November
12th
  8:49:14 PM

A breathless moment in the history of reproductive rights

The population control lobby is far from dead. There still are highly influential academics who fervently believe that increasing aid for population control (aka reproductive rights, women’s health, safe and legal abortion) is absolutely necessary. Without it, the world will turn into an over-heated, war-torn slum heaped with festering mountains of garbage. This is the message that comes through loud and clear in a special issue of an influential British journal, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, called The Impact of Population Growth on Tomorrow’s World. The special forum was edited by an Australian, Roger V. Short, and an American, Malcolm Potts. (The editorials are free, but a subscription is required to access the articles.)

Roger Short has been pushing population control remorselessly for decades. In this issue of the journal, his contributors quarry an inexhaustible mine of demographic clichés. In his words:

World experts, in a wide range of disciplines, explore the ways in which the inexorable increase in human numbers is exhausting conventional energy supplies, accelerating environmental pollution and Global Warming, and providing an increasing number of Failed States where civil unrest prevails. Few can be left in any doubt that calling a halt to future population growth in both developed and developing countries is the greatest challenge now facing our world.

Professor Short is a reproductive biologist but he has a genius for weaving a story out of capitalised platitudes: Global Warming, the Anthropocene, the Global Economy, the Revenge of Gaia, women’s Freedom from the Tyranny of Excessive Fertility, the God Gene, the Selfish Gene and so on.

Anyhow, amongst the Malthusian yadda-yadda, I found this stunning anecdote, which left me breathless. I think it even left Professor Short breathless, although it is hard to tell whether he regarded it as a success or failure of reproductive freedom:

I will never forget going to Skopje, in what was then Yugoslavia, in the mid 1970s to look at family-planning methods. When I asked Prof. Antonovski what contraceptives Macedonian women used, he told me that the hospital preferred abortion to contraception—it was more profitable. When I asked him the largest number of vacuum abortions he had ever performed on one woman in her lifetime, he paused for a moment and then replied ‘Sixty’. Incredulous, I asked him how that was possible. He said it was easy—you only needed to do four a year starting at about the age of 16, and it did not take very long to get to 60.



to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
The Rhema Project
25 May 2012
A more religious future?
24 May 2012
Mexicans are no longer throwing themselves at the fence
18 May 2012
A New American Dream?
18 May 2012
Bollywood and gendercide in India
16 May 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | Feb 2012 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Sensing the sacred
25 May 2012
Is there a sense of the sacred that even the non-religious can share?

Could geoengineering save the planet?
25 May 2012
And who is thinking about the ethics of a technological quick fix?

A thought experiment about marriage
24 May 2012
A world in which sexual intimacy could not produce children would never have come up with the idea of marriage.

Australia’s lifeline: its precarious sea lanes
23 May 2012
Large, isolated and rich, Australia needs to cultivate a friendship with the US to survive in an dangerous world.

It’s only natural
22 May 2012
The bitterest debates today in the public square often turn on what is "natural". The Chinese sages had a lot…


 Tags
videos, overpopulation, one-child policy, population aging, son preference, development, birth rate, UK, Uzbekistan, overpopulation myth, pension plans, status of women, family policy, demographic decline, Pension, United Nations, Youth, happiness, immigration, UNFPA, ageing, environment, European Union, population change, World Health Organisation, Disabilities, Twins, Chian, abortions, YouTube, New Zealand, France, population decline, retirement age, Anglican Church, labor shortages, elderly, Somalia, population control, Gore, birth rates, centenarian, Sweden, Baby Bonus, saving, family planning, census, healthcare, Nicholas Eberstadt, Guardian, ageing population, Law, Politics, Census, nursing homes, satire, Population Association of America, Orthodox Church, secularism, Famine, Canna, Dementia, GDP, Ireland, Nature magazine, Africa, Brad Wilcox, Birth, Middle East, Roger Short, Viagra, minorities, PETA, Crime, World Bank, population, wealth, Feminism, Congress, Rick Santorum, over-population, Demographic Summit, propaganda, sustainable development, Adoption, Rugby World Cup, Ehrlich, Hispanic, Apocalypse, contraception, Birth Rate, economy, election, Asia, Germany, Royal Family, UN, Census, French-Canadians, population growth, Brazil,