commentComment | emailEmail | printPrint | del.icio.usdel.icio.us | technoratiTechnorati | Share
Carolyn Moynihan | Wednesday, 19 November 2008

China forced abortion dropped after US pressure

Uyghur children: Flickr / centralasiatravellerForced abortions can still occur in China under the one-child policy, as a case that has been brought to international attention shows. An ethnic woman in the north-western Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region who is six months pregnant was forcibly taken by police to a hospital early this week to have the baby, her third child, aborted. However, pressure from the United States led to the abortion being abandoned. “I brought her home,” the local population control committee chief told Radio Free Asia. “She wasn’t in good enough health to have an abortion.”

The one-child policy applies mainly to majority Han Chinese and allows ethnic minorities, including Uyghurs, to have additional children, with peasants permitted to have three children and city-dwellers two. But while Tursun is a peasant, her husband is from the city, so their status is unclear. The government also uses financial incentives and disincentives to keep the birth-rate low. Couples can pay steep fines to have more children, although the fines are well beyond most people’s means.

The official website China Xinjiang Web reports that in three almost exclusively Uyghur areas, women over 49 with only one child are entitled to a one-time payment of 3,000 yuan (US$440), with the couple receiving 600 yuan ($88) yearly thereafter. The government plans to spend 25.6 million yuan ($3.7m) this year rewarding families who have followed the population policy, which it claims has prevented the births of some 3.7 million people in Xianjiang over the last 30 years.

The policy is enforced more strictly in cities, but penalties for exceeding the quota can be severe, including job losses, demotions, or expulsion from the Communist Party. Officials at all levels are subject to rewards or penalties based on whether they meet population targets set by their administrative region. ~ Radio Free Asia, Nov 18

 

commentComment | emailEmail | printPrint | del.icio.usdel.icio.us | technoratiTechnorati | Share

What do you think? Sound off! Our guidelines: be concise; stay on-topic; and don't lose your temper! Comments close after 2 weeks.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:
0/2000
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?
Type the characters you see in the image below:

freeupdates

Email

frontpage rss

Darwinism 2.0 has all the answers Euphoria is no excuse for sloppy thinking in the world's most influential news magazine, The EconomistMichael Cook | 10 Jan 2009

Battered by bleak midwinter blues? Try poetry The Victorian poet Francis Thompson, an Irish coffee and a good fire are the best way to beat Seasonal Affective Disorder.  Francis Phillips | 9 Jan 2009

Walking in a demographic winter wonderland Why are people averting their eyes from the coming collapse of population growth?
Jennifer Roback Morse | 8 Jan 2009

Seal pup silliness Regulations are piled upon regulations in Canada about killing seal pups, but there is no law about abortion.  Michelle Martin | 7 Jan 2009

Hamas and the Arab States The view of the Israeli invasion of Gaza from the Arab palace is quite different from the view on the Arab street. Kamran Bokhari and Reva Bhalla | 7 Jan 2009

Power play Reconnecting to the power grid is not child's play in Nigeria. Especially when you own the grid.
Nwachukwu Egbunike | 7 Jan 2009

A reform-minded education secretary? Barack Obama's choice for education secretary offers hope for a change in America's schools. Dan Lips | 6 Jan 2009

The educational reform we need most Smarter teachers? More parental involvement? More computers? Better assessment? Healthier lunches? Nope. Try harder-working kids.  Kevin Ryan | 5 Jan 2009

Gays angered by Pope’s stand on ecology If we don't trash the physical environment, do we have a right to trash the moral environment? Michael Cook | 2 Jan 2009

Liberty Forum better than U.N. Rights Council A former US diplomat argues that it is time for nations that truly respect human rights, to ditch the UNHRC for a body that promotes true rights. Kim Holmes | 2 Jan 2009

more...

rss del.icio.us technorati digg sitemap invite