eHarmony agrees to gay matchmaking

Do laws protecting homosexuality also threaten freedom of conscience? You bet they do. And, sadly, not everyone will be prepared to pay the price of defending their freedom. eHarmony, Inc, the company behind the internet matchmaking website founded by an Evangelical psychologist and initially targeted to the Christian community, has decided to launch a new matchmaking website for homosexual singles rather than fight a nearly four-year-old complaint in court.

The company, still popular among Christian singles, announced last month it had reached a settlement with the New Jersey attorney general, which began an investigation early in 2005 when a homosexual man filed a complaint with the state, alleging that the company’s policy of matchmaking only opposite-sex couples violated New Jersey’s anti-discrimination law, which covers “sexual orientation”.

According to the settlement, eHarmony will launch a new website aimed solely at homosexuals. As part of the settlement, eHarmony, Inc. will advertise the website in homosexual media outlets, will allow the first 10,000 users to register free and will pay $50,000 to the attorney general’s office and $5000 to the man who filed the initial complaint. It will also post a statement on the new website saying its matchmaking strategy is based on research involving heterosexual couples and not same-sex partners. (How long before they are obliged to do research on the latter? we wonder.)

eHarmony says it did not violate the law but felt the need to settle the case, which was already a “burden” for the company and which they might not win. However, the Boy Scouts successfully fought New Jersey’s anti-discrimination law in a case that went all the way to the US Supreme Court. Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, criticized eHarmony, saying that "the surest way to lose the culture war is refusing to fight." ~ Baptist Press, Nov 21

Comment (1) | Email | Print | del.icio.us | Technorati | Share

What do you think? Sound off! Our guidelines: be concise; stay on-topic; and don't lose your temper! Comments close after 2 weeks. So far there have been 1 comments

Name:

Email:

Location: (please select a country) none United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

URL:

0/2000

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Type the characters you see in the image below:

+ terms & conditions - terms & conditions

Comments on MercatorNet are moderated. They should be brief, preferably no more than 300 words. Messages that abuse others, have objectionable content, or contain commercial content or links will not be displayed. Comments which are thematically repetitive will not necessarily be displayed. Comments may be edited lightly for grammar, spelling and length.

---

Norman Jacka said...

Australia | Tue, 16 Dec 2008 at 2:25 pm

What rubbish, legal protections for gay people no more impinge on homophobe’s freedom of conscience than laws protecting people from racial discrimination and vilification impinge on racists’ freedom of conscience!

---

Page 1 of 1 :