May
02nd
  4:07:45 PM

Putin Aims to Increase Russian Life Expectancy and Birth Rates

 

The Russian Prime Minister, Vladimir Putin, has promised the State Duma that he will invest in “demography projects”.  In a two and a half hour speech that many are claiming is a signal that he intends to reclaim the country’s presidency, Putin stated that:

"According to preliminary calculations, between 2011 and 2015 some 1.5 trillion roubles will be invested in demography projects…First, we expect the average life expectancy to reach 71 years. Second, we expect to increase the birth rate by 25 to 30 per cent in comparison to the 2006 birth rate."

1.5 trillion roubles apparently works out to be about £33 billion and shows the seriousness which Russia’s leaders are treating the demographic problems affecting that nation, problems that were highlighted by the early results of the 2010 census and have already been discussed on this blog.

It is interesting to note that 2006 is taken as the benchmark date where the birth rate increase will be measured from.  Why not take the recent census data as the starting point?  An answer may be found in the fact that according to the Population Reference Bureau’s 2006 Population Data Sheet, the Russian birth rate was around 10 births per 1000 people.  An increase of 25 - 30% on that number would take the birth rate to around 12.5 - 13 births per 1000 people.  And what do you know?  According to the latest census data, the current Russian birth rate is 12.6 births per 1000 people.  Thus, it seems that Prime Minister Putin’s target has been reached without a rouble being spent!  That is the mark of a successful politician – pick a target that has already been reached and then throw lots of money at it and then point to the fact that you’ve reached your target as proof that your policies work.  However, on the other hand at least the average life expectancy target of 71 years has not yet been reached according to the latest census.  So, what will the money be spent on?

“Under the plan, the government would build more affordable housing for families, promote a healthy lifestyle and stop the country's brain drain. Previous schemes have seen cash incentives given to parents with two or more children to be spent on housing and education…He promised to stem Russia's population decline by supporting young families and improving health care…”

Perhaps some of the money should be sent on ensuring that members of the Russian Government attend the first international demographic summit being held in June and organised by the World Congress of Families.  To sweeten the deal, the cost of sending delegates will not be very high at all – in fact they won’t even have to leave Moscow!

Of course, all of this means that Russia should be the case study par excellence for those seeking a reduction in the Earth’s population.  Want to reduce the number of human beings on this Earth? Just follow Russia’s lead.  But don’t be surprised when you see its leaders trying to drag it in the opposite demographic direction.

 



to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Chinese Author Ma Jian and the One-Child Policy
17 May 2013
Bugs for Breakfast anyone?
15 May 2013
Ageing Population = Lower Productivity Growth?
13 May 2013
Happy Mother’s Day!
8 May 2013
Volunteering in New Zealand
6 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | Feb 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

EU shows how to do a dodgy survey
16 May 2013
The EU's largest-ever survey of hate crimes and discrimination against LGBT people claims that they labour under a terrible burden.…

How legal euthanasia changed Belgium for ever
17 May 2013
The ideology of absolute self-determination has become sacred and unquestionable.

The fallacy of a happy, productive and ageing work force
17 May 2013
Glib answers will not conjure away the hard, cold fact that workers everywhere are getting older and older.

What is parenthood?
15 May 2013
In debates about the family, some social scientists are asserting the primacy of theory over facts. Is this science?

Reason and responsibility: the Rana Plaza collapse
13 May 2013
The Rana Plaza tragedy was an outcome of a corrupt system that is rotten to the core. Who should --…


 Tags
homosexuality, Ma Jian, Orthodox Church, nursing homes, Bangladesh, Carbon Credits, disability, Copenhagen, happiness, foetus, Sir David Attenborough, Youth, Melinda Gates, sex selective abortions, Muslim, Western Australia, human trafficking, human rights, Demographic Summit, population aging, antibiotics, spending, superannuation, Sterialisation, employment, centenarians, insects, psychology, Roger Short, WHO, gender imbalance, carbon emissions, Washington rally, Population, population density, US, youth bulge, UNICEF, secularism, Retirement, workforce, family policy, gendercide, ITU, Twins, Somalia, wages, Children, population ageing, obesity, adoption, Lithuania, careers, Ehrlich, fertility rates, Pope Benedict XVI, Sterilisation, Elderly, Vietnam, Famine, poverty, death rate, Muslim-Christian demography, workforce shortage, Falkland Islands, Prince Charles, volunteering, UK, food production, Urbanisation, falling fertility, pi, immigration reform, Underpopulaiton, Disabilities, bride shortage, marriage, pension, Anglican Church, Portugal, family structure, environment, Francois Hollande, Telegraph, Population reduction, Statistics, female feticide, Jonathan Sacks, Baby Bonus, United States, Olympics, Sweden, funding, ageing, Immigration, Wall Street Journal, overpopulation, Zimbabwe, investment, increasing birth rates,