January
25th
  3:43:18 PM

How low can they go?

Carolyn Moynihan | 25 Jan 2013 | comment


tags : culture of death, Roe v. Wade,

This NOT NICE. It is creepy. And patronising. And sexist. And elitist. And advocating substance abuse. But, as a "celebration" of Roe v. Wade it is instructive regarding the moral decadence attendant on, and driving, the culture of death.



  
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Declaration of 2013 World Congress of Families
21 May 2013
World Congress of Families 2013
19 May 2013
Rise of the stay-at-home dad
15 May 2013
Record proportion of new mothers are college educated
13 May 2013
Brenda Heist case reveals increase in mothers who leave their children
11 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Digital multitasking: scourge or blessing?
22 May 2013
How can we teach students to focus on what they ought to be doing?

Who or what is a “child”?
22 May 2013
Canada's Parliament lacks the courage to take a stand on defining when an unborn child will be protected by the…

We’re all mad here
21 May 2013
That's the message of the new edition of the bible for American psychiatrists, DSM-5. Diagnostic inflation is about to become…

Jolie’s Choice
20 May 2013
Angelina Jolie's decision to have a double mastectomy made headlines around the world. But is she sending women the right…

A fight for equality or a war on difference?
20 May 2013
To invite the government to give us phony equalities by recognising gay marriage is to invite greater state intervention into…


 Tags
children, single motherhood, work, family values, work-life balance, young adult, economics, childcare, obesity, marriage, ageing population, daycare, sleep, technology, abortion, family economics, suicide, New Zealand, mental health, United States, family breakdown, adoption, child safety, families, gender, National Marriage Project, education, fashion, names, character education, adolescence, parental rights, Spain, internet safety, religion, cohabitation, immigration, Hollywood, violence, parents, family relationships, celebrities, television, girls, commitment, family structure, UK, prostitution, child behaviour, parenting, gendercide, one-child policy, books, teenage pregnancy, gender equality, child wellbeing, youth, child abuse, texting, women, child poverty, AIDS, feminism, Sweden, contraception, Australia, HomeMakers Project, homeschooling, polygamy, same-sex parenting, psychology, social media, character, fathers, research, European Union, morality, health, internet, media, teen pregnancy, same-sex marriage, education of children, fertility, child obesity, pornography, pregnancy, dating, Canada, family meals, adolescents, self-control, media ethics, schools, anger, boys, poverty, China, sex education, USA, ageing, child development, sexualisation of children, friendship, sexual behaviour, smacking, children's health, unemployment, Facebook, family, motherhood, modesty, brain, large families, fatherhood, homosexuality, France, demography, divorce, teenagers, Barack Obama, men, Africa, family policy, abstinence, working mothers, trafficking, language, child welfare, emerging adults, South Africa, happiness, video games, social networking, mothers, baby boomers, United Nations, birth control, HIVAIDS, parenthood, recession,