July
08th
  5:40:35 PM

The Future of Two Economic Powerhouses

 

Germany and China, the leading economies in their respective continents - Europe and Asia – share eerily similar demographic and economic outlooks.  A decline in future working generations and a corresponding increase in the number of economically dependent retirees are problems that are looking like they will cause future economic problems for both of these economic powerhouses.

In China, the country is about to undergo a demographic shift. The share of the population over the age of 60 is rising rapidly – that share will rise from 12.5% in 2010 to 20% in 2020 according to the Economist.  The absolute number of those over 60 will double by 2030 from the 178 million today.  At the other end of life, the number of primary-school enrolments has dropped from 25.3 million in 1995 to 16.7 million in 2008.  This means that China’s “demography dividend” (the availability of many young workers) is beginning to disappear.  In the future, couples with only one child may find themselves with four parents to look after (the 4-2-1 phenomenon).  China may be forced to rethink some of its policies in the not too distant future, including raising the retirement age.  The official retirement age has not changed since 1951 (60 for men, 50 for women, 55 for civil servants) when the Chinese life expectancy was 46 compared to 73 today.  However, changing this many not be easy:

“[w]hen French workers went on strike last year over plans to raise their retirement age, officials in China hastily denied reports that they were planning to do anything of the sort.”  

Another major change could be the lifting of the one child policy. However, merely revoking the one-child policy may not be enough. Mr Wang Feng of the Brooking Institute argues that couples choose to have small families because children are expensive. Removing the state ban on larger families may do little to change this attitude. And of course, there are many other examples around the world where countries are managing to keep their birth rates very low (below replacement levels) without state interference.

For example, in Germany, there is no equivalent one-child policy.  However, its birth rate is among the lowest in the EU at 1.36 children per woman.  This is leading to a rapidly ageing population that is not fully reproducing itself.  According to the Wall Street Journal

“[Germany’s] working-age population is shrinking by more than 100,000 people a year, raising fears that eventually there will be too many retirees and not enough working people to support them. Rural areas are feeling the effects already as Germany's labor shortage draws younger residents to bigger cities, where companies are fighting to attract skilled workers.”

The overall population of Germany has been predicted to shrink by 20% to 64.7 million people in 2060 according to government estimates.  The working-age population is predicted to shrink even faster, dropping 27% to 36 million by 2060.

The problem may be clear, but what are the solutions, if any? The Wall Street Journal mentions that the “tough immigration laws have helped prevent Germany from importing enough skilled labor to compensate” for its declining working population. This is perhaps one answer, but one that comes with the problems of integration/assimilation and social cohesion (or lack thereof). 

What about German’s having more babies?  According to Barbara Riedmüller, a political science professor at Freie Universtät in Berlin:

“the woman must always choose between her family and her career – there’s no both”.

In a similar vein, the mayor of the town of Kühnhausen (population 1,200 of whom a quarter are senior citizens), Ms Lindner, states that “in this day and age, having a family and career is not so easy.”

This issue is one that many countries will have to face up to – how can countries lift birth rates when a child is seen as the end of career advancement? Is there anything countries can do to help? Flexible working hours? Making crèches more readily available? Or are we going to have to accept that motherhood and career development necessarily conflict? If so, which one will win out?



to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Chinese Author Ma Jian and the One-Child Policy
17 May 2013
Bugs for Breakfast anyone?
15 May 2013
Ageing Population = Lower Productivity Growth?
13 May 2013
Happy Mother’s Day!
8 May 2013
Volunteering in New Zealand
6 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | Feb 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

EU shows how to do a dodgy survey
16 May 2013
The EU's largest-ever survey of hate crimes and discrimination against LGBT people claims that they labour under a terrible burden.…

How legal euthanasia changed Belgium for ever
17 May 2013
The ideology of absolute self-determination has become sacred and unquestionable.

The fallacy of a happy, productive and ageing work force
17 May 2013
Glib answers will not conjure away the hard, cold fact that workers everywhere are getting older and older.

What is parenthood?
15 May 2013
In debates about the family, some social scientists are asserting the primacy of theory over facts. Is this science?

Reason and responsibility: the Rana Plaza collapse
13 May 2013
The Rana Plaza tragedy was an outcome of a corrupt system that is rotten to the core. Who should --…


 Tags
elderly, European Union, Chian, Turkey, Latin America, life expectancy, Mexico, family structure, military, Brad Wilcox, children, ageing population, Washington rally, human rights, New Forests Company, Twins, The Rhema Project, Save the Children Fund, Demographic conference, famine, bride shortage, Ehrlich, Christianity, labour market, Baby Bonus, fertility rate, sex selection, Intelligence, pi, birth rate, Japan earthquake, gender imbalance, World Health Organisation, election, Poland, contraceptives, labor shortages, religion, Ma Jian, March for Life, climate change, human trafficking, Carbon Credits, British Royal Family, development, status of women, Ministry of Social Development, Denmark, Finland, Ethiopia, immigration reform, investment, population change, US, Italy, Israel, happiness, Population reduction, North Korea, family, Muslim-Christian demography, Demographic Summit, economic crisis, abortion, aid, antibiotics, Africa, Family taxation, low fertility trap, Waitangi Day, Philippines, Educated women, United States Elections, India, Biggy Hall, Moscow Demographic Summit 2011, Al Gore, mothers, Age, Replacement Rate, jobs and economy, UK, population control, Gore, American politics, Congress, Underpopulaiton, Singapore, youth bulge, Population, IVF, Diabetes, Sterialisation, unemployment, wages, Immigration, French-Canadians, International, centenarian, Down syndrome,