growth, Famine, Wilmoth, Inheritance, Moscow Demographic Summit 2011, jobs and economy, One Child Policy, food distribution, The Onion, depopulation, Apocalypse, centenarian, Christmas, homosexuality, population change, Law, Mortality, Auckland, European Union,
Follow MercatorNet
Facebook
Twitter
Newsletters
Sections and Blogs
Harambee
PopCorn
Conjugality
Careful!
Family Edge
Sheila Reports
Reading Matters
Demography Is Destiny
Bioedge
Conniptions (the editorial)
Connecting
Information
our ideals
our People
Mercator who?
partner sites
audited accounts
donate
New Media Foundation
Suite 212
75 Archer Street
Chatswood NSW 2067
Australia

editor@mercatornet.com
+61 2 9007 1187

© New Media Foundation 2014 | powered by Encyclomedia | designed by Elleston