2:14:59 PM

Sterilisation in India


Recently the UK newspaper, the Independent, has published an article about the Jhunjhunu district of Rajasthan in India, where there is a statewide target to sterilise 1% of the population.  

Of course the state officials cannot do so through coercion - that would be too much like eugenics! And last time that India tried forced sterilisation it proved to be “deeply controversial”:

“…the country's efforts at confronting the issue have had mixed and often deeply controversial results. In the 1970s, Sanjay Gandhi, son of the then prime minister Indira Gandhi, oversaw a programme enacted during the State of Emergency in which unknown numbers of women were forced to be sterilised and men made to have vasectomies.”

Instead of forcing people to have sterilisation operations, officials at the national and the state level have turned to incentives:

“Technically, paying people to undergo the operations is illegal. But the Ministry of Health has established a scheme that pays those who have the procedure for "loss of earnings". A man receives 1,100 rupees (£15) while a woman pockets 600. Anyone who brings willing patients to the clinic – a so-called "motivator" – pockets 200 rupees.”

While this could perhaps be defended as removing a financial barrier for those who would wish to have the operation but cannot afford the time off work, it seems that at least some are having the operation in order to receive the money:

“Asked why his wife had the operation rather than him, he replied that he intended to return and have it done as well. When officials explained with a laugh why it was not necessary, he insisted: "I have the right to have it done and to collect the money."”

Rajasthan has also hit upon a new way to get around the problem that the number of people having sterilisation drop off during the monsoon months of July, August and September as many are too busy working in the fields and are concerned about “a perceived risk of infection during the damp, humid weather”.  This year, officials have decided to give all those who undergo the operation during the monsoon months a ticket for an upcoming raffle – prizes have been donated by a local university and include a Tata Nano car, motorbikes and electric food blenders.  Despite these prizes, the chief medical officer of the district, Sitaram Sharma is not sanguine about the 1% target being reached anytime soon:

"Last year around 10,000 people had the operation [in Juhnjhunnu district], but the target was 16,000. This year the target is 21,000 but I don't think we will reach it," he said.

Perhaps the only way to get there will be to re-introduce compulsory sterilisation...But who then would choose the 1%?

Before we get too high and mighty and start tut-tutting this terrible, gimmicky practice, over at Spiked, Patrick Hayes has written an interesting article drawing comparisons between the material incentives offered in Rajasthan and the moral pressure heaped upon us in the West. 

According to Hayes:

“…while the Indian government is effectively blackmailing people into sterilisation through cash payments and a chance to win a car, here in the West moral pressure is used to encourage us to stop having more kids. So if it’s not Population Matters’ ‘Stop at Two pledge’, urging us to take a ‘green step towards environmental survival for us all’ – and vocally condemning those such as the Beckhams who choose to have more than two kids – then it’s others warning of the way in which increased population growth will lead to lower living standards and ever scarcer energy and food.”

Hayes is firmly of the view that the scaremongering about population growth today is unfounded:

“Whether it is the Reverend Thomas Malthus’ predictions in the eighteenth century about impending famines, or Paul Ehrlich’s prophesises about hundreds of millions dying as a result of lack of resources in the 1970s, such miserable prognoses of population crises have never failed to be wrong. And for a good reason: they turn all socio-economic problems into demographic ones and neglect the socio-economic solutions, such as improved production techniques.”

He also makes the point about those arguing for population reduction – just what is the “optimum” level of human population? How do we reach that optimum level and why is it that number and not a few million more or less?  Or a few thousand more or less? Or even one human being more or less?  I will leave the last words to Hayes:

“Sad as it is to see healthy young women in India encouraged to sacrifice their fecundity to satisfy misplaced and arbitrary government targets, it isn’t so different to the moral pressure being heaped upon us Westerners to have smaller families. Instead of simply criticising the gimmicky nature of the Indian government’s scheme, we need instead to tackle the heart of the problem: the false, widespread belief that more people equals more problems, rather than more problem-solvers.”

to make a comment, click here

comments powered by Disqus
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Jewish births “Trending Upwards” in Israel
23 Jul 2014
New Zealand among most ethnically diverse countries
21 Jul 2014
Niue: A dying Island
17 Jul 2014
Japan faces pilot shortage
15 Jul 2014
Human Trafficking to China
13 Jul 2014

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

Jul 2014 | Jun 2014 | May 2014 | Apr 2014 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Reflections on an unforgiving day
18 Jul 2014
What links the twin tragedies of a downed plane over the Ukraine and Israel's invasion of Gaza?

Five steps Malaysia Airlines must take after its second disaster in four months
18 Jul 2014
Inaction could sink the company.

Why we all deserve free, yummy dark chocolate
18 Jul 2014
If Obamacare offers free contraceptives, why not free chocolate? It has health benefits, too.

Mothers in shackles
16 Jul 2014
It’s not only in Sudanese prisons that women give birth chained.

Celebrity swimmer Ian Thorpe comes out
15 Jul 2014
In a tell-all interview, one of Australia's most famous athletes admits that he is gay. Is he?

morocco, Oxfam, Auckland, overpopulation myth, workplace, Ageing, Beneficiaries, population growth, Crime, Malthus, bankruptcy, pi, Japan tsunami, UK, Medicaid, Falkland Islands, spending, The Economist, Population reduction, sustainability, Happiness, Jonathan Last, feminism, Disabilities, Age, climate change, Gates Foundation, demographic decline, Baby Boomers, Population Research Institute, world population, slums, total fertility rate, videos, EU elections, British Royal Family, Israel, American politics, National Identity, Chinese New Year, BRICs, government, Government spending, Phillipines, Africa, population, security, FIAMC, Save the Children, Viagra, Manny Pacquiao, Old age, Sir David Attenborough, Roe v. Wade, superbugs, Ehrlich, Sweden, India, Mexico, Mothers, New Zealand, Rugby, Catholic Church, overpopulation, modernity, children, subsidy, Educated women, US, status of women, Western Australia, skills shortage, immigration, Margaret Sanger, sex selective abortions, Trans Pacific Partnership, foetus, Nicholas Eberstadt, disease, Burma, Internet use, famine, Carbon Credits, bride shortage, New Zealand, USA, Bulgaria, increasing birth rates, declining fertility, Brazil, depopulation, Republican presidential candidate, fertility rate, history, election, Immigration, Lithuania, Royal Family, Elderly care, Simon Ross, France,
Follow MercatorNet
Sections and Blogs
Family Edge
Sheila Reports
Reading Matters
Demography Is Destiny
Conniptions (the editorial)
our ideals
our People
Mercator who?
partner sites
audited accounts
New Media Foundation
Suite 12A, Level 2
5 George Street
North Strathfield NSW 2137
+61 2 8005 8605
skype: mercatornet

© New Media Foundation 2014 | powered by Encyclomedia | designed by Elleston