October
05th
  3:59:08 PM

Seven Billion People

As I’m sure you are all aware,(and if not, see here) the world is set to welcome its seven billionth person this year. Or perhaps next year. Or perhaps it has already happened. Or maybe not. Anyway, the population is around the seven billion person mark and the comforting thought that the world’s population is around the six billion range has been disturbed. This has produced a fair amount of angst and some debate about how many more people the Earth can support in the future.  Are the population bomb predictions about to (finally) come true? As the Financial Times comments:

“…the central concerns still revolve around the earth’s human “carrying capacity”. How many people can live sustainably on this planet? Can we feed a global population that is growing by 76m per year and will exceed 9bn by 2050, according to median demographic estimates? And will the growing human burden on the earth eventually cause catastrophic and irreversible environmental damage, from climate change to mass extinction of wildlife?”

The FT piece is very interesting and has some very interesting graphs and figures that are bright, colourful, interactive AND informative – a compelling combination!  The report even highlights that there is another side to this debate apart from the inevitable “there are too many people therefore we must do something about it, how about people (usually poorer than ourselves) do something about it and have less kids” spiel that dominates the news reports:

“Estimates of human carrying capacity range from a billion to a trillion people,” says Joel Cohen, head of the Laboratory of Populations at Rockefeller University, New York. “Those numbers are really political numbers rather than scientific numbers, designed to support a particular viewpoint.”

Please go have a look at the article, which, as I say, is very interesting and informative.  The one downside about it is that it doesn’t mention the population decline that many countries are going through currently or the estimated world population decline that is one of the possibilities that the UN has estimated by 2100.  Nor does it mention that while the numbers are increasing of people in the world are increasing seemingly at an increasing rate, this is masking a drastic slowing down of the rate of population growth.  For an alternative view, take a couple of minutes to have a look at this interesting and easy to follow video from the Population Research Institute:

Welcome baby number 7 billion, whoever you are! I, for one, am glad you are here.



to make a comment, click here


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Chinese Author Ma Jian and the One-Child Policy
17 May 2013
Bugs for Breakfast anyone?
15 May 2013
Ageing Population = Lower Productivity Growth?
13 May 2013
Happy Mother’s Day!
8 May 2013
Volunteering in New Zealand
6 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | Feb 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

EU shows how to do a dodgy survey
16 May 2013
The EU's largest-ever survey of hate crimes and discrimination against LGBT people claims that they labour under a terrible burden.…

How legal euthanasia changed Belgium for ever
17 May 2013
The ideology of absolute self-determination has become sacred and unquestionable.

The fallacy of a happy, productive and ageing work force
17 May 2013
Glib answers will not conjure away the hard, cold fact that workers everywhere are getting older and older.

What is parenthood?
15 May 2013
In debates about the family, some social scientists are asserting the primacy of theory over facts. Is this science?

Reason and responsibility: the Rana Plaza collapse
13 May 2013
The Rana Plaza tragedy was an outcome of a corrupt system that is rotten to the core. Who should --…


 Tags
urban population, Paelstine, business, Auckland, Catholic Church, Belfast, foetus, one-child policy, Latin America, Belgium, Sir Andrew Green, fertility rate, IVF, Oxfam, youth bulge, East Timor, old age, New York Times, workforce shortage, aging population, death rate, European Union, Demographic conference, British Royal Family, Carbon Credits, family structure, Melinda Gates, materialism, unemployment, Biggy Hall, adoption, Underpopulaiton, science, Poverty, centenarian, investment, Washington rally, Copenhagen, psychology, American politics, volunteering, female feticide, contraception, Optimum Population Trust, UNFPA, Intelligence, International, Indonesia, Vietnam, malthus, jobs and economy, recession, African Americans, Easter, falling fertility, Lancet, migration, demographics, human trafficking, population ageing, Infant Mortality, minorities, EU, superbugs, disease, Population, superannuation, South Africa, population growth, wealth, India, gonorrhea, Spain, World Health Organisation, Switzerland, Middle East, Rugby World Cup, Europe, Medicine, Twins, loneliness, Baby Roberts, ANZAC Day, Uzbekistan, Hispanic, Olympics, baby, France, Mexico, Orthodox Church, Guardian, abortion, Baby Boomers, Inheritance, Ageing, YouTube, Population reduction, Urbanisation, austria, PETA,