November
12th
  8:49:14 PM

A breathless moment in the history of reproductive rights

The population control lobby is far from dead. There still are highly influential academics who fervently believe that increasing aid for population control (aka reproductive rights, women’s health, safe and legal abortion) is absolutely necessary. Without it, the world will turn into an over-heated, war-torn slum heaped with festering mountains of garbage. This is the message that comes through loud and clear in a special issue of an influential British journal, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, called The Impact of Population Growth on Tomorrow’s World. The special forum was edited by an Australian, Roger V. Short, and an American, Malcolm Potts. (The editorials are free, but a subscription is required to access the articles.)

Roger Short has been pushing population control remorselessly for decades. In this issue of the journal, his contributors quarry an inexhaustible mine of demographic clichés. In his words:

World experts, in a wide range of disciplines, explore the ways in which the inexorable increase in human numbers is exhausting conventional energy supplies, accelerating environmental pollution and Global Warming, and providing an increasing number of Failed States where civil unrest prevails. Few can be left in any doubt that calling a halt to future population growth in both developed and developing countries is the greatest challenge now facing our world.

Professor Short is a reproductive biologist but he has a genius for weaving a story out of capitalised platitudes: Global Warming, the Anthropocene, the Global Economy, the Revenge of Gaia, women’s Freedom from the Tyranny of Excessive Fertility, the God Gene, the Selfish Gene and so on.

Anyhow, amongst the Malthusian yadda-yadda, I found this stunning anecdote, which left me breathless. I think it even left Professor Short breathless, although it is hard to tell whether he regarded it as a success or failure of reproductive freedom:

I will never forget going to Skopje, in what was then Yugoslavia, in the mid 1970s to look at family-planning methods. When I asked Prof. Antonovski what contraceptives Macedonian women used, he told me that the hospital preferred abortion to contraception—it was more profitable. When I asked him the largest number of vacuum abortions he had ever performed on one woman in her lifetime, he paused for a moment and then replied ‘Sixty’. Incredulous, I asked him how that was possible. He said it was easy—you only needed to do four a year starting at about the age of 16, and it did not take very long to get to 60.


to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Oh Canada!
10 Feb 2012
US Centenarians - Not as Common as Once Thought
8 Feb 2012
Auckland -1.5 million strong
7 Feb 2012
A New UN Report on our Impending Overpopulation
1 Feb 2012
Japanese Earthquakes -  Natural and Demographic
31 Jan 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Feb 2012 | Jan 2012 | Dec 2011 | Nov 2011 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

How hedonism became America’s official religion
9 Feb 2012
An edict from the Obama administration has ended the American experiment in religious liberty.

Bombs across the border
10 Feb 2012
The US makes a strong case that its military interventions in Pakistan are just and legal. Whether they’re good is…

A parental defence of highly effective nagging
10 Feb 2012
When a deadly habit becomes a useful tool in the parental armoury.

Lost in Transition III: A collective challenge
9 Feb 2012
Who is to blame for the moral ignorance of young adults, and what is to be done?

Pink Lego
8 Feb 2012
Why are feminists throwing their toys out of the cot over a victory for girl power?


 Tags
Belfast, Viagra, pension plans, son preference, West Virginia, labour market, population growth, aging, poverty, security, PETA, Australia, total fertility rate, Gender-ratio, Retirement, Germany, Hispanic, elderly, population bomb, abortions, Carbon Credits, Baby Bonus, Demographic Summit, Internet use, bride shortage, Population Centre, Mothers, France, subsidy, ageing population, Children, Detroit, Canada, Nature magazine, Pakistan, India, Demographic Intelligence, Law, over-population, Disabilities, HIV, materialism, Bangladesh, food production, Lithuania, Famine, family policy, life expectancy, March for Life, Prince Charles, Singapore, sex selective abortion, demographic dividend, pension, population control, spending, Russia, Sterialisation, videos, labor shortages, population change, Birth Rate, Apocalypse, sex selection, Middle East, nursing homes, Islam, Uganda, one child policy, Save the Children Fund, demographic decline, environment, China, Hungary, population aging, Adoption, utilitarianism, saving, immigration, happiness, sterilisation, birthrates, Abortion, Feminism, Roger Short, WHO, debt, South Africa, Somalia, low fertility trap, USA, Auckland, Vietnam, Ageing, gender imbalance, Japan, United Nations, climate change, Latvia, Twins,