May
04th
  2:38:24 AM

Caring for ageing Canadians

Who is going to care for Canadian senior citizens in 20 years’ time? The changing ratio of elderly to children projected by Statistics Canada is sobering reading. Derek Miedema, of the Institute of Marriage and Family Canada, warns in a recent newsletter that the government has to begin preparing for a demographic winter now.

... by 2015, seniors will outnumber children in Canada. To put a finer point on it: in 2005 Statistics Canada estimated that there were 135 children per 100 seniors in Canada. In 2031, they estimate that there will be between 54 and 71 children per 100 seniors depending on how the population grows or declines between now and then.

The traditional structure of Canada’s population isn’t quite turned on it’s head, but it’s shoulders are getting sore.

The aging of Canada’s society hasn’t happened suddenly, or for one simple reason. Canadians are living longer; this will mean more people live longer past the age of 65. Families are choosing to have fewer children, and later in life. This means both fewer caregivers for our seniors and the eventual need for today’s children to juggle the needs of their own kids and their parents simultaneously.

The last time that Canadians reproduced themselves – a birthrate of 2.1 – was in 1971. Currently the birthrate is about 1.6. "An average of approximately 100,000 abortions per year since 2000 hasn’t helped matters," notes Miedma.

Nor will immigration help to rejuvenate the Canada’s demographic profile. According to James Bissett, former head of the Immigration Foreign Service, "No credible demographer believes the aging issue can be solved through immigration."

The great unanswered question is: how are we going to cope with massive numbers of elderly? "We know from current healthcare costs that the government alone cannot sustain the current level of care on the wages of fewer working citizens," says Miedma. So families and communities will have to share more of the burden.

It’s quite sensible. But who is working out the details of this huge social change. Will the single child of aged parents be able to cope? Willing to cope? Will ambitious young workers cheerfully pay more tax to care for other people’s parents? Canada is hardly the only country to face this problem. But the response of governmetns is beginning to look like the post-invasion planning for the Iraq War. ~ Institute of Marriage and Family Canada; hat tip to Jennifer Roback Morse


to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Oh Canada!
10 Feb 2012
US Centenarians - Not as Common as Once Thought
8 Feb 2012
Auckland -1.5 million strong
7 Feb 2012
A New UN Report on our Impending Overpopulation
1 Feb 2012
Japanese Earthquakes -  Natural and Demographic
31 Jan 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Feb 2012 | Jan 2012 | Dec 2011 | Nov 2011 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

How hedonism became America’s official religion
9 Feb 2012
An edict from the Obama administration has ended the American experiment in religious liberty.

Bombs across the border
10 Feb 2012
The US makes a strong case that its military interventions in Pakistan are just and legal. Whether they’re good is…

A parental defence of highly effective nagging
10 Feb 2012
When a deadly habit becomes a useful tool in the parental armoury.

Lost in Transition III: A collective challenge
9 Feb 2012
Who is to blame for the moral ignorance of young adults, and what is to be done?

Pink Lego
8 Feb 2012
Why are feminists throwing their toys out of the cot over a victory for girl power?


 Tags
Belgium, birth rates, Gender-ratio, Gender Imbalance, Brad Wilcox, labour market, shortages, sex selection, austria, spending, World Bank, Ehrlich, happiness, abortion, Auckland, utilitarianism, status of women, population aging, Latvia, one child policy, Russia, total fertility rate, unemployment, Norman Borlaug, election, Sweden, Government spending, Sterilisation, Birth Rate, China, Baby Bonus, subsidy, population, Republican presidential candidate, Politics, Census, environment, populaiton growth, Portugal, Brazil, religion, Feminism, youth bulge, Carbon Credits, Infant Mortality, abortions, Malthus, pro-natalism, Nigeria, Canada, sex, children, Abortion, Christianity, democracy, fertility, nursing homes, workforce, Japan earthquake, Paelstine, climate change, grandchildren, Mothers, Vatican, UNICEF, Denmark, family, Viagra, aging population, Orthodox Church, superannuation, population growth, population change, homosexuality, Copenhagen, birth rate, Lithuania, Japan tsunami, New Zealand, one-child policy, Washington rally, Japan, Population Centre, Fertility, Law, debt, sex ratio, Old age, IVF, Zimbabwe, Asia, sex selective abortion, Bulgaria, Nature magazine, Italy, USA, Rick Santorum, Ireland, Adoption, saving, South Africa,