July
30th
  12:03:31 PM

Moves on the One Child Policy in China

 

There have been some noises coming out of China recently that the one child policy, introduced in 1979 to curb population growth, is on the way out. Maybe not right away, but soon.

First, from The Australian newspaper,  there is a story of an unnamed official from China’s most populous province, Guandong (in southern China).  This official is making it known that Guandong has asked Beijing to allow couples where just one parent is an only child to have a second baby.  I can understand the official’s reticence, but the fact that he or she is prepared to come out in the Western media to say such things perhaps gives an indication of the depth of feeling about this issue? After all, I can imagine that implicitly criticising a current communist government policy to the media is not the safest thing to do in China!

Secondly, in the China Daily, there is official acknowledgement from government officials that the Government’s emphasis is changing when it comes to population control. 

Perhaps the Chinese Government is starting to worry about the implications of a lack of an emerging workforce, as we have discussed earlier, and so are shifting the country’s family planning policy. According to Li Bin, minister of the National Population and Family Planning Commission, this:

“…will result in a greater focus on population management than on quantity control, to improve people's quality of life…”

This shift has been making news for a while now, and has been reported on this fine blog before. 

Zhao Baige, the vice-commissioner of Li Bin’s commission, described the on-going change in strategy as “significant” and “revolutionary”. 

"We have to innovate in both our population strategy and its implementation" to tackle such emerging problems as urbanization, an aging population and declining fertility rates, she said.

Of course, these problems are as a direct result of the Chinese state’s meddling in their people’s procreation in the first place.  This shift has also won the praise of the UN, with Nobuko Horibe, director of the United Nations Population Fund Asia and Pacific Regional Office, saying that the policy shift is necessary.

"It is in line with China's changing demographics and national interest. I think China is now ready for the shift.

"Everyone has the right to live and to realize their potential. It is the government's responsibility to provide the people with suitable conditions," Horibe said.

Apparently, this right to realise their potential does not include having as many children as you like, but only as many as the state will let you, but if that limit is going to be relaxed and increased that is at least a start...

Zhao’s commission has expanded services from just focussing on reproduction (and controlling/limiting it) to after-birth health, early child development and giving young people access to mental healthcare. Necessarily, care for the elderly is also being boosted as well as public services for marginalised groups, such as migrants and families left behind in rural areas. 

All this talk of shifting in emphasis is short on details and what this will mean for the average Chinese rights to determine the size of their family is unclear. Furthermore, any change will come about gradually as “the sheer size of the population will remain a key factor in the nation’s social and economic development”.  With time, the lack of children replacing those who are dying will mean that sheer size will cease to be the overriding concern for China’s government.

to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
The Rhema Project
25 May 2012
A more religious future?
24 May 2012
Mexicans are no longer throwing themselves at the fence
18 May 2012
A New American Dream?
18 May 2012
Bollywood and gendercide in India
16 May 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | Feb 2012 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Sensing the sacred
25 May 2012
Is there a sense of the sacred that even the non-religious can share?

Could geoengineering save the planet?
25 May 2012
And who is thinking about the ethics of a technological quick fix?

A thought experiment about marriage
24 May 2012
A world in which sexual intimacy could not produce children would never have come up with the idea of marriage.

Australia’s lifeline: its precarious sea lanes
23 May 2012
Large, isolated and rich, Australia needs to cultivate a friendship with the US to survive in an dangerous world.

It’s only natural
22 May 2012
The bitterest debates today in the public square often turn on what is "natural". The Chinese sages had a lot…


 Tags
Obesity, birth rate, Birth Rate, UN, life expectancy, pension, UNFPA, labor shortages, Baby Bonus, family policy, family, Youth, Moscow Demographic Summit 2011, funding, March for Life, demographic decline, Sterilisation, BRICs, Belfast, Ageing, populaiton growth, population control, Ehrlich, abortions, Brazil, over-population, materialism, Vietnam, Sweden, Nigeria, aging, World Health Organisation, West Virginia, gender imbalance, Rick Santorum, Politics, Census, Anglican Church, The Rhema Project, climate change, United Nations, Prince Charles, Christianity, unemployment, Economy, pensions, sterilisation, environment, 2012 election, Russia, Religious Practice, human rights, Lithuania, Japan tsunami, debt, aging population, Government spending, Roger Short, Christmas, Birth rates, Demographic conference, Hong Kong, HIV, youth bulge, Republican presidential candidate, Chinese New Year, Middle East, Asia, religion in public square, Chen Guangcheng, workforce shortage, Pakistan, African Americans, centenarians, grandchildren, Recession, democracy, Census, Internet use, The Economist, retirement age, Carbon Credits, Gender-ratio, New Zealand, female feticide, Paul Ehrlich, election, World Bank, New York Times, sex, old age, Oxfam, ageing population, total fertility rate, Apocalypse, son preference, population decline, pension plans, superannuation, family planning, sustainable development,