August
27th
  4:45:49 PM

Europe’s demographic and cultural time bomb

Photo: Guardian /Christopher ThomondIn Brussels, the top seven boys names recently were Mohamed, Adam, Rayan, Ayoub, Mehdi, Amine and Hamza. Mohamed is also the most popular name in Holland’s four biggest cities. Is anyone surprised?

Perhaps not, but a recent London Telegraph article suggests, with a certain note of alarm, that a “Muslim Europe” is emerging while policy-makers refuse to discuss the potential problems of this “demographic time bomb”. It reminds one a bit of Inspector Clouseau avowing, “It is not my Behm.”

Adrian Michaels writes that “a recent rush into the EU by migrants, including millions of Muslims, will change the continent beyond recognition over the next two decades…

The numbers are startling. Only 3.2 per cent of Spain's population was foreign-born in 1998. In 2007 it was 13.4 per cent. Europe's Muslim population has more than doubled in the past 30 years and will have doubled again by 2015…

Europe's low white birth rate, coupled with faster multiplying migrants, will change fundamentally what we take to mean by European culture and society. The altered population mix has far-reaching implications for education, housing, welfare, labour, the arts and everything in between. It could have a critical impact on foreign policy: a study was submitted to the US Air Force on how America's relationship with Europe might evolve. Yet EU officials admit that these issues are not receiving the attention they deserve.

The pace of immigration has stepped up since 2002, says an EU report, with net migration into the EU roughly tripling to between 1.6 million and two million people per year.

The increased pace has made a nonsense of previous forecasts. In 2004 the EU thought its population would decline by 16 million by 2050. Now it thinks it will increase by 10 million by 2060. Britain is expected to become the most populous EU country by 2060, with 77 million inhabitants. Right now it has 20 million fewer people than Germany. Italy's population was expected to fall precipitously; now it is predicted to stay flat.

Birth rates, of course, are very difficult to predict; immigrants may adapt to the fertility patterns of their new countries. So far the feared radicalisation of Europe’s Muslims has not occurred, but a British study found that second and third generations of Muslims are harder to integrate than their parents. The reactions of native Europeans might be more of a problem, as the resurgence of far-Right political parties in Europe suggests.

If Europeans want European culture, it looks as though they had better decide quickly what it is and invest in it by reproducing themselves.

Bookmark and Share
 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts
or get posts by email

 Recent Posts
Putting gendercide on the front page
11 Mar 2010
Female mortality matters
4 Mar 2010
Positive signs from the UN
23 Feb 2010
Vanishing Females in Vietnam
18 Jan 2010
China wakes up to consequences of one-child policy
15 Jan 2010

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge

 Archive
Mar 2010 | Feb 2010 | Jan 2010 | Dec 2009 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Is it a pig or a mouse pig?
19 Mar 2010
Does the public have the right to know about genetically modified meat?

Greeks resigned to tightening belts
19 Mar 2010
"Either we eradicate the debt, or the debt will eliminate the country," says the Prime Minister.

Some bright ideas just don’t work
19 Mar 2010
The contribution of atheism to the sum of the world’s happiness has been very meagre indeed.

The gathering storm
18 Mar 2010
The scandal of sexual abuse by priests in Europe is distracting us from an even bigger scandal in the future,…

Lessons from the twilight days of the liberal consensus
16 Mar 2010
An inspiring candidate has become a failing president. But a comparison with Lyndon B Johnson shows that the reasons for…


 Tags
fertitily, population, Korea, overpopulation, Russia, Bangladesh, European Union, ageing population, China, youth bulge, Denmark, military, gender imbalance, population decline, falling fertility, abortion, Middle East, Ethiopia, Latvia, Paul Ehrlich, poverty, one-child policy, Africa, climate change, population control, Copenhagen, United Kingdom, Nigeria, children, fertility, The Economist, USA, population bomb, democracy, family planning, Viagra, sex selection, immigration, Vietnam, Europe, austria, India, UN, South Korea, nursing homes, Uganda, bride shortage, religion, pro-natalism, sustainable development, Sweden, sex selective abortion, Brazil, Al Gore, life expectancy, population aging, history, investment, increasing birth rates, UNFPA, Jonathan Sacks, security, environment, Australia, morocco, gendercide, Optimum Population Trust, Muslim, low fertility trap, homosexuality, development, Britain, Muslim-Christian demography, Islam, over-population, unemployment, demographic dividend, aging, pensions, sex ratio, workforce shortage, shortages, Roger Short, demography, ageing, Japan, birth rate,