April
22nd
  2:52:48 AM

Peter Singer on feeding the world’s poor

Share   Facebook   Twitter
tags : over-population

I have been reading Peter Singer’s latest book, The life you can save: Acting now to end world poverty. Yes, that Peter Singer, the animal rights philosopher whose ethical system encompasses infanticide and euthanasia. While I have some grave reservations about his reasoning, his conclusions seem unobjectionable. His main point is that the wealthy West can end world poverty if it really wants to by giving effective aid to the developing world. To drive his point home, he describes a number of wonderful projects which cost little and change lives forever, like drilling wells for waterless villages in Ethiopia (cost US$10 per user) or curing the horror of obstetric fistulas in Africa (cost $450 per woman).

Ending poverty has become a crusade for Singer and this book could make him into a Mother Teresa figure in some circles. I’m not sure what the connection is with his radically utilitarian philosophy – perhaps he uses donations to Oxfam to offset his dark vision of human dignity. He has often lectured on the topic and is used to batting back hard balls from cynical listeners. Often, he says, people sneer, “Saving the lives of poor people now will only mean that more will die when the population eventually crashes because our planet has long passed its carrying capacity.”

Much to my surprise, Singer demolishes that objection.

But the problem is not that we are producing too little food; rather we’re not eating the food we grow. Nearly 100 million tonnes of grain per year is turning into biofuel that goes into American gas tanks... The world is not running out of food. The problem is that we – the relatively affluent – have found a way to consume four or five times as much food as would be possible if we were to eat the crops we grow directly. (pages 131, 132)

He winds up with the catchy slogan: “while [Malthus] envisaged the growth of populations leading to mass famines, so far the only looming danger is mass vegetarianism” (page 132). I am no fan of Professor Singer, but at least he has not been swept away by doomsday scenarios.



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Demography is Destiny
rss RSS feed of posts
or get posts by email

 Recent Posts
Germany’s demographic gloom
27 May 2010
Debts and deficits: Help for whom?
7 Apr 2010
Chinese workers getting scarce
30 Mar 2010
Bye-bye Baby Boomers
29 Mar 2010
Sterilisation-for-land deal not catching on in Colombia
26 Mar 2010

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
Family social policy: Family Edge
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2010 | Apr 2010 | Mar 2010 | Feb 2010 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Convicted felons are citizens too
30 Jul 2010
But 5.4 million Americans are currently barred from voting due to a felon conviction, with severe consequences for their rehabilitation…

Why the Dreyfus Affair Matters
30 Jul 2010
A century later we still have much to learn about the fragility of civilized behaviour.

Teach my child that, and you’ll be sorry
30 Jul 2010
It is not what you would want to read before breakfast, but it's the sex menu they are serving up…

Open monogamy
30 Jul 2010
What gays can teach straights about marriage, according to some people.

Reasoning about life
28 Jul 2010
Is it possible to reach agreement on disputed issues like abortion and euthanasia? Yes, but only if you are ready…


 Tags
Sweden, aging, fertitily, sex ratio, Ethiopia, climate change, demography, life expectancy, Viagra, Roger Short, Vietnam, population bomb, status of women, unemployment, Optimum Population Trust, Germany, overpopulation, debt, Japan, sex selective abortion, immigration, Denmark, baby boomers, Muslim-Christian demography, United Kingdom, abortion, over-population, austria, pro-natalism, Middle East, Muslim, Uganda, nursing homes, youth bulge, ageing, investment, homosexuality, Korea, security, birth rate, family planning, military, philanthropy, workforce shortage, religion, Bangladesh, Australia, demographic dividend, falling fertility, history, Al Gore, Copenhagen, low fertility trap, Britain, India, Brazil, fertility, Africa, ageing population, children, sustainable development, USA, increasing birth rates, Islam, gender imbalance, population, one-child policy, European Union, UNFPA, gendercide, population aging, pensions, shortages, Russia, morocco, poverty, sterilisation, Europe, bride shortage, Paul Ehrlich, South Korea, democracy, Colombia, environment, population decline, Latvia, UN, Nigeria, China, population control, The Economist, Jonathan Sacks, development, sex selection, labor shortages,