3:19:50 PM

Gendercide Recognition

At the beginning of this month, Members of the US Congress, demographers and representatives from human rights organisations got together in Washington DC to  “launch an effort to end the gendercide of girls”.  The humanitarian organisation All Girls Allowed (its website is here) hosted a film showing and press conference, demographers presented research to Member of Congress showing the link between war and a “male youth bulge” (something we've covered on this blog here), while the economic, trade and currency valuation implications of such a gender imbalance in India and China were discussed.

The point of all of this was to “proclaim one truth that everyone agrees on: Gendercide – the systemic elimination of a particular gender – is wrong.”

I would hope that everyone agrees with that statement, especially when one remembers the worrying facts about China’s and India’s gender imbalances. In China the at-birth gender ratio of boys to girls has increased from 106:100 in 1979 to 120:100 today, largely as a result of the one-child policy. There are now 37 million more men than women in China according to government figures.  In India the problem is just as serious as cultural preferences for boys see both the abortion of female foetuses and the neglect and killing of baby girls that were lucky enough to survive the womb.

However, this is not just a problem in the world’s two most populous nations.   According to the book Unnatural Selection: Choosing Boys over Girls, and the Consequences of a World Full of Men, by Beijing-based journalist Mara Hvistendahl, this is a problem that extends throughout South and Central Asia and into the Caucuses.  Indeed, according to Hvistendahl, by now Asia as a whole is “missing” 163 million females – an immense number.

I would have thought that these numbers, these statistics and the mere fact that parents are killing their children on the basis of that child's sex (due to cultural, financial or governmental pressure) would be horrific enough to not need any further arguments to justify speaking out against it. That is why I thought it was a little sad that Chai Ling, the founder of All Girls Allowed felt that she had to include the following argument to bolster her case:

"It's important for world leaders to see gendercide is not just a women's rights issue, but it also leads to trade imbalance, insecurity and a threat to peace" .

I am sure that that is all true, but shouldn't the argument simply be: gendercide is wrong because female babies (born and unborn) are either being killed or left to die! Full stop. Quod erat demonstrandum. Surely world leaders should not then ask: "Yes, but what are the likely outcomes of this?" 

Some things are wrong not because of their consequences, but because they intrinsically are wrong. Gendercide is one of those things. Thus, gendercide will be wrong even if you think its consequences are good, perhaps because it is furthering China's one child policy and helping to curb China's (and the world's) population. If world leaders cannot see that, and will only agree that it is wrong because its consequences are undesirable, then that is a very worrying state of affairs indeed. 

to make a comment, click here

about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Russia: Growing and More Assertive
14 Apr 2014
Japan’s Shrinking Role in the World
8 Apr 2014
Why you shouldn’t take alarmist population predictions seriously
6 Apr 2014
Is Single Occupancy Vandalising the Environment?
4 Apr 2014
Worldwide migration: a constant factor
1 Apr 2014

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

Apr 2014 | Mar 2014 | Feb 2014 | Jan 2014 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

A deal with the devil
11 Apr 2014
Why did American officials refuse to prosecute Japanese doctors who had committed horrendous crimes in World War II?

“Is this the upshot of your experiment?”
10 Apr 2014
A Nathaniel Hawthorne tale of scientific obsession sheds light on today's designer children.

Protecting the first “little platoon”
10 Apr 2014
Society needs family values - but not the faith they are based on? Where a liberal proposal falls down.

US defence policy in the wake of the Ukrainian affair
10 Apr 2014
Rethinking American strategy in the framework of conventional war against enemies fighting on their own terrain.

Why schools deny that bullying causes suicide
8 Apr 2014
They can't afford to take responsibility for their failed policies.

research, Pope Francis, Ted Turner, China, Mortality, Beneficiaries, Muslim-Christian demography, Washington rally, Latvia, ageing population, satire, Happiness, demographic growth, son preference, Moscow Demographic Summit 2011, Anglican Church, risk, government subsidies, economic crisis, death, Retirement, 2012 elections, Ireland, consumers, falling birth rates, Fertility, Parental Happiness, employment, Chen Guangcheng, pollution, Brain Drain, gonorrhea, lifestyle, food supply, one child policy, Demographic conference, Baby boomers, falling fertility, childlessness, immigration, brain, Scotland, Medicaid, European Union, Work, growing population, ramadan, Phillipines, Birth Defects, Save the Children, insects, Hong Kong, humanism, Lithuania, Human Resources, wealth, Twins, March for Life, world hunger, Mining, euthanasia, migration, subsidy, population decline, Russia, values, global hunger, Paul Ehrlich, Muslims, utilitarianism, disasters, Vatican, youth bulge, Vladimir Putin, New Zealand, Rugby, West Virginia, overpopulation myth, Japan, deaths, Deaths, fatherhood, election, United Kingdom, environmentalism, Sweden, grandchildren, military, Italy, earthquake, debt, Rwanda, Viagra, internet, One child policy, Wilmoth, France, centenarian, New York Times, Africa, predictions,
Follow MercatorNet
Sections and Blogs
Family Edge
Sheila Reports
Reading Matters
Demography Is Destiny
Conniptions (the editorial)
our ideals
our People
Mercator who?
partner sites
audited accounts
New Media Foundation
Suite 212
75 Archer Street
Chatswood NSW 2067

+61 2 9007 1187

© New Media Foundation 2014 | powered by Encyclomedia | designed by Elleston