April
02nd
  4:20:42 PM

Too much money spent on killer diseases and not enough on family planning, says expert

The international community is spending too much on diseases like AIDS and TB and not enough on family planning, a British expert on sexual and reproductive health told the annual conference of the UK’s Optimum Population Trust. Professor Judith Stephenson, of University College London, called for a global fund to invest in family planning, like the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. "People have taken their eye off the ball and think the job has been done. But there is a lot of unmet need for contraception, and this is highest in the poorest sections of society."

Oddly enough, there seems to have been little reaction to Professor Stephenson’s contention that world health leaders have raided the coffers of the fight on fertilty for funds to fight AIDS. Only a couple of weeks ago, the Pope was pilloried for expressing scepticism about the wisdom of funding AIDS campaigns.

The OPT’s conference produced a rich harvest of absurdity, self-justification, and self-contradiction. It was promoted with a startlingly insightful headline on the conference press release: "Sex drives world population growth". John Guillebaud, an Emeritus Professor of family planning and reproductive health at UCL, said that people engage in sex more often than they need for the babies they want. Therefore there must be a vast unmet need for contraception.

He used an unfortunate example to illustrate his point: Iran, where the average number of children fell from 5.5 to 2 in just 15 years. The local mullahs had endorsed edicts requiring all couples to learn about family planning before they marry.

He seems oblivious to Iran’s abyssmal track record on women’s rights. Writing in the London Times in early March, the Iranian woman who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2003, Shirin Ebadi, said

"The law looks disfavourably on Iranian women - literally with a male face. Since the 1979 Revolution Iranian women have been forbidden from serving as judges. In Iran a woman's evidence in court is worth half that of a man. Men can have multiple wives, while young girls can be married off to older men by their fathers. Sentences of stoning to death for adultery are still imposed, disproportionately on women, a practice denounced as grotesque and horrific by Amnesty International."

Has the OPT filled in the dots between human rights abuses, low status of women and wildly successful Iranian family planning programs? Apparently not.



to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
The Rhema Project
25 May 2012
A more religious future?
24 May 2012
Mexicans are no longer throwing themselves at the fence
18 May 2012
A New American Dream?
18 May 2012
Bollywood and gendercide in India
16 May 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | Feb 2012 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Sensing the sacred
25 May 2012
Is there a sense of the sacred that even the non-religious can share?

Could geoengineering save the planet?
25 May 2012
And who is thinking about the ethics of a technological quick fix?

A thought experiment about marriage
24 May 2012
A world in which sexual intimacy could not produce children would never have come up with the idea of marriage.

Australia’s lifeline: its precarious sea lanes
23 May 2012
Large, isolated and rich, Australia needs to cultivate a friendship with the US to survive in an dangerous world.

It’s only natural
22 May 2012
The bitterest debates today in the public square often turn on what is "natural". The Chinese sages had a lot…


 Tags
Religious Practice, China, debt, subsidy, population aging, fertility, spending, Baby Bonus, Congress, philanthropy, Hungary, Japan earthquake, Singapore, centenarian, family planning, births, Underpopulaiton, Pakistan, wages, satire, Canna, New York Times, New Zealand, 7 billion people, Demographic Summit, one-child policy, bride shortage, Uzbekistan, population decline, fertitily, IVF, Medicine, Canada, Minority Groups, Infant Mortality, aging population, Roe v. Wade, Islam, nursing homes, son preference, minorities, Adoption, Jonathan Sacks, Economics, Ehrlich, Roger Short, pension, Ministry of Social Development, Birth Rate, Sweden, family policy, Germany, Population Association of America, earthquake, Ethiopia, family, Fertility, Hong Kong, Gompertz law, US, Malthus, gender imbalance, demographic dividend, low fertility trap, Royal Family, Vietnam, overpopulation, religion, Paelstine, superannuation, culture wars, Prince Charles, UNFPA, Rick Santorum, homosexuality, climate change, Paul Ehrlich, overpopulation myth, retirement age, Housing, human rights, over-population, Europe, Lithuania, stock market, Demographic Intelligence, Population Centre, Death Rate, Asia, saving, Brazil, Famine, Population Research Institute, Steven Mosher, Economy, Belgium, unemployment, France, poverty, Washington rally,