January
05th
  9:45:43 PM

How children watch Sesame Street reveals intellectual skills

The way your children absorb information from the television program Sesame street could reveal how well developed they are intellectually, according to a novel new study.

The study, which used special equipment to examine children’s thought patterns while watching the program, has helped scientists to better understand children’s intellectual development.

 

Funded by the US National Institutes of Health and the James S. McDonnell Foundation, the study has been published in the January issue of the journal PLoS Biology.

It focussed on how individual children’s brains responded to the material in Sesame Street, showing that the brains of some children were able to respond more like the brains of adults. These children were subsequently shown to perform better on intellectual tests.

Lead author Jessica Cantlon, an assistant professor in the department of brain and cognitive sciences at the University of Rochester in New York, said: "It’s a step in the direction toward understanding what typical brain development looks like and predicting what might be going wrong."

She said the research made it possible to predict how well specific children will learn things such as maths and eventually to establish what is going wrong with children who are having trouble.

"It could be something wrong with their concept of numbers, or that there’s something more generally wrong – a kind of memory or attention impairment," she said. "You could use brain activity as another tool to see what’s going wrong."

An associate professor of psychology at the University of Western Ontario in Canada, neuroscientist Daniel Ansari, welcomed the research as a breakthrough.

"We can use this to understand how children approach these inputs, what kind of information they [pay attention] to," he said.

Developmental cognitive neuroscientist at the University of California, San Diego, Timothy Brown, said the findings don’t say anything specifically about "Sesame Street" but about how kids think. He said the study "suggests that the kids who did the best were able to focus the most, and are probably better at that in general".

He said that the study confirmed that children who are better at [focusing] in general are better at acquiring learned academic skills, because doing so requires attention, concentration and mental effort.

"However, the study is also novel in its use of more fluid, naturalistic, ‘real-world’ visual stimuli," he said, "which is innovative and important for advancing research on human brain development."

 



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Humanity amongst the horror of Woolwich attack
25 May 2013
Housewife revival is not such a bad thing
23 May 2013
Declaration of 2013 World Congress of Families
21 May 2013
World Congress of Families 2013
19 May 2013
Rise of the stay-at-home dad
15 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

The Boy Scouts cave in
24 May 2013
Under enormous pressure, they have voted to welcome openly gay scouts. What message does the change in policy send young…

A boy’s life with unisex scouts
23 May 2013
The Boy Scouts of America will vote today on whether they will admit homosexual scouts. Will they become the Unisex…

Necessary excuses
23 May 2013
“Comfort women”, carpet bombing, atom bombs, lethal drones and genocide can all be justified by appeals to necessity.

Digital multitasking: scourge or blessing?
22 May 2013
How can we teach students to focus on what they ought to be doing?

Who or what is a “child”?
22 May 2013
Canada's Parliament lacks the courage to take a stand on defining when an unborn child will be protected by the…


 Tags
contraception, Canada, child development, morality, motherhood, commitment, character education, Spain, same-sex parenting, demography, child obesity, mothers, UK, friendship, parents, families, prostitution, family economics, ageing, Sweden, teen pregnancy, celebrities, abstinence, childcare, family breakdown, family policy, parenting, China, cohabitation, adolescents, self-control, marriage, baby boomers, books, sexualisation of children, fertility, child behaviour, boys, texting, dating, smacking, AIDS, work, Facebook, psychology, happiness, names, working mothers, homeschooling, social networking, parental rights, trafficking, media, internet, girls, gendercide, child abuse, same-sex marriage, poverty, New Zealand, economics, child poverty, HIVAIDS, family values, one-child policy, divorce, Barack Obama, suicide, Australia, European Union, gender equality, large families, ageing population, gender, family meals, video games, technology, pornography, National Marriage Project, United Nations, character, pregnancy, recession, modesty, internet safety, research, homosexuality, violence, obesity, sleep, USA, young adult, children's health, child wellbeing, fathers, education of children, teenagers, South Africa, mental health, United States, parenthood, religion, health, language, fashion, family relationships, emerging adults, family structure, immigration, polygamy, education, Hollywood, work-life balance, television, child safety, teenage pregnancy, men, schools, adoption, HomeMakers Project, women, media ethics, unemployment, feminism, France, sex education, family, youth, sexual behaviour, fatherhood, children, brain, child welfare, social media, daycare, anger, abortion, Africa, adolescence, birth control, single motherhood,