November
05th
  6:49:32 AM

Conceived in rape: why Mourdock was right

The latest political kerfuffle over rape and abortion has largely been swept away by Hurricane Sandy, but the US Senate candidate Richard Mourdock deserves at least a defence of his views on the subject. Remember, in a media interview he was asked what he believed about a pregnancy following rape. He said:

I’ve struggled with it myself for a long time, but I came to realize that life is that gift from God. And even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.

Immediately a storm of vituperation broke over his head, but his view that a life begun -- not the rape -- is something God intends has been defended ably on Public Discourse by Christopher Tollefsen, and in the video below by women who were conceived in rape. 



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Humanity amongst the horror of Woolwich attack
25 May 2013
Housewife revival is not such a bad thing
23 May 2013
Declaration of 2013 World Congress of Families
21 May 2013
World Congress of Families 2013
19 May 2013
Rise of the stay-at-home dad
15 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

The Boy Scouts cave in
24 May 2013
Under enormous pressure, they have voted to welcome openly gay scouts. What message does the change in policy send young…

A boy’s life with unisex scouts
23 May 2013
The Boy Scouts of America will vote today on whether they will admit homosexual scouts. Will they become the Unisex…

Necessary excuses
23 May 2013
“Comfort women”, carpet bombing, atom bombs, lethal drones and genocide can all be justified by appeals to necessity.

Digital multitasking: scourge or blessing?
22 May 2013
How can we teach students to focus on what they ought to be doing?

Who or what is a “child”?
22 May 2013
Canada's Parliament lacks the courage to take a stand on defining when an unborn child will be protected by the…


 Tags
family breakdown, abortion, dating, adolescence, social networking, United States, poverty, fatherhood, violence, Spain, work, character, birth control, celebrities, family meals, recession, Canada, adolescents, adoption, self-control, education, media ethics, pregnancy, schools, sexualisation of children, religion, family values, texting, boys, children's health, character education, cohabitation, European Union, Barack Obama, obesity, child wellbeing, China, working mothers, ageing, research, unemployment, teenagers, anger, gender, Sweden, HIVAIDS, men, television, abstinence, mental health, ageing population, large families, child poverty, New Zealand, internet safety, parents, gendercide, United Nations, sex education, gender equality, Australia, fashion, media, sexual behaviour, friendship, parental rights, Africa, child safety, youth, technology, child development, smacking, homeschooling, Facebook, video games, family economics, childcare, HomeMakers Project, family relationships, France, child welfare, single motherhood, marriage, same-sex parenting, language, sleep, fathers, teenage pregnancy, names, young adult, Hollywood, divorce, same-sex marriage, family structure, parenting, National Marriage Project, modesty, contraception, mothers, morality, families, homosexuality, parenthood, brain, social media, UK, fertility, economics, commitment, trafficking, child abuse, pornography, motherhood, internet, one-child policy, child obesity, immigration, psychology, women, baby boomers, daycare, books, demography, family, teen pregnancy, USA, children, happiness, South Africa, health, AIDS, emerging adults, prostitution, education of children, family policy, girls, polygamy, suicide, work-life balance, child behaviour, feminism,