January
05th
  9:12:20 AM

John Lennon on the population bomb

Arguments from authority are very weak indeed, but when the authority is John Lennon, what the heck.

Check out this brief clip from an undated interview with Lennon and Yoko Ono on the Dick Cavett show.

Someone in the audience asks Yoko Ono about over-population and she expresses her scepticism. Then Lennon chips in, “I don’t really believe it… I think we’ve got enough food and money to feed everybody… There’s enough room for us and some of us can go to the Moon anyway.”

“I think you’re wrong about that,” says Cavett.

“Oh, I don’t care,” Lennon responds. It seems that he thinks that the population bomb was a beat-up by the government to distract the public from really important issues like Vietnam and Northern Ireland. 

It doesn’t prove anything, I suppose, but at least I’m in good company. ~ HT to John Smeaton.



to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
The Rhema Project
25 May 2012
A more religious future?
24 May 2012
Mexicans are no longer throwing themselves at the fence
18 May 2012
A New American Dream?
18 May 2012
Bollywood and gendercide in India
16 May 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | Feb 2012 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Sensing the sacred
25 May 2012
Is there a sense of the sacred that even the non-religious can share?

Could geoengineering save the planet?
25 May 2012
And who is thinking about the ethics of a technological quick fix?

A thought experiment about marriage
24 May 2012
A world in which sexual intimacy could not produce children would never have come up with the idea of marriage.

Australia’s lifeline: its precarious sea lanes
23 May 2012
Large, isolated and rich, Australia needs to cultivate a friendship with the US to survive in an dangerous world.

It’s only natural
22 May 2012
The bitterest debates today in the public square often turn on what is "natural". The Chinese sages had a lot…


 Tags
birth rates, Putin, Easter, pro-natalism, Brazil, New Zealand, Rugby, election, foetus, Philippines, Birth, Politics, Census, Famine, pension, March for Life, Gender-ratio, immigration, Brendan O'Neill, Retirement, Islam, Chen Guangcheng, pensions, demography, demographic decline, military, Demographic Intelligence, workforce, Jonathan Sacks, environment, Colombia, Ehrlich, minorities, materialism, YouTube, Hispanic, UK, Crime, Baby Bonus, falling fertility, Ministry of Social Development, Birth Rate, Middle East, Roger Short, Singapore, abortions, contraception, Beneficiaries, secularism, New York Times, US, marriage, Save the Children Fund, The Rhema Project, population growth, Internet use, overpopulation, Abortion, human rights, Africa, sex selection, Sweden, Korea, Japan earthquake, Belfast, Elderly, Optimum Population Trust, Zimbabwe, IVF, population change, Sterialisation, Royal Family, population bomb, gendercide, ageing, sex ratio, Vietnam, Hungary, population projections, Al Gore, WHO, GDP, Fertility, Republican presidential candidate, euthanasia, United States, Somalia, food production, demographic dividend, Disabilities, Birth Control, fertility rate, Ageing, Recession, Britain, working class, wealth, homosexuality, United Nations, stock market, sustainable development, population aging,