April
05th
  12:42:01 PM

Too many at the dining table?

"It's a perfect storm," Professor John Beddington, the UK governments chief science advisor told the Sustainable Development UK 09 conference last month. "There's not going to be a complete collapse, but things will start getting really worrying if we don't tackle these problems. My main concern is what will happen internationally, there will be food and water shortages," he said. "We're relatively fortunate in the UK. There may not be shortages here, but we can expect prices of food and energy to rise." Prof Beddington said the "storm" would create war, unrest and mass migration. ~ London Telegraph, Mar 19

 One often hears in the debate about overpopulation that the world is finite and, if we do not slow down the rate of population growth or even reduce the world’s population we are going to run out of resources. This argument is based on the common experience of the effect of one more person than expected turning up for dinner: everyone has to get a bit less. Putting aside the fact that in the West the diners probably have too much to start with, is there any validity in the finiteness argument?

From a certain point of view the world is finite; it occupies a certain amount of space, it has a certain size and a certain volume. However, if the world was 100,000 times bigger than it is, it would still be finite but I am sure that everyone would agree that there would be little to worry about, at least for now. How do we know that with the current size of the planet we have something to worry about? People point to us running out of this or that mineral, this or that form of energy or running out of land or water. Very few minerals are wanted for their own sake. We do not want copper per se but rather the services provided by copper, for example, the transmission of electricity. If we found a cheaper and better replacement or a better way of recycling, copper would no longer be mined and no one would care how much or how little there is left in the ground. Fibre optical cables may well be that replacement. Those minerals that are wanted for their own sake, for example, gold and diamonds are often sought after precisely because they are scarce. No woman is going to thank the person who finds an unlimited supply of her ‘best friend’.

If there was a mineral that really was in finite supply and once it was used up that was it, would a growing population be a problem? Not necessarily. As the mineral was in limited supply it is going to be used up at some point no matter what the population is; it is just a matter of time. If that time is say 100 years hence then no one is going to worry for about 90 years; if it is going to run out 10 years hence then people will start trying to find alternatives. What matters is when this crucial last 10 years starts and not the total period until the mineral runs out. Only when the pressure is on do humans tend to focus on doing something, ask any writer with a deadline looming. Slowing down population growth may put off the day when something will have to be done but there is still an underlying assumption that human ingenuity will come to the rescue. And this is where the whole concept of finiteness comes unstuck. Human ingenuity has not yet proved to be finite and in fact the more people the more ingenuity and solutions there will be.

Dermot Grenham is an actuary  in London. His briefing paper on population is available with the other MercatorNet backgrounders. 



to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Are we ready for the “grey tsunami”?
22 Apr 2014
Iran leads Muslim countries in fertility decline
20 Apr 2014
Russia: Growing and More Assertive
14 Apr 2014
Japan’s Shrinking Role in the World
8 Apr 2014
Why you shouldn’t take alarmist population predictions seriously
6 Apr 2014

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Apr 2014 | Mar 2014 | Feb 2014 | Jan 2014 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Do you want CNN or ESPN with that burger?
15 Apr 2014
Why can't I talk with you in a restaurant? Why do I have to talk to the TV?

3 reasons not to trust the new climate report
15 Apr 2014
The latest report on climate change needs to be taken with a pinch of salt.

Is “conscious uncoupling” really such a loopy idea?
15 Apr 2014
Gwyneth Paltrow was ridiculed when she explained her divorce, but there's a nugget of truth in her words.

Losing our virtue
15 Apr 2014
Sex is supposedly too trivial to require virtue, yet so significant that restraint is an affront. It can't be both.

A deal with the devil
11 Apr 2014
Why did American officials refuse to prosecute Japanese doctors who had committed horrendous crimes in World War II?


 Tags
Technology, Phillipines, Iran, Medicine, Poverty, New Forests Company, Down syndrome, fertility treatment, Brazil, unemployment, Romania, population estimates, PETA, deaths, Al Gore, gendercide, sustainable development, Education, mothers, food wastage, Burma, births, birth rates, Asia, Japan tsunami, resources, childlessness, social unrest, human rights, Indonesia, children, Birth, The Onion, population control, Poland, Apocalypse, European Union, polio, Oxfam, Churchill, investment, families, food distribution, Lithuania, census, Obama administration , Hungary, Mo Yan, population bomb, Anglican Church, Old age, ITU, Minority Groups, Paul Ehrlich, Rome, family, declining fertility, Romney campaign, WHO, sex ratio, culture wars, disasters, Royal Family, IVF, pro-natalism, South Africa, one child policy, demography, old age, birth rate, loneliness, Educated women, egg donors, climate change, Latvia, International, family planning, Simon Ross, elections, grandchildren, Belgium, ageing, Parenting, Francois Hollande, Politics, Census, adoption, Population, taxation, integration, media, Law, East Timor, antibiotics, relationships, Zimbabwe, Baby Bonus, falling fertility, National Identity, Roger Short, populaiton growth,
Follow MercatorNet
Facebook
Twitter
Newsletters
Sections and Blogs
Harambee
PopCorn
Conjugality
Careful!
Family Edge
Sheila Reports
Reading Matters
Demography Is Destiny
Bioedge
Conniptions (the editorial)
Connecting
Information
our ideals
our People
Mercator who?
partner sites
audited accounts
donate
New Media Foundation
Suite 212
75 Archer Street
Chatswood NSW 2067
Australia

editor@mercatornet.com
+61 2 9007 1187

© New Media Foundation 2014 | powered by Encyclomedia | designed by Elleston