December
17th
  2:09:09 PM

An agenda for renewing marriage in America

family3

 

The National Marriage Project has released its 2012 report, calling for a national agenda to reverse the decline of marriage in Middle America:

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va., Dec. 16, 2012 — A team of family scholars today released “The President’s Marriage Agenda for the Forgotten Sixty Percent” to tackle the striking yet little-discussed decline in marriage among “Middle America” – the nearly 60 percent of Americans who have completed high school, but do not have a four-year college degree.

Among that group, 44 percent of children are now born outside of marriage, up sharply from 13 percent in the 1980s.

The agenda is the centerpiece of the latest “State of Our Unions” report, an annual, joint publication of the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia and the Institute for American Values in New York City.

According to numerous studies, children born or raised outside of marriage are more likely to suffer from a range of emotional and social problems – including drug use, depression, attempted suicide and dropping out of high school – compared to children in intact, married families, as summarized in past reports such as “Why Marriage Matters” from the same team.

While debates over same-sex marriage have filled the headlines, the rapid hollowing out of marriage in Middle America – more than half of births among women under 30 now occur outside of marriage – has received scant attention from national leaders, the report notes.

“Marriage in Middle America is at a tipping point, with unwed childbearing threatening to become a new norm,” said report co-author W. Bradford Wilcox, director of the National Marriage Project and a professor of sociology in U.Va.’s
College of Arts & Sciences.

“The children of Middle America, already vulnerable to economic challenges in their communities, are exposed to even greater risks when their parents are unable to form and sustain a healthy marriage,” said report lead author Elizabeth Marquardt, director of the Center for Marriage and Families at the Institute for American Values.

To reverse that prospect, the report’s recommendations include:
  • Eliminate marriage penalties and disincentives for the poor, for unwed mothers, and for older Americans, including lesser-known disincentives present in current Medicaid and Social Security policies.
  • Triple the child tax credit to shore up the economic foundations of family life in Middle America.
  • Help young men to become more marriageable and better husbands and fathers with job apprenticeship programs championed by report co-author Robert I. Lerman of the Urban Institute, military programs like the Strong Bonds Program, and prison programs like Within My Reach.
  • Enact the Second Chances Act, legislation to provide married couples who are thinking about divorce the time and educational resources necessary to make reconciliation a viable option.
  • Provide marriage education for newly forming stepfamilies.
  • Invest in and evaluate marriage and relationship education programs, especially those that target at-risk individuals and couples, such as Virginia’s Strengthening Families Initiative, the Family Expectations program in Oklahoma City, and First Things First in Chattanooga, Tenn. Fund such programs by devoting 1 percent to 2 percent of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families block grants.
  • Engage Hollywood, much as the anti-smoking movement did, to help shape positive American attitudes toward marriage and parenting.
  • Launch social media campaigns about the benefits of marriage, perhaps led by the U.S. Surgeon General.
  • Model how to talk about shared marriage values from a variety of perspectives.
“These recommendations would do a lot to signal that we value families,” said report co-author Linda Malone-Colon, founder of the National Center on African American Marriages and Parenting.

Even modest improvements in the health of marriage in America will reduce suffering and yield savings for taxpayers, the report argues. One study calculated that reducing family fragmentation by just 1 percent would save $1.1 billion annually as fewer children repeat grades, are suspended from school, require counseling or attempt suicide.

Noting that the disappearance of marriage in Middle America is tracking with the disappearance of the middle class in the same communities, the authors argue that strengthening marriage is a vital pathway to opening social opportunity and reducing inequality.

“The retreat from marriage is both a cause and a consequence of increasing inequality in America,” said report co-author David Blankenhorn, president of the Institute for American Values.

Marquardt said, “The president and all our nation’s leaders must confront the marriage challenge in Middle America with the urgency and compassion it deserves.”
Source: Press Release


 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Humanity amongst the horror of Woolwich attack
25 May 2013
Housewife revival is not such a bad thing
23 May 2013
Declaration of 2013 World Congress of Families
21 May 2013
World Congress of Families 2013
19 May 2013
Rise of the stay-at-home dad
15 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

The Boy Scouts cave in
24 May 2013
Under enormous pressure, they have voted to welcome openly gay scouts. What message does the change in policy send young…

A boy’s life with unisex scouts
23 May 2013
The Boy Scouts of America will vote today on whether they will admit homosexual scouts. Will they become the Unisex…

Necessary excuses
23 May 2013
“Comfort women”, carpet bombing, atom bombs, lethal drones and genocide can all be justified by appeals to necessity.

Digital multitasking: scourge or blessing?
22 May 2013
How can we teach students to focus on what they ought to be doing?

Who or what is a “child”?
22 May 2013
Canada's Parliament lacks the courage to take a stand on defining when an unborn child will be protected by the…


 Tags
work-life balance, demography, one-child policy, working mothers, internet safety, research, France, happiness, sex education, gender equality, European Union, pregnancy, trafficking, family, character education, young adult, teenagers, work, Spain, language, pornography, daycare, smacking, social networking, HIVAIDS, social media, UK, men, suicide, baby boomers, family economics, parents, Barack Obama, family meals, anger, United Nations, Australia, celebrities, HomeMakers Project, cohabitation, homeschooling, schools, sexual behaviour, Canada, parental rights, gender, motherhood, polygamy, texting, children, ageing, emerging adults, AIDS, gendercide, media, child development, fathers, education, feminism, character, fatherhood, New Zealand, mental health, boys, child behaviour, girls, teenage pregnancy, youth, teen pregnancy, brain, single motherhood, abortion, child wellbeing, self-control, friendship, mothers, Sweden, sexualisation of children, family relationships, child obesity, adolescents, violence, health, Hollywood, modesty, commitment, large families, names, books, ageing population, dating, USA, adolescence, South Africa, contraception, same-sex parenting, child poverty, homosexuality, National Marriage Project, Africa, family structure, Facebook, media ethics, prostitution, economics, families, women, child safety, technology, family values, childcare, unemployment, adoption, obesity, internet, same-sex marriage, family policy, parenthood, family breakdown, birth control, psychology, video games, abstinence, fertility, morality, immigration, child abuse, sleep, children's health, child welfare, United States, marriage, religion, divorce, television, education of children, China, poverty, recession, fashion, parenting,