June
05th
  2:50:13 PM

Little Masons and Isabellas multiply

stonemasonBaby names –and why people choose the ones they do—is always an interesting topic. Some stick to the Bible or peruse the sports page; others consult the tabloids or the most popular dramas on TV. Some parents prefer plain-Jane names; others like to be so original that they make up the name entirely. And the spelling.  And the pronunciation—and their children may or may not feel burdened by it for life.  

My given name is French; however I grew up in a predominantly German area where people could neither spell nor pronounce it. As a result, I actually disliked my name for many years—until I started meeting people of French extraction, to whom my name was neither a source of ridicule nor befuddlement. I was meant to be named for one of my grandmothers, but a raging sex scandal in Britain circumvented that. I told my mom she should have gone ahead anyway; no one remembers these things decades on, do they? But I do see her point: I don’t imagine too many American baby girls were named Monica in 1998.  

As the mother of seven girls, I did not end up utilizing any of my favourite boys’ names; by the fifth or sixth pregnancy, I had even given up thinking of them. Tending towards saints’ names (or their derivatives and diminutives) as well as Greek and Latin-derivations, my daughters’ names fall into the traditional category.  

It’s interesting to watch historical trends. This page lists the top five most popular names in America for the last 100 years.  As a student of history and literature, I also find it ironically amusing that many ‘occupation’ names that would have been anathema in the 19th century amongst the upper crust are now making the top tabloid stars’ lists: Mason, Draper, Cooper, Tanner, Hunter, Bailey, Carter, and Clark to list but a few. They used to signify jobs (of the menial blue collar variety)—now they are romantic leads on soap operas. Just think: maybe in another century or two, little boys will be named Janitor or Pizzadeliveryguy.

Picture: Bavarian stonemasons, c. 1505 (Wikimedia Commons)

 

 



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Parental consent: required for minors’ use of birth control?
19 Jun 2013
Baby name or status symbol?
17 Jun 2013
Still a Life Worth Living
14 Jun 2013
Aussie journalist: “I’m so sorry I didn’t kill you, mum”
12 Jun 2013
Detox your love life
10 Jun 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Jun 2013 | May 2013 | Apr 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

A mad way to die in Quebec
20 Jun 2013
The province is using extraordinary legal legerdemain to authorize euthanasia without violating the Canadian Criminal Code.

Recycling Mozart
19 Jun 2013
Music is transforming children's lives in an impoverished corner of Latin America.

Squatters on Europe’s Christian heritage
19 Jun 2013
Can human dignity find a firm foundation in secularism?

Networks of responsibility: the Philadelphia building collapse
18 Jun 2013
Who should ultimately take the blame in a tragedy of careless demolition which caused six deaths?

“Man of Steel”
18 Jun 2013
Finally we have an excellent adaptation of everyone's favourite comic book hero.


 Tags
fatherhood, media, family economics, parents, commitment, family policy, education of children, Africa, China, books, obesity, internet, teen pregnancy, large families, family, motherhood, pregnancy, Barack Obama, child wellbeing, sex education, names, children's health, prostitution, Hollywood, mothers, unemployment, same-sex marriage, child poverty, mental health, HomeMakers Project, adolescence, trafficking, one-child policy, emerging adults, fathers, youth, character education, European Union, employment, dating, France, language, poverty, sexual behaviour, homosexuality, abortion, video games, gender, family structure, celebrities, men, modesty, child abuse, birth control, HPV, family relationships, cohabitation, USA, Australia, research, family meals, family breakdown, family values, recession, polygamy, Canada, sexualisation of children, economics, work-life balance, young adult, divorce, fashion, parental consent, teenage pregnancy, media ethics, boys, United States, marriage, social networking, parenting, education, fertility, texting, daycare, child safety, women, adolescents, parenthood, National Marriage Project, happiness, gender equality, Facebook, New Zealand, child behaviour, friendship, teenagers, child development, Sweden, psychology, anger, adoption, United Nations, schools, ageing population, sleep, feminism, social media, single motherhood, health, pornography, child welfare, South Africa, same-sex parenting, HIVAIDS, television, children, girls, religion, brain, families, contraception, immigration, violence, morality, abstinence, smacking, UK, baby boomers, ageing, child obesity, childcare, technology, Spain, internet safety, working mothers, homeschooling, character, self-control, gendercide, AIDS, parental rights, work, demography, suicide,